Journals / Art-Sanat Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

SHOES AS A LIFE PROBLEM

BİR YAŞAM SORUNSALI OLARAK AYAKKABILAR

Pages
177–192
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this very reason, this paper aims to bring about a new interpretation – through Bataille- of shoes in Van Gogh’s works together with an investigation into his style in other works.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Art displays life explicitly while blessing it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to evaluate the interpretations of Meyer Schapiro and Heidegger through Van Gogh’s drawing of shoes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this very reason, this paper aims to bring about a new interpretation – through Bataille- of shoes in Van Gogh’s works together with an investigation into his style in other works.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Art displays life explicitly while blessing it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interpretations of Meyer Schapiro and Heidegger through Van Gogh’s drawing of shoes. Just like the two philosophers put it, the main question here is about who wears these shoes, a peasant or a townsman? In this context, one could get the impression that works represent daily life but the background about the life they depict gives them another quality. For this very reason, this paper aims to bring about a new interpretation – through Bataille- of shoes in Van Gogh’s works together with an investigation into his style in other works.

Özet

Sanat yaşamı bir yandan kutsarken bir yandan da açıkça sergiler. Bu metni ortaya koyarkenedindiğimiz amaç, Van Gogh’un ayakkabı çizimleri üzerinden Meyer Schapiro ve Heideggertarafından ortaya koyulan yorumları değerlendirmektir. İki düşünürde olduğu gibi, buradada sorun ayakkabıları kimin giydiğidir: bir köylü mü, yoksa şehirli mi? Bu bağlamdaedineceğimiz izlenimler eserlerin hayatın içinde oldukları, ancak her yaşamsal arka planınonlara farklı bir nitelik kattığının sergilenmesidir. Tam da bu nedenle, mevcut eserlerin yanısıra Van Gogh’un diğer eserlerinde ortaya koyduğu tarz da incelenerek nihayet ayakkabılaradair özellikle Bataille üzerinden yeni bir yorumlama ortaya koyulmaya çalışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DERİN, Ö. (2022). SHOES AS A LIFE PROBLEM. Art-Sanat Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 177–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/450259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akın, S. Bir Çift Ayakkabı, (09.09.2011) (online), http://www.insanokur.org/?p=33634
  2. Antakyalıoğlu, Z. Başlık Yok, http://lebriz.com/pages/lsd.aspx?authorID=42&lang=ENG
  3. Artaud, A. (1993). Tiyatro ve İkizi, çev. Bahadır Gülmez, İstanbul: YKY. Bataille, (1997). Eros’un Gözyaşları, çev. M. Mukadder Yakupoğlu, İstanbul:
  4. Göçebe. Berman, M. (1996). Meyer Schapiro: The Presence of the Subject, New Politics, vol. 5, no. 4, whole no.20, Winter, http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue20/berman20.htm
  5. Cömert, B. (1976).
  6. Mitoloji ve İkonografi, Ankara:
  7. Meteksan Ltd.Şti. Dayna L. C. (2011). Interpreting a Painting of Shoes: The Benefits of a Deconstructionist Methodology, An Art Historical Impression. Derrida, (1987). The Truth In Painting, trans. by Geoff Bennington – Ian McLeod, Restitutions, London: The University of Chicago Press,. Edwards, C. (n.d.). The Shoes of Van Gogh, (online), http://www.dreamersoftheday.eu/auvers/literature/the-shoes-of-van-gogh
  8. Eyigör, F. (2009). Ayakkabının Fırlatıl(-a-ma)ması. (online) feyigor-arttick.blogspot.com/2013/02/ayakkabnn-frlatl-ma-masun-able-to-throw.html Hamsun K., (1920). Hunger, trans. by G. Egerton, NY: Alfred Knopf Inc. Heidegger, (2007). Sanat Eserinin Kökeni, çev. Fatih Tepebaşlı, Ankara:
  9. De Ki Basım Yayım. Hollinsworth, M. (2009). Dünya Sanat Tarihi, çev. Doç. Dr. Rengin Küçükerdoğan –Banu Ergüder, İstanbul:
  10. İnkılap. Horton, S. (2009). Philosophers Rumble Over Van Gogh’s Shoes, Harper’s Magazine. Kacian, J., (2008). Van Gogh’s Shoes: Thingness in Haiku, Valley Voices: A Literary Review 8:1, Mississippi Valley State University, Spring 2008, pp. 60-61, (online), http://www.gendaihaiku.com/kacian/van-goghs-shoes.html
  11. Kranz, W. (1984).
  12. Antik Felsefe, Çev: Suad Y. Baydur, İstanbul:
  13. Sosyal Yayınları.
  14. Mancoff, D.N. (n.d.). Post-Impressionism, Field and Flowers, (online), http://www.allart. org/impressionism/van_Gogh1.html McClure, C. (2007). Van Gogh’s Shoes, (online) http://chrismcclure.blogspot.com.tr/2007/07/van-goghs-shoes.html Miller,C. (n.d.). Meyer Schapiro: Frontal and Profile as Symbolic Forms, Early Morning Discussions, (online), http://aesthetics-l.blogspot.com.tr/2012/07/meyer-schapirofrontal- and-profile-as.html Perl, J. (2006). The Varieties of Artistic Experience, (online) http://www.newrepublic.com/article/meyer-schapiro-art-history-clement-greenberg
  15. Quigley, T. (n.d.). Notes on Meyer Shapiro, “The Nature of Abstract Art”, (online), http://timothyquigley.net/vcs/schapiro-naa_notes.pdf Sanat Ansiklopedisi, (1991