SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Detection of subclinical mastitis by clinical, microbiological and biochemical methods in sheep

Koyunlarda klinik, mikrobiyolojik ve biyokimyasal metotlar ile subklinik mastitislerin saptanması

Mustafa KAYMAZ
Pir İlknur YAĞCI
Pages
31–35
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In milk samples bacteriologically positive , SCC was measured as 300.000-1.000.000 and in milk samples bacteriologically negative

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and aetiology of subclinical ovine mastitis in Kırıkkale and to study the changes occurring in the level of chlorine, sodium, ALP, LDH and NA-Gase, SCC and California Mastitis Test (CMT) scores in milk as a result of subclinical mastitis in 200 sheep.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Coagulase negative staphylococci were isolated in 5.5% of the milk samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In milk samples bacteriologically positive , SCC was measured as 300.000-1.000.000 and in milk samples bacteriologically negative
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and aetiology of subclinical ovine mastitis in Kırıkkale and to study the changes occurring in the level of chlorine, sodium, ALP, LDH and NA-Gase, SCC and California Mastitis Test (CMT) scores in milk as a result of subclinical mastitis in 200 sheep. Coagulase negative staphylococci were isolated in 5.5% of the milk samples. The period insidence of subclinical mastitis was detected as 6,5%. Milk samples from noninfected udder halves were found to have variable CMT scores. In milk samples bacteriologically positive , SCC was measured as 300.000-1.000.000 and in milk samples bacteriologically negative

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, koyunlarda subklinik mastitisin insidansım, etiyolojisini ve subklinik mastitis sonucu sütteki klor $(Cl^-)$ , sodyum $(Na^+)$ , ALP, LDH ve-NA-Gaz düzeyindeki, SHS ve CMT skorlarındaki değişimleri tespit etmektir. Örneklerin %5.5'inde koagulaz negatif stafilokoklar izole edildi. Subklinik mastitisin prevalansı %6.5 seviyesinde belirlendi. Normal örneklerdeki CMT sonuçları değişken bulundu. Somatik hücre sayısı subklinik mastitisli örneklerde 300.000-1.000.000 ve normal örneklerde

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYMAZ, M., YAĞCI, P. İ. (2022). Detection of subclinical mastitis by clinical, microbiological and biochemical methods in sheep. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/445193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Alaçam E (1997): Meme Hastalıkları, (in): E. Alaçam ve M. Şahal, Sığır Hastalıkları. Medisan, Ankara. 389-425. 2.Alais C (1974): Science du Lait.(ln): Principles des Techiniques Laiteres. Editeus Boulevard, Paris. 3.Albenzio M, Taibi L, Muscio A, Sevi A (2002): Prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in intensively managed floes and related changes in the yield and quality of ewe milk. Small Rum Res, 43, 219-226. 4.Batavani RA, Mortaz E, Falahian K, Dawoodi MA (2003): Study on frequency, a etiology and some enzymatic activities of subclinical ovine mastitis in Urmia, Iran. Small Rum Res, 50, 45-50. 5.Batu A, Fırat G (1981): Trakya ve Marmara Bölgesinde koyunlarda klinik ve subklinik mastitis ve etkenleri üzerine araştırma. Pendik Vet Mikrob Araş Ens Derg, 13, 11-21. 6.Baysal T, Kenar B (1989): Konya ve yöresindeki koyun larda klinik ve subklinik mastitis olgularından aerob etken izolasyon ve identifıkasyonu. Etlik Vet Mikrob Derg, 6, 55-56. 7.Bergonier D, Berthelot X (2003): New advances in epizootiology and control of ewe mastitis. Livestock Prod Sci, 79, 1-16. 8.Bergonier D, De Cremoux R, Rupp R, Lagriffoul G, Berthelot X (2003): Mastitis of dairy small ruminats. Vet Res, 34,689-716. 9.Billon P, Decremoux R (1998): Mastitis of dairy ewes: etiology, detection and control. 4th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium, 25-27 June 1998,
  2. Spooner, Wisconsin, USA. 10.Bogin E, Ziv G (1973): Enzymes and minerals in normal andmastitic milk. Cornell Vet, 63, 666-676. 11.Dela Cruz M, Serrano E, Monotoro U, Marco J, Romeo M, Baselga R, Albizu I, Amorena B (1994): Etiology and prevalence of subclinical mastitis in the Manchega sheep at mid-late lactation. Erişim: [http://www.elsevier.nl/gejng/abstract.htmll. Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2001. 12.Ergun H, Mert N (1984): Sütte mastitis nedeniyle meyda na gelen biyokimyasal değişmeler. I. Mastitis Semineri, 24 Kasım 1984, Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Ankara, 49-61 13.Fthenakis GC, El-Massanat ETS, Booth JM, Jones JET (1991): Somatic cell counts of ewes milk. Br Vet J, 147,575-581. 14.Gonzalez-Rodriguez MC, Gonzalo C, San Primitivo F, Carmenes P (1995): Relationship between somatic cell count and intramammary infection of the half udder in dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci, 78, 2753-2759. 15.Green TJ (1984): Use of somatic cell counts for detection of subclinical mastitis in ewes. Vet Rec, 114, 43-49. 16.Henry RJ (1974): Clinical Chemistry Principles and Technics, 2nd Ed., Harper Collins, Hagerstown. 17.Houeston VD, Hartwig