SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Evaluatıon of Measurement Methods used for Tooth Mobılıty and Implant Stabılıty

Diş Mobilitesi ve İmplant Stabilitesi için Kullanılan Ölçüm Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi

Fariz SALIMOV
Şahin BARIŞ
Masoud DALILI
Elif Figen KOÇAK
Pages
130–139
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This literature review aims to examine the techniques for measuring the stability and mobility of implants and teeth and to compare their reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobility in natural teeth and primer stability in implants are parameters evaluated by similar methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Until today, mobility of natural teeth has been classified in different ways by many researchers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This literature review aims to examine the techniques for measuring the stability and mobility of implants and teeth and to compare their reliability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobility in natural teeth and primer stability in implants are parameters evaluated by similar methods. Until today, mobility of natural teeth has been classified in different ways by many researchers. With the development of technology, these scales maintain their reliability but digital measurement devices such as Periotest have taken their place in the field. Similar to natural teeth, implant stability can be assessed objectively using a number of technological methods, such as periotest or radiofrequency analysis (RFA) along with conventional scales, in assessing implant stability. This literature review aims to examine the techniques for measuring the stability and mobility of implants and teeth and to compare their reliability.

Özet

Doğal dişlerde mobilite ve implantlarda primer stabilite, birbirine benzer yöntemler ile değerlendirilen parametrelerdir.Doğal dişlerin mobilitesi günümüze kadar birçok araştırmacı tarafından farklı şekillerde sınıflandırılmıştır. Teknolojiningelişmesi ile bu skalalar güvenilirliklerini korumakla beraber Periotest gibi dijital ölçüm cihazları da alanda kendilerineyer edinmişlerdir. İmplant stablitesi değerlendirilmesinede, doğal dişlere benzer olarak, geleneksel skalalarkla beraberperiotest veya radyofrekans analizi (RFA) gibi birçok teknolojik yöntemle implant stabilitesi objektif olarakdeğerlendirilebilmektedir. Bu literatür derlemesinde implantların ve dişlerin stabilite ve mobilite değerlerini ölçenteknikleri incelemek ve güvenilirliklerini karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALIMOV, F., BARIŞ, Ş., DALILI, M., KOÇAK, E. F. (2022). Evaluatıon of Measurement Methods used for Tooth Mobılıty and Implant Stabılıty. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 130–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/449141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. Journal of Dentistry. 2010;38:612-20
  2. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C, Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potensial prognostic factors for oral implant failures, International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2005;20:220-30
  3. Romanos GE. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience. Implant Dentistry. 2009;18:203–9
  4. Romanos GE, Testori T, Degidi M, Piattelli A. Histologic and histomorphometric findings from retrieved, immediately occlusally loaded implants in humans. Journal of Periodontology. 2005;76:1823–32
  5. Lekholm U, Zarb G, Patient selection and preparation In Branemark PI, editor, Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintissence. 1985;199-209
  6. Trisi, P. & Rao, W. Bone classification: clinicalhistomorphometric comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1999;10:1–7
  7. Misch, C.E. (2008) Part 1. Rationale for implants, 3. Diagnostic imaging and techniques. In: Misch, C.B., ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, St. Louis: Mosby Year Book. 2008;38-67
  8. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoǧlan M, Öztunç H, Kurtoǧlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: A clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2014;25:1016-21
  9. Mühlemann H.R, Tooth Mobility, The measuring method, Initial and secondary mobility, Journal of Periodontology 1954;25:22-9
  10. Miller SC. Textbook of Periodontia. 3rd ed. Blakiston Co. Philadelphia. 1950;101
  11. Lindhe J, Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 4th Ed., Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford (Malden). 2003;352-65
  12. Carranza FA, Clinical Periodontology. 9th. Ed., Newman MG:. WB Saunders, Philedelphia, 2002;438-9
  13. Svanberg G. Influence of trauma from occlusion on the periodontium of dogs with normal or inflamed gingivae. Odontologisk Revy. 1974;25:165-78
  14. Svanberg G, Lindhe J. Experimental tooth hypermobility in the dog: a methodological study. Odontologisk Revy. 1974; 24:269- 82
  15. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Lack of effect of trauma from occlusion on the recurrence of experimental periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1977;4:115
  16. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Lack of significance of increased tooth mobility i