SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Nursing Students’ Sexual Myths

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinde Cinsel Mitlerin Belirlenmesi

Filiz DEĞİRMENCİ
Duygu VEFİKULUÇAY YILMAZ
Tuba GÜNER EMÜL
Aysu BULDUM
Asiye UZEL
Ahu AKSOY
Aslıhan AKSU
Pages
8–14
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A negative significant linear relation was detected between the SMS total scores and students’ ages (r=−216, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was carried out to determine the levels and affecting factors of nursing students’ belief in sexual myths.Materials and Methods: This descriptive study included 376 students, that is, 190 freshman and 186 senior students, studying in a nursing department of a public university in the Mersin province between March, 20 and April 17, 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study data were gathered using a questionnaire and the Sexual Myths Scale (SMS).Results: The average age of 376 students was 20.60±2.34 years, and 66% of them were women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A negative significant linear relation was detected between the SMS total scores and students’ ages (r=−216, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study was carried out to determine the levels and affecting factors of nursing students’ belief in sexual myths.Materials and Methods: This descriptive study included 376 students, that is, 190 freshman and 186 senior students, studying in a nursing department of a public university in the Mersin province between March, 20 and April 17, 2017. The study data were gathered using a questionnaire and the Sexual Myths Scale (SMS).Results: The average age of 376 students was 20.60±2.34 years, and 66% of them were women. It was determined that the SMS total score average was 65.86±22.11. A statistically significant difference was found between the SMS total score averages and student’s gender, classes, place where the student lived the longest, parent’s working status, and the place from which the first sexual information was received. A negative significant linear relation was detected between the SMS total scores and students’ ages (r=−216, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, hemşirelik öğrencilerinde cinsel mitler ve etkili faktörlerin belirlenmesi için yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu tanımlayıcı çalışma, 20 Mart-17 Nisan 2017 tarihleri arasında Mersin ilinde bulunan bir devlet üniversitesinin hemşirelik bölümünde öğrenim gören 190 birinci sınıf ve 186 son sınıf olmak üzere 376 öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın verileri anket formu ve Cinsel Mitler Ölçeği (CMÖ) ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan birinci ve dördüncü sınıfta öğrenim gören 376 öğrencinin yaş ortalaması 20,60±2,34, %66’sı kadındır. Öğrencilerin CMÖ toplam puan ortalamasının 65,86±22,11 olduğu saptanmıştır. Öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine, sınıflarına, uzun süre yaşadıkları yere, anne ve babalarının çalışma durumlarına ve cinsellikle ilgili ilk bilgi aldıkları yere göre CMÖ toplam puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİ, F., YILMAZ, D. V., EMÜL, T. G., BULDUM, A., UZEL, A., AKSOY, A., AKSU, A. (2022). Determination of Nursing Students’ Sexual Myths. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 8–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/447942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Stearns P. Sexuality in World History, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2017, p.11-19. [CrossRef] 2. Gülsün M, Ak M, Bozkurt A. Marriage and sexuality from the psychiatric aspect. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 2009
  2. World Health Organization [Internet]. Developing sexual health programmes. Geneva. [2010
  3. Cited: 2017 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/rhr_hrp_10_22/en/ 4. Cinsel Egitim Tedavi ve Arastirma Dernegi [Internet]. Sexual life and problems. Turkey: Association for Sexual Education Treatment and Research. [2006
  4. Cited: 2017 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.cetad.org.tr/CetadData/Book/5/2692011151611bilgilendirme_dosyasi_1.pdfCETAD 5. Evcili F, Gobasi Z. Sexual violence: myths and facts. Turkiye Klinikleri J Obstet Womens Health Dis Nurs-Special Topics 2016
  5. Hassan EA, Creatsas GC. A Development milestone or risk-taking behavior? the role of health care in the prevention of sexuality transmitted diseases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2000
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Snegroff S. No sexuality education is sexuality education. Family Planning Perspectives 2000
  7. [CrossRef] 8. Uncu Y. Sexual myths. Turkiye Klinikleri J Fam Med-Special Topics 2015
  8. Cinsel Sağlık Enstitüsü Derneği [Internet]. Sexual myths. Turkey: Association of Sexual Health Institute. [2008
  9. Cited: 2017 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.cised.org.tr/sayfa146.html. 10. Özmen EH. Sexual myths and sexual dysfunctions. Psikiyatri Dünyası 2000
  10. İncesu C. Sexual Functions and Sexual Dysfunctions. Clin Psychiatry 2004
  11. Pınar G, Doğan N, Ökdem S, Algıer L, Öksüz E. Information, attitudes and behaviors related to the sexual health of students studying at a private university. Med Res J 2009
  12. Karabulutlu O, Kılıç M. Determination of the knowledge level of university students about sexual health, reproductive health. J Anatolian Nurs Health 2011
  13. Özan S, Aras S, Semin S, Orçin E. Sexual attitudes and behaviors of medical faculty students of Dokuz Eylul University. DEU Med J 2004
  14. Çivil B, Yıldız H. Male students’ sexual experiences and opinions on sexual taboos in society. DEUHYOED 2010
  15. Güneş M, Akçalı H, Dede O, Okan A, Bulut M, Demir S, et al. The level of believing in sexual myths in premature ejaculation cases. Dicle Med J 2016
  16. Torun F, Torun, SD, Ozaydin AN. The ratios of belief in sexual