Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

RFLP typing of infectious bursal disease virus strains detected in Turkey

Türkiye' de saptanan infeksiyöz bursal hastalık virus suşlarının RFLP ile tiplendirilmesi

Pages
129–136
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, AGID test was found to be an appropriate test for the routine identification of IBDV strains from bursa samples and RT/PCR-RFLP test could be used for the molecular typing of IBDV virus strains in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, identification of IBDVs encountered in Turkey by agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) and reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) test and molecular typing of IBDV strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay were aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, a total of 122 bursa Fabricii from 24 flocks showing the symptoms of IBD, reared in the restricts of Adana, Bolu, Bursa, Çorum and Eskişehir were investigated for the existance of viral antigens and the viral RNAs by AGID and RT/PCR tests, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, AGID test was found to be an appropriate test for the routine identification of IBDV strains from bursa samples and RT/PCR-RFLP test could be used for the molecular typing of IBDV virus strains in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, identification of IBDVs encountered in Turkey by agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) and reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) test and molecular typing of IBDV strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay were aimed. For this reason, a total of 122 bursa Fabricii from 24 flocks showing the symptoms of IBD, reared in the restricts of Adana, Bolu, Bursa, Çorum and Eskişehir were investigated for the existance of viral antigens and the viral RNAs by AGID and RT/PCR tests, respectively. Molecular typing of RT/PCR positive IBDV samples by RFLP analysis using BstNl, Mbol and Sspl restriction enzymes was performed. After AGID tests, 102 (83.6 %) of 122 bursal samples from 24 flocks were found to have IBDV antigens. After RT/PCR tests, 47 (38.5 %) out of 122 bursa samples were found to have IBDV RNA while 75 (61.5 %) were not. Following RFLP analysis of RT/PCR positive samples, two different molecular patterns were detected. Following the restriction endonuclease analysis performed with Sspl enzyme, these were found to have similar molecular patterns with the European very virulent IBDVs (vvIBDVs). As a conclusion, AGID test was found to be an appropriate test for the routine identification of IBDV strains from bursa samples and RT/PCR-RFLP test could be used for the molecular typing of IBDV virus strains in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de İnfeksiyöz Bursal Hastalığa (IBD) neden olan viruslarm ağar jel immunodifuzyon testi (AGID) ve reverz transkripsiyon/polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (RT/PCR) ile saptanması ve IBDV suşlarının RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) analizi ile moleküler tiplendirilmesi amaçlandı. Bu amaçla, çeşitli bölgelerdeki 24 sürüye ait toplam 122 adet bursa Fabricius materyali IBDV antijenlerinin varlığı yönünden AGID testi, IBDV viral RNA'sının varlığı yönünden ise RT/PCR testi ile değerlendirildi. RT/PCR sonucunda pozitif olduğu belirlenen virus örneklerinin moleküler tiplendirilmesi, BsiNl, Mbol ve Sspl enzimlerinin kullanıldığı RFLP tekniği ile yapıldı. AGID testleri sonucunda incelenen 24 sürüye ait toplam 122 adet örneğin 102 (% 83.6)'si IBDV yönünden pozitif bulundu. Bursa Fabricius örneklerinden izole edilen RNA'lara uygulanan RT/PCR testi sonucunda, 24 sürüye ait toplam 122 adet materyalin 47 (% 38.5)'sinde viral genetik materyal saptandı. RT/PCR testiyle saptanan IBDV suşlarının RFLP analizi sonucunda birbirinden farklı moleküler yapı gösteren iki farklı virus susu belirlendi. Bu suşlarm Sspl enzimi ile incelenmesi sonucunda bunların Avrupa'da gözlenen yüksek virulensteki suşlarla benzer moleküler yapıya sahip oldukları ortaya kondu. Sonuç olarak, AGID testinin IBDV suşlarının rutin identifıkasyonu için uygun bir test olduğu, RT/PCR-RFLP testinin ise IBDV viruslarınm tiplendirilmesinde kullanılabileceği belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAREYYÜPOĞLU, B., İZGÜR, M. (2022). RFLP typing of infectious bursal disease virus strains detected in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 129–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/445190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ası Y, İyisan AS (1991): İnfeksiyöz bursal disease 'e (IBD, Gumboro) karşı aşılı etçi piliçlerde ELISA yöntemi ile an tikor düzeyinin saptanması ve QAGP yöntemi ile karşılaş tırılması. Pendik Hay Hast Merk Araşt Enst Derg, 22, 107-121. 2.Bayliss CD, Spies U, Shaw K, Peters RW, Papageorgion A, Müller H, Boursnell MEG (1990): A comparison of the sequences of segment A of four infectious bursal disease virus strains and identification of a variable region in VP2. J Gen Virol, 71, 1303-1312. 3.Brown MD, Green P, Skinner MA (1994): VP2 sequences of recent European 'very virulent' isolates of infectious bursal disease virus are closely related to each other but are distinct from those of 'classical strains'. J Gen Virol, 75, 675-680. 4.Çöven F (1995): Broyler ve Yumurtacı Tavuklarda Gum boro (Infectious Bursal Disease) Hastalığının İnsidensi ve Virus İzolasyonu. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Doktora Tezi. s. 66. 5.Çöven F, Çarlı T (1997): Türkiye'de broiler ve yumurtacı tavuklardan infectious bursal disease virüsünün izolasyon ve identifıkasyonu. Pendik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg, 28, 141-152. 6.Ergün A (1995): Klinik ve Subklinik Gumboro Vakala rından Virus İzolasyonu ve Serotiplendirilmesi. Selçuk Ü- niversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Doktora Tezi. s. 72. 7.Eterradossi N, Arnauld C, Tekaia F, Toquin D, Le Coq H, Rivallan G, Guittet M, Domenech J, van den Berg TP, Skinner MA (1999): Antigenic and genetic relationships between European very virulent infectious bursal disease viruses and an early West African isolate. Avian Pathol, 28, 36-46. 8.Heine H, Haritou M, Failla P, Fahey K, Azad A (1991): Sequence analysis and expression of the host-protective immunogen VP2 of a variant strain of infectious bursal disease virus which can circumvent vaccination with stan dart type I strains. J Gen Virol, 72, 1835-1843. 9.Hoque MM, Omar AR, Chong LK, Hair-Bejo M, Aini I (2001): Pathogenicity of Sspl-positive infectious bursal disease virus and molecular characterization of the VP2 hypervariable region. Avian Pathol, 30, 369-380. 10.Jackwood DJ, Nielsen CK (1997): Detection of infectious bursal disease viruses in commercially reared chickens using the reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction endonuclease assay. Avian Dis, 41, 137-143. 11.Jackwood DJ, Sommer SE (1997): Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the VP2 gene of infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Dis, 41, 627-637. 12.Jackwood DJ, Sommer SE (1998): Genetic heterogeneity in the VP2 gene of i