SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

ODONTOGENIC CYST: CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF ODONTOGENIC CYSTS OF 100 PATIENTS WHO REFERRED TO THE ATATURK UNIVERSITY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT

ODONTOJENİK KİST: ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ AĞIZ, DİŞ VE ÇENE CERRAHİSİ ANABİLİM DALI’NA ODONTOJENİK KİST NEDENİYLE BAŞVURAN 100 OLGUNUN KLİNİK VE RADYOLOJİK OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Gelengül URVASIZOĞLU
Berkay AŞKIN
Pages
313–319
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The importance of routine follow-up examinations and histopathological finding are reported for final diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the demographic information and lesion localization of patients with odontogenic cysts in our region and to compare these data with the rest of the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out by collecting 100 patients with a diagnosis of odontogenic cyst from patients admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University between 2017-2018 and these were histopathologically re-evaluated to confirm the diagnosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The importance of routine follow-up examinations and histopathological finding are reported for final diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the demographic information and lesion localization of patients with odontogenic cysts in our region and to compare these data with the rest of the world. Although the odontogenic cysts constitute a major part of oral pathological lesions, information about their distribution patterns in different populations has been unclear. This study was carried out by collecting 100 patients with a diagnosis of odontogenic cyst from patients admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University between 2017-2018 and these were histopathologically re-evaluated to confirm the diagnosis. Demographic information of patients (age and sex) and location of the lesion were recorded and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The male to female ratio was 1.66:1 in study population. The mean age of the patients was 31.2 years (range 3-75 years). 48% of cysts were found in maxilla and 52% in mandible. Radicular cyst(%56) was the most common type, followed by dentigerous cyst(%16), residual cyst(%15), paradental cyst(%5), and odontogenic keratocyst(%5). Lateral periodontal cyst(%1) and eruption cyst (%2) were also observed in limited number of cases. The distribution pattern of odontogenic cysts in Erzurum is relatively similar to that in other parts of the world. The importance of routine follow-up examinations and histopathological finding are reported for final diagnosis.

Özet

Bu çalıĢmanın amacı, bölgemizde odontojenik kistgörülen hastaların demografik bilgilerini ve lezyonlokalizasyonlarını tespit etmek ve bu verileri dünyageneli ile karĢılaĢtırmaktır. Odontojenik kistler oralpatolojik lezyonların önemli bir bölümünüoluĢturmasına rağmen, çeĢitli popülasyonlardakidağılım modelleri henüz açıklığa kavuĢturulamamıĢtır.Bu çalıĢma, Atatürk Üniversitesi DiĢ Hekimliği FakültesiAğız, DiĢ ve Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı‟na 2017-2018yılları arasında baĢvuran hastalardan odontojenik kisttanısı alan 100 olgu seçilerek gerçekleĢtirildi ve tanıyıdoğrulamak için histopatolojik inceleme yapıldı.Hastaların demografik bilgileri (yaĢ ve cinsiyet) velezyonun yeri tanımlayıcı istatistikler kullanılarakkaydedildi ve analiz edildi.ÇalıĢma popülasyonunda erkek-kadın oranı 1.66: 1olarak bulundu. Hastaların ortalama yaĢının 31,2 yıl(yaĢ aralığı 3-75) olduğu görüldü. Kistlerin % 48'imaksillada, % 52'si ise mandibulada bulundu.Radiküler kist(%56) en sık görülen tipti ve bunutakiben dentigeröz kist(%16), rezidüel kist(%15),paradental kist(%5), odontojenik keratokist(%5) diğersık görülen kistler arasındaydı. Ayrıca lateralperiodontal kist(%1) ve erüpsiyon kisti(%2) de azsayıda vakada gözlendi. Erzurum‟daki odontojenikkistlerin dağılım modeli, dünyanın diğer bölgeleriylebenzerdir. Lezyonların kesin tanısı için rutin takibin vehistopatolojik bulguların önemi vurgulandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

URVASIZOĞLU, G., AŞKIN, B. (2022). ODONTOGENIC CYST: CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF ODONTOGENIC CYSTS OF 100 PATIENTS WHO REFERRED TO THE ATATURK UNIVERSITY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 313–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/451836

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Soluk-Tekkeşin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization Classification of Odontogenic Lesions: A Summary of the Changes of the 2017 (4th) Edition. Turkish J Pathol, 2018; 34. Varinauskas V, Gervickas A, Rožnova O. Analysis of odontogenic cysts of the jaws. Medicina 2006; 42: 201-7. Robinson RA. Diagnosing the most common odontogenic cystic and osseous lesions of the jaws for the practicing pathologist. Modern Pathol 2017; 30: S96. Sharifian MJ, Khalili M. Odontogenic cysts: a retrospective study of 1227 cases in an Iranian population from 1987 to 2007. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 361-7.
  2. Zhao Y-F, Wei J-X, Wang S-P. Treatment of odontogenic keratocysts: a follow-up of 255 Chinese patients. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, and Endod, 2002; 94: 151-6.
  3. Zecha JA, Mendes RA, Lindeboom VB, van der Waal I. Recurrence rate of keratocystic odontogenic tumor after conservative surgical treatment without adjunctive therapies–A 35-year single institution experience. Oral Oncol 2010; 46: 740-2.
  4. Boffano P, Ruga E, Gallesio C. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (odontogenic keratocyst): preliminary retrospective review of epidemiologic, clinical, and radiologic features of 261 lesions from University of Turin. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2994-9.
  5. Blanas N, Freund B, Schwartz M, Furst IM. Systematic review of the treatment and prognosis of the odontogenic keratocyst. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, and Endod 2000; 90: 553-58. Shear M. The aggressive nature of the odontogenic keratocyst: is it a benign cystic neoplasm? Part 1. Clinical and early experimental evidence of aggressive behaviour. Oral Oncol 2002; 38: 219- 26. Jones A, Craig G, Franklin C. Range and demographics of odontogenic cysts diagnosed in a UK population over a 30‐year period. J Oral Pathol & Med 2006; 35: 500-7.
  6. Mosqueda-Taylor A, Irigoyen-Camacho M, DiazFranco M, Torres-Tejero M. Odontogenic cysts. Analysis of 856 cases. Medicina Oral: Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Med Oral y de la Academia Iberoamericana de Pathol y Med Bucal 2002; 7: 89-96.
  7. Ochsenius G, Escobar E, Godoy L, Peñafiel C. Odontogenic cysts: analysis of 2.944 cases in Chile. Med Oral, Oral Pathol y Cirugía Bucal (Internet) 2007; 12: 85-91. Ertem SY. 38 Vakalık Seride Çenelerdeki Kistlerin Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012; 22: 139-43.
  8. Silvestre A, Soulie D, Rizzoli P, Helie O, Le GF, Cordoliani Y. Dental-radicular cysts invading the maxillary sinus. J Radiol 199