SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

PRESERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON USABILITY OF ANALOGIES IN SCIENCE COURSES AND THEIR EXAMPLES

FEN BİLGİSİ DERSLERİNDE BENZEŞİMLERİN ANALOJİ KULLANILABİLİRLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ GÖRÜŞLERİ VE ÖRNEKLERİ

Erhan EKİCİ
Fatma EKİCİ
Fatih AYDIN
Pages
95–113
Publication Date
2007-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, includes pre-service science teachers’ views on usability of analogies in science courses and preparation analogy based syllabus in pre-study and post-study and the investigation of analogy examples which is exactly generated by themselves on the based of context and characteristic and category during the 8 weeks period

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of analogy in learning has been extensively investigated in science education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In these researches, using of the strategy in the several approaches has been emphasized with advantages and disadvantages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, includes pre-service science teachers’ views on usability of analogies in science courses and preparation analogy based syllabus in pre-study and post-study and the investigation of analogy examples which is exactly generated by themselves on the based of context and characteristic and category during the 8 weeks period
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analoji · Fen Eğitimi · Öğretmen Adayı

Abstract

The role of analogy in learning has been extensively investigated in science education. In these researches, using of the strategy in the several approaches has been emphasized with advantages and disadvantages. The analogies that to be an important learning and teaching tool, play important role on learning and developing of scientific ideas and concepts. The most important purpose of the using analogy is to be developed the understanding of abstract cases phenomenon by utilizing from concrete examples. This study, includes pre-service science teachers’ views on usability of analogies in science courses and preparation analogy based syllabus in pre-study and post-study and the investigation of analogy examples which is exactly generated by themselves on the based of context and characteristic and category during the 8 weeks period

Özet

Fen eğitiminde analojinin öğrenmedeki rolü geniş ve yaygın bir şekilde araştırılmıştır. Bu araştırmalarda fen eğitiminde analoji yöntemini çeşitli yaklaşımlarla kullanmanın avantajları ve dezavantajları vurgulanmıştır. Önemli bir öğrenme ve öğretme aracı da olan analojiler, bilimsel fikir ve kavramların öğrenilmesi ve geliştirilmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadırlar. Analoji kullanımının en önemli amacı somut örneklerden yararlanarak soyut olayları olguları anlamayı geliştirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİCİ, E., EKİCİ, F., AYDIN, F. (2007). PRESERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON USABILITY OF ANALOGIES IN SCIENCE COURSES AND THEIR EXAMPLES. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 95–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/453848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bilalo lu, R. G. (2006). Altı Ya Çocuklarına Ba ı ıklık Sisteminin Analoji le Ö retiminin Ba arı ve Kalıcılı a Etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Yayımlanmamı Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Adana Brown, D. E. & Clement, J. (1987). Overcoming Misconceptions in Mechanics: A Comparison of Two Example-Based Teaching Strategies. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Assocation, Washington, DC. Brown, D. E. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming Misconceptions via Analogical Reasoning: Abstract Transfer Versus Explanatory Model Construction. Instructional Science. 18, 237–261
  2. Clement, J. (1987). Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Physics: The Role of Anchoring Intuitions and Analogical Validity. In J. Novak (Ed.) Proceedings of The 2nd International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, v.3, 84-97
  3. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students preconceptions in physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30 (10), 1241–1257.
  4. Çimen, S. (1999). Okulöncesi E itimde Analoji. Yayımlanmamı Seminer Raporu, A. Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. Science Education, 79, 295–312.
  5. Dagher, Z. R. (1998). The Case for Analogies in Teaching Science for Understanding, in Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H, Novak J. D., (Eds.) Teaching Science for Understanding; A Constructivist View, Academic Pres. Driver, R. and Bell, B. (1986). Students’ Thinking and the Learning of Science: A Constructivist View. School Science Review, 67, 443 – 456. Duit, R. (1991). On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science. Science Education. 75 (6), 649– 672. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-Mappind: A Theoretical Analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, for 155–170.
  6. Gentner, D. & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and Learning by Analogy. American Psychologist. 52 (1), 32–34.
  7. Glynn, S. M. (1989). The Teaching with Analogies Concepts in Expository Texts. In K. Explaining D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Text: Research into Practice. Neward, DE: International Reading Association, 185–204.
  8. Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining Science Concepts: A Teaching-With- Analogies-Model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, & B. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 219–240.
  9. Glynn, S. M.,