Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs

Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retrospektif değerlendirilmesi

Pages
45–48
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the 20.3% of the suspicious samples, in cats 21.9% and in dogs 19.6% dermatophytosis agents were isolated and identified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For the aim of retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs, in this study, the samples taken from 164 cats and 357 dogs which came to University of Ankara, Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Microbiology with dermatophytosis suspicion between the year 1998 and 2003, were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Overall, the 20.3% of the suspicious samples, in cats 21.9% and in dogs 19.6% dermatophytosis agents were isolated and identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows no difference of any seasonal trend in dermatophytosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

For the aim of retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs, in this study, the samples taken from 164 cats and 357 dogs which came to University of Ankara, Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Microbiology with dermatophytosis suspicion between the year 1998 and 2003, were investigated. Overall, the 20.3% of the suspicious samples, in cats 21.9% and in dogs 19.6% dermatophytosis agents were isolated and identified. Microsporum spp. found to be the most isolated agent (60.4%) and Trichophyton spp. (39.6%) was also isolated as the agent of dermatophytosis. This study shows no difference of any seasonal trend in dermatophytosis.

Özet

Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarının retrospektif değerlendirilmesi amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmada, 1998-2003 yılları arasında Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı'na dermatofıtoz şüphesi ile getirilen 164 kedi ve 357 köpekten alınan örnekler incelendi. Dermatofıtoz şüpheli örneklerden toplamda %20.3 olmak üzere, kedilerden %21.9 ve köpekler-den ise %19.6 oranında dermatofıtoz etkenleri izole ve identifıye edildi. Kedi ve köpeklerde Microsporum spp.'nin izolasyon oranı (%60.4), Trlchophyton spp.'den (%39.6) daha yüksek olarak bulundu. Ayrıca, mevsimsel olarak dermatofıtoz oluşumunda farklılığa rastlanmadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

İÇA, T., MÜŞTAK, H. K., SAREYYÜPOĞLU, B., ÇİFTCİ, A. (2022). Retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 45–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/445214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aho R (1980): Studies on fungal flora in hair from domestic and laboratory animals suspected of dermatophytosis. I. Dematophytes. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B], 88, 79-83. 2.Arda M (2000): Preparat ve Kültür Hazırlama Yöntemle ri. 356-357. In: M Arda, Temel Mikrobiyoloji. 2.Baskı.
  2. Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara. 3.Badillet G (1977): Population of Paris and dermdtophytes transmitted by animals. Boll Soc Fr Mycol Med, 6, 109-114. 4.Barbee ML, Taylor JW (1992): Detecting morphological convergence in true fungi, using 18S rRNA gene sequence data. BioSystemsr 28, 117-125. 5.Bourdzi-Hatzopoulou E (1978): Zooanthroponoses in Greece. Epidemiology of dermatophytosis. Scientific Yearbook of the Veteriner Faculty (1978-1979), 19, 195-258. 6.Cabanes FJ, Abarca ML, Bragulat MR (1997): Dermatopytes isolated from domestic animals in Barcelona.Spain. Mycopathol, 137, 107-113. 7.Caretta G, Mancianti F, Ajello L (1989): Dermatophytes and keratinophilic fungi in cats and dogs. Mycoses, 32, 620-626. 8.Haseqawa M, Lida Y, Yano T, Takaiwa F, Iwabuchi M (1985): Phylogenetic relationships among eukaryotic kingdoms inferred from ribosomal RNA Sequences. J Mol Evol, 22,32-38. 9.Kaplan W, Georg LK, Ajello L (1958): Recent developments in animal ringworm and their public health implications.Ann NY Acad Sci, 70, 636-649. 10.Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M (2003): Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses, 46, 222-226. 11.Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC (1997): Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5. Ed. Lippincott-Raven publishers. Philedelphia. pp:983-985. 12.Kristensen S, Krogh HV (1981): A study of skin diseases in dogs and cat. VII. Ringworm infection. Nord Vet Med, 33,134-140. 13.Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Cecchi S, Corazza M, Taccini F (2002): Dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats in Tuscany, Italy during 15-year-period. Mycopathol, 156, 13-18. 14.Moriello KA (2001): Diagnostic techniques for dermatophytes. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract, 16, 219-224 15.Pintori G, Cubeddu GM, Giola L, Pellegrini M (1986): Dermatomycosis of the cat and dog. Boll Assoc It Vet Piccol Animal, 25, 307-312. 16.Radford A (1993): A fungal phylogeny based upon orotodine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase. J Mol Evol, 36, 385-395. 17.Sparkes AH, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Shaw SE, Wright AI, Stokes CR (1993): Epidemiological and diagnostic features of canine and feline dermatophytes in the UK from 1956 to 1991. Vet Rec, 133, 57-61. 18.Stenwig H (1985): Isolation o