Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Consumers Regarding Meat Consumption at Home

Tüketicilerin Ev Ortamında Et Tüketimi Konusundaki Gıda Güvenliği Bilgi, Tutum ve Uygulamaları

Pages
381–392
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By considering these results, it is recommended to prepare questionnaires and interviews to reveal the status of applications for measuring food safety information of consumers in other regions of Turkey, and planning preventive measures to eliminate risks in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is conducted to determine the meat purchase, storage, handling or preparation, and personal hygiene practices of consumers living in Istanbul and their level of knowledge on food safety practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A questionnaire was sent to 830 consumers, who were responsible for primary shopping and cooking in their households.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By considering these results, it is recommended to prepare questionnaires and interviews to reveal the status of applications for measuring food safety information of consumers in other regions of Turkey, and planning preventive measures to eliminate risks in future studies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gıda güvenliği · Kırmızı et · Kanatlı eti

Abstract

This study is conducted to determine the meat purchase, storage, handling or preparation, and personal hygiene practices of consumers living in Istanbul and their level of knowledge on food safety practices. A questionnaire was sent to 830 consumers, who were responsible for primary shopping and cooking in their households. Participants achieved a certain score with their responses to the statements in the questionnaire. The difference between the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants and their scores was determined by independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA. A significant difference was observed in participants' knowledge scores about meat purchasing and carrying, storage and preparation practices and gender (p0.05). By considering these results, it is recommended to prepare questionnaires and interviews to reveal the status of applications for measuring food safety information of consumers in other regions of Turkey, and planning preventive measures to eliminate risks in future studies.

Özet

Bu çalışma, İstanbul’daki tüketicilerin et satın alma ve taşıma, depolama, hazırlama ve kişisel hijyen uygulamaları ile gıda güvenliği bilgi düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Anket, hanelerde birincil alışveriş ve yemek yapma sorumluluğunu üstlenen 830 tüketiciye gönderilmiştir. Katılımcılar ankette yer alan ifadelere verdikleri yanıtlarla belirli bir puan almıştır. Katılımcıların gıda güvenliği bilgisindeki puan farklılıklarının sosyo-demografik parametrelerden etkilenip etkilenmediğini araştırmak için ANOVA ve t testleri kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların et satın alma ve taşıma, depolama, hazırlama ve kişisel hijyen uygulamaları hakkındaki bilgi puanları ile cinsiyet arasında anlamlı bir fark gözlemlenmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MUŞTU, Ç., CEYLAN, V., SARIIŞIK, M. (2021). Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Consumers Regarding Meat Consumption at Home. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 381–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/450844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bolek, S. (2020). Consumer knowledge, attitudes, and judgments about food safety: A consumer analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 102, 242-248
  2. Mol, S., Akay, K.U., Guney, G.Ç. (2018). Seafood safety at home: Knowledge and practices. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 13, 95-100
  3. Clayton, D.A., Griffith, C.J., Price, P. (2003). An investigation of the factors underlying consumers’ implementation of specific food safety practices. British Food Journal, 105(7), 434-453
  4. Jevšnik, M., Hlebec, V., Raspor, P. (2008). Consumers’ awareness of food safety from shopping to eating. Food Control, 19(8), 737-745
  5. Badrie, N., Gobin, A., Dookeran, S., Duncan, R. (2006). Consumer awareness and perception to food safety hazards in Trinidad, West Indies. Food Control, 17(5), 370-377
  6. Bryan, F.L. (1988). Risks of practices, procedures and processes that lead to outbreaks of foodborne diseases, Journal of food protection, 51(8), 663-673
  7. Lange, M., Göranzon, H., Marklinder, I. (2014). Teaching young consumers’–food safety in home and consumer studies from a teacher's perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(4), 357-366
  8. Redmond, E., Griffith, C., Redmond, E.C. Griffith, C.J. (2006). Assessment of consumer food safety education provided by local authorities in the UK. British Food Journal, 108(9), 732-752
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). (2015), Food Safety: What you should know? available at: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/world_health_day/2015/whd-what-you-should-know/en/#targetText=Food%20safety%20is%20about%20producing,organic%20or%20locally%20produced%20food%3F (accessed 20 May 2020
  10. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA and ECDC). (2018). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2017. The EFSA Journal (European food Safety Authority), 16(12), 262
  11. Meredith, L., Lewis, R., Haslum, M. (2001). Contributory factors to the spread of contamination in a model kitchen, British Food Journal, 103(1), 23-36
  12. York, V.K., Brannon, L.A., Shanklin, C.W., Roberts, K.R., Barrett, B.B., Howells, A.D. (2009). Intervention improves restaurant employees' food safety compliance rates. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(4), 459-478
  13. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA and ECDC). (20