Journals / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale

Pages
15–20
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Turkish version of the “ISS” is a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate the degree of motivation of the individual by his/her spirituality, which is also defined as his/her relationship with God.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was conducted to adapt “The Intrinsic Spirituality Scale (ISS)” into Turkish and to find out its validity and reliability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This methodological study was carried out with 289 individuals aged 18 and older who were reached online (e-mail, whatsapp, facebook, and instagram) between September 10 and 30, 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Turkish version of the “ISS” is a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate the degree of motivation of the individual by his/her spirituality, which is also defined as his/her relationship with God.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to adapt “The Intrinsic Spirituality Scale (ISS)” into Turkish and to find out its validity and reliability. Material and Methods: This methodological study was carried out with 289 individuals aged 18 and older who were reached online (e-mail, whatsapp, facebook, and instagram) between September 10 and 30, 2020. The questionnaire form prepared via docs.google.com/forms was sent online to individuals (e-mail and whatsapp). The items of the scale are scored between 0 and 10 and the scale has 6 items. Following the translation process of the scale, content and construct validity were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed for construct validity, while item analyses and internal consistency analysis were performed for reliability. Results: As a result of the evaluations and analyses conducted, content validity index of the scale was found as 0.99. Total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was found as 0.90. Item loads were found to be between 0.71 and 0.90 and item-total correlation coefficients were found to be between 0.61 and 0.79. The results of EFA and CFA confirmed the single factor structure of the scale. Good fit indices were found as a result of CFA. Conclusion: Turkish version of the “ISS” is a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate the degree of motivation of the individual by his/her spirituality, which is also defined as his/her relationship with God.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, G. B., ÖZER, Z., YANMIŞ, S. (2022). Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 15–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/447855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Guerrero-Castañeda RF, Menezes TMO, Prado MLD, Galindo-Soto JA. Spiritu- ality and religiosity for the transcendence of the elderly being. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019
  2. 72(suppl 2):259-265. [CrossRef] 2. Kasapoğlu F. Development of spiritual orientation scale: the study of validity and reliablility. Inonu Univ J Fac Educ. 2016
  3. 16(3):51-68. [CrossRef] 3. Morrison JQ, Clutter SM, Pritchett EM, Demmitt A. Perceptions of clients and counseling professionals regarding spirituality in counseling. Couns Values. 2009
  4. 53(3):183-194. [CrossRef] 4. Lepherd L. Spirituality: everyone has it, but what is it? Int J Nurs Pract. 2015
  5. 21(5):566-574. [CrossRef] 5. Hodge DR, Zidan T, Husain A. Validation of the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale (ISS) with Muslims. Psychol Assess. 2015
  6. 27(4):1264-1272. [CrossRef] 6. Kaçal Z, Demirsoy N. Spiritual assessment in intensive care patients. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2018
  7. 8(2):170-175. [CrossRef] 7. Ozdogan O. Spirituality Is Our Side of Love. 2th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Ozde- noze Publishing
  8. İnce SÇ, Akhan LU. Nursing students’ perceptions about spirituality and spiritual care. HEAD. 2017
  9. 10(3):1136-1147. [CrossRef] 9. Kostak M, Celikkalp U, Demir Dogan M. The opinions of nurses and mid- wifes about spirituality and spiritual care. J Maltepe Univ J Nurs Sci Art. 2010
  10. 9(3):218-225. 10. Hardt J, Schultz S, Xander C, Becker G, Dragan M. The spirituality question- naire: core dimensions of spirituality. Psychology. 2012
  11. 03(1):116-122. [CrossRef] 11. Sirin T. Spirituality scale: development, validity and reliability. J Turk Stud. 2018
  12. 13(18):1283-1309. [CrossRef] 12. Yagli N, Ozdogan O. A qualitative research on Gazians and their relations for the determinaion of spiritual care needs. J Anal Divin. 2019
  13. 3(2):67-100. 13. Kavas E, Kavas N. Spiritual support perception (MDA) scale: development, validity and reliability. Int Period Lang Lit Hist Turkish or Turkic. 2014
  14. 9(2):905-915. 14. Yilmaz M, Okyay N. Views related to spiritual care and spirituality of nurses. J Res Dev Nurs. 2009
  15. 11(3):41-52. 15. Ross L, McSherry W, Giske T, et al. Nursing and midwifery students’ percep- tions of spirituality, spiritual care, and spiritual care competency: a pro- spective, longitudinal, correlational European study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018
  16. [CrossRef] 16. Bayindir SK, Bicer S. Holistic nursing care. Izmir Katip Celeb Univ FAC Heal Sci J. 2019
  17. 4(1):25-29. 17. Ozer Z, Yildirim D, Akince EK, Boluktas RP. The nurses’ spiritual care prac- tices in palliat