Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Cep telefonundan yayılan elektromanyetik dalganın erişkin erkek kobaylarda bazı üreme parametreleri üzerine etkisi

Effect of electromagnetic wave emitted from mobile phone on some reproductive parameters in adult male guinea pigs

Pages
77–84
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there was a significantly (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects electromagnetic wave (EMW) (900 MHz) emitted by mobile phones, for 60 days, upon the testis weight and epididymal sperm quality in male guinea pigs were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twelve healthy male guinea pigs were assigned randomly as the treatment (n=6) and control (n=6) groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there was a significantly (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The effects electromagnetic wave (EMW) (900 MHz) emitted by mobile phones, for 60 days, upon the testis weight and epididymal sperm quality in male guinea pigs were investigated. Twelve healthy male guinea pigs were assigned randomly as the treatment (n=6) and control (n=6) groups. Treatment group (group EMW) was exposed to electromagnetic field of 900 MHz (217 Hz pulse rate, 2 W maximum peak power, SAR 0.95 w/kg) emitted by a mobile phone (used daily as; 20 min calling, then kept in ‘standby’ position for 23 h 40 min/day) for 20 min per day for 60 days. Control group (Group C) was maintained under similar conditions, with no radiation. Unlike the males in Group C kept in a separate room, those in exposed-group were subjected to electromagnetic radiation being operated at 900 MHz EMW field. There were not significant (P>0.05) differences between the groups based on the testicle weight (3.6 g vs. 4.4 g), sperm motility (61.7% vs. 70.0%), and abnormal sperm rate (5.8% vs. 3.7%) in treated and control males, respectively. However, there was a significantly (P

Özet

Bu çalışmada, rutin kullanımdaki mobil telefondan yayılan 900 MHz’lik elektromanyetik alana (EMA) 60 gün süreyle maruz kalan erkek Gine domuzlarında testis ağırlığı ve epididimal sperm kalitesi araştırıldı. Oniki adet sağlıklı erkek kobay rastgele uygulama, EMA (n=6) ve kontrol, K (n=6) grubu olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Uygulama grubu (Grup EMA), 60 gün süre ile her gün mobil bir telefonla yayılan (telefonu 20 dk çaldırma/konuşma modu, 23 saat 40 dk uyku/standby modu) 900 MHz’lik EMA’a (217 Hz pulse rate, 2 W maximum peak power, SAR 0.95 w/kg) maruz bırakıldı. Kontrol grubu (Grup K) benzer şartlar altında tutuldu, ancak radyasyona maruz bırakılmadı. Grup EMA ve K arasında, sırasıyla, testis ağırlığı (3.6 g ve 4.4 g), epididimal sperm motilitesi (%61.7 ve %70.0) ve anormal sperm oranı (%5.8 ve %3.7) bakımından anlamlı farklılıklar gözlenmedi (P>0.05). Bununla birlikte, Grup EMA’deki sperm sayısı (549.6 x 106 sperm/ml) Grup K’dekilerden (799.17 x 106 sperm/ml) önemli düzeyde (P

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAR, Ö., USLU, B. A., DEĞER, Y., KILIÇALP, D. K., GÜLYÜZ, F. (2022). Cep telefonundan yayılan elektromanyetik dalganın erişkin erkek kobaylarda bazı üreme parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 77–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/456021

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agarwal A., 2007. Cell phones and male infertility: dissecting the relationship. Reprod. Biomed., 15, 266-270.
  2. Agarwal A., Deepinder F., Sharma RK., Ranga G., Li J., 2008. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil. Steril., 89, 124-128.
  3. Aitken R., Bennetts L., Sawyer D., Wiklendt A., King B., 2005. Impact of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int. J. Androl., 28, 171-179.
  4. Atessahin A., Karahan I., Turk G., Gur S., Yilmaz S., Ceribasi AO., 2006. Protective role of lycopene on cisplatininduced changes in sperm characteristics, testicular damage and lipid peroxidation in rats. Reprod. Toxicol.,21, 42-47.
  5. Dasdag S., Ketani MA., Akdag Z., Ersay AR., Sari I., Demirtas OC., Celik MS., 1999. Whole body microwave exposure emitted by cellular phones and testicular function of rats. Urol. Res., 27, 219-223.
  6. Dasdag S., Akdag MZ., Aksen F., Yilmaz F., Bashan M., Dasdag M., Celik MS., 2003a. Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics, 24,182-188.
  7. Dasdag S., Akdag MZ., Ulukaya E., Uzunlar AK., Yegin D., 2003b. Mobile phone exposure does not induce apoptosis on spermatogenesis in rats. Arch. Med.Res., 39, 40-44.
  8. Davoudi M., Brossner C., Kuber W., 2002. The influence of electromagnetic waves on sperm motility. J. Urol., 19, 18-22.
  9. Ergün G., Aktaş S., 2009. ANOVA modellerinde kareler toplamı yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 15, 481-484.
  10. Erogul O., Oztas E., Yildirim I., Kir T., Aydur E., Komesli G., Irkilata HC., Irmak MK., Peker AF., 2006. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: An in vitro study. Arch. Med. Res., 37, 840-843.
  11. Fejes I., Zaivaczki Z., Szallosi J., Koloszair S., Daru J., Kovaics L., Pail A., 2005. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch. Androl.,51, 385-393.
  12. Fitzsimmons RJ., Strong DD., Mohan S., Baylink DJ., 1992. Low-amplitude, low-frequency electricity fieldstimulated bone cell proliferation may in part be mediated by increased IGF-II release. J. Cell. Physiol.,150, 84-89.
  13. Goodman R., Henderson AS., 1988. Exposure of salivary gland cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields alters polypeptide synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA., 85, 3928-3932.
  14. Jones R., Mann T., Sherins R., 1979. Peroxidative breakdown of phospholipids in human spermatozoa:spermicidal effects of