Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

The effect of foreign trade and customs union between Turkey-Eu (15 Countries) into marginal intra-industry trade and its comparison with intra-industry trade

Türkiye-Ab (15 Ülke) arasındaki dış ticaret ve gümrük birliği'nin marjinal endüstri-içi ticarete etkisi ve endüstri-içi ticaretle karşılaştırılması

Pages
367–382
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In contrast, despite an increase in foriegn trade volume in 5-8 industrial goods, a change in MIIT rates was found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increase in Intra-Industry Trade (IIT) co-efficient calculated according to Grubel-Lloyd model does not always indicate IIT increase in that sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Increase in interindustry trade in the related sector may cause an increase in intra-industry trade co-efficient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In contrast, despite an increase in foriegn trade volume in 5-8 industrial goods, a change in MIIT rates was found.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Increase in Intra-Industry Trade (IIT) co-efficient calculated according to Grubel-Lloyd model does not always indicate IIT increase in that sector. Increase in interindustry trade in the related sector may cause an increase in intra-industry trade co-efficient. Therefore, in order to define the real effect of intra-industry trade in the related sector,Marginal Intra-Industry Co-Efficient Index was developed. In the study, foreign trade and Marginal Intra-Industry Trade (MIIT) of the 1990-2008 period between EU (15 countries) and Turkey were examined, and effects of Customs Union were searched. In the MEIT analysis between Turkey-EU (15 countries), in the primary goods belonging to 0-4 group, an important stable change was not found on MIIT rates, but an increase in foreign trade volume was noted. In contrast, despite an increase in foriegn trade volume in 5-8 industrial goods, a change in MIIT rates was found.

Özet

Grubel-Lloyd yöntemine göre hesaplanan endüstri içi ticaret katsayısının (EİT) yükselmesi her zaman o sektörde EİTin artmasına işaret etmemektedir. İlgili sektörde endüstriler arası ticaretin artması da endüstri-içi ticaret katsayısının yükselmesine neden olabilmektedir. Bu nedenle, ilgili sektörde endüstri-içi ticaretin gerçek etkisini belirleyebilmek için Marjinal Endüstri İçi Ticaret Katsayısı Endeksi geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, AB (15 Ülke) ve Türkiye arasında 1990 -2008 dönemine ait dış ticaret ve Marjinal Endüstri-İçi Ticaret(MEİT) incelenmiş ve Gümrük Birliğinin etkileri araştırılmıştır. Türkiye AB 15 ülke arasındaki MEİT incelendiğinde 0-4 gruba ait birincil mallarda, MEİT oranlarında önemli istikrarlı değişim görülmemiş fakat dış ticaret hacminde artış kaydedilmiştir. Buna karşın 5-8 sanayi mallarında ise dış ticaret hacminde artış olmakla beraber, MEİT oranlarında değişim görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Ö., YERGİN, H., MERCAN, M. (2022). The effect of foreign trade and customs union between Turkey-Eu (15 Countries) into marginal intra-industry trade and its comparison with intra-industry trade. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 367–382. https://ajindex.com/articles/454490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abd el-Rahman, K. (1991). “Firm’s Competitive and National Comparative Advantage as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(1), 83-97.
  2. Aquino, A. (1978). “Intra Industry Trade Inter- Industry Trade Specialization as Concurrent Sources of İnternational Trade in Manufactures”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 114(1) 275-296
  3. Balassa B. (1966). “Tariff Reduction and Trade in Manufacturers among The Industrial Countries”. The American Economic Review, 56 (3), 466-473.
  4. Balassa B. (1986). “Intra-Industry Specialization: A Cross-Counry Analysis European”. Economic Review, 21 (42), 27-42.
  5. Balassa B. (1988) “Bauwens Luc, Inter-Industry and Intra-Industry Specialization in Manufactured Goods”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 124, 1-12
  6. Başkol, M. O. (2005). “Endüstri İçi Ticaret Teorisi Açısından Dış Ticaret Yapımızın Değerlemesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat Anabilim Dalı. Bernhofen, M. D. (1997). “Intra Industry Trade and Strategic Interaction: Theory and Evidence”. Journal of İnternational Economics, 45, 77-96.
  7. Brulhart, M. (1995). “Industrial Specialisation, in The European Union: A Test of The New Trade Theory”. Trinity Economic Papers Series, Technical Paper, 95/5, 4-29.
  8. Brulhart, M. (2002). “Intra- Industry Trade: Towards Measure of Non-Disruptive Trade Expansion, Published in “Frontiers of Research on Intra-Industry Trade”. Palgrave- Macmillan, Edited by P.J. Lloyd and Hyun Lee, 1-26
  9. Brulhart, M. (2008). “An Account of Global Intra-Industry Trade 1962-2006.
  10. University of Lausenne, School of Economic and Business Administration (FEC- Lausenne), Research Paper Series, 401-459.
  11. Czarny, E. (2003). “Intra-Industry Trade Do We Really Know What Is?”. Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. www.Etsg.org/ETSG 2003/Papers/Czarny Çakmak, Ö. A. (2006). “Türkiye ile Almanya, İtalya, Fransa ve İngiltere Arasında İmalat Endüstrisinde Endüstri-İçi Ticaretin Yapısı: 1991-2004”. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt:3, Yıl:2 Sayı:1,3, ss.33-47. Drèze, J. (1961). “Les exportations intra-C.E.E. en 1958 et la position Belge”, Recherches Économiques de Louvain, 27, 717-738.
  12. Emirhan, P. N. (2002). “Intra-Industry Trade Dynamıcs of Turkey”, Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2002/Papers/Emirhan.pdf
  13. Finger, J. M. (1975). “Trade Overlap And Intra-Industry Trade”. Economic Inquiry, 13(4), 581-589.
  14. Gray, H. P. (1980). “Intra Industry Trade: An “Untidy” Phenomenon”. Review of World E