Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Yumurta tavuğu rasyonlarına maya hücre duvarı ilavesinin performans, yumurta kalitesi ve humoral immun yanıt üzerine etkileri

Effectsofdietary yeast cell wall on performance, egg quality and humoral immune response in laying hens

Pages
289–294
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result dietary YCW at the level of 1 and 2 g/kg had beneficial effects in the production of low cholesterol eggs and improvement in humoral immunity response.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to determine the effects of dietary yeast cell wall (YCW) on performance, egg quality, some blood parameters and humoral immune response of laying hens during 26 wks period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose a total of 225 Hyline Brown laying hens, 39 wks of age, were allocated to one control group and four treatment groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result dietary YCW at the level of 1 and 2 g/kg had beneficial effects in the production of low cholesterol eggs and improvement in humoral immunity response.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of dietary yeast cell wall (YCW) on performance, egg quality, some blood parameters and humoral immune response of laying hens during 26 wks period. For this purpose a total of 225 Hyline Brown laying hens, 39 wks of age, were allocated to one control group and four treatment groups. Basal diet was supplemented with YCW derived from bakers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (InteMOS) at the level of 1, 2, 3 and 4 g/kg in the diets of the first, second, third and fourth treatment groups, respectively. Dietary treatments did not significantly affect body weight, feed intake, egg production, egg weight, feed conversion, and egg internal and external quality characteristics. YCW supplementation at the level of 1 and 2 g/kg decreased egg yolk cholesterol level as mg per g yolk (P < 0.05). Blood serum levels of cholesterol and triglyceride were decreased with the dietary inclusion of YCW at the level of 2, 3 and 4 g/kg (P < 0.01). Dietary YCW supplementation increased antibody titres to SRBC (P < 0.01). As a result dietary YCW at the level of 1 and 2 g/kg had beneficial effects in the production of low cholesterol eggs and improvement in humoral immunity response.

Özet

Bu araştırma, yumurta tavuğu rasyonlarına maya hücre duvarı ilavesinin 26 hafta süreyle performans, yumurta kalitesi, bazı kan parametreleri ve humoral immun yanıt üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla 39 haftalık 225 adet Hyline kahverengi yumurta tavuğu 1 kontrol ve 4 deneme grubuna ayrılmıştır. Kontrol grubu rasyonuna ekmek mayası Saccharomyces cerevisiae (InteMOS)den elde edilen maya hücre duvarı 1, 2, 3 ve 4 g/kg düzeylerinde ilave edilerek sırasıyla birinci, ikinci, üçüncü ve dördüncü deneme grupları rasyonları oluşturulmuştur. Rasyonlara maya hücre duvarı ilavesi canlı ağırlığı, yem tüketimini, yumurta verimini, yumurta ağırlığını, yemden yararlanmayı ve yumurta iç kalite ile dış kalite özelliklerini etkilememiştir. Maya hücre duvarının 1 ve 2 g/kg düzeylerinde ilavesi ile yumurta kolesterol düzeyi (mg/g yumurta sarısı) azalmıştır (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ESER, H., YALÇIN, S., ONBAŞILAR, İ., YALÇIN, S., ŞAHİN, A. (2022). Yumurta tavuğu rasyonlarına maya hücre duvarı ilavesinin performans, yumurta kalitesi ve humoral immun yanıt üzerine etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 289–294. https://ajindex.com/articles/444960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abubakar A, Tukur HM, Sekoni AA, Hassan WA (2007): Performance and egg quality characteristics of laying birds fed diets containing rice bran with and without yeast supplementation. Asian J Anim Sci, 1, 1-9.
  2. ADAS (1981): The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, 2nd ed., Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK. AOAC (2000): Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, AOAC International, Maryland, USA. Ayanwale BA, Kpe M, Ayanwale VA (2006): The effect of supplementing Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the diets on egg laying and egg quality characteristics of pullets. Int J Poult Sci, 5, 759-763.
  3. Berry WD, Lui P (2000): Egg production, egg shell quality and bone parameters in broiler breeder hens receiving Bio Mos and Eggshell 49. Poultry Sci, 79 (Suppl 1):124 (Abstr). Card LE, Nesheim MC (1972): Poultry Production. 11th ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA. Carpenter KJ, Clegg KM (1956): The metabolizable energy of poultry feedingstuffs in relation to their chemical composition. J Sci Food Agric, 7, 45-51.
  4. Cotter PF, Sefton AE, Lilburn MS (2002): Manipulating the immune system of layers and breeders: Novel applications for mannan oligosaccharides. Pages 21-28 in Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries. T.P. Lyons and K.A. Jacques, ed. Nottingham University Pres, Nottingham, UK. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd ed., Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, USA. Day EJ, Dilworth BC, Omar S (1987): Effect of varying levels of phosphorus and live yeast culture in caged layer diets. Poultry Sci, 66, 1402-1410.
  5. Farese G, Schmidt JL, Mager M (1967): An automated method for the determination of serum calcium with glyoxal bis (2-hydroxyanil). Clin. Chem, 13, 515-520.
  6. Gürbüz E, Balevi T, Kurtoğlu V, Öznurlu Y (2011). Use of yeast cell walls and Yucca schidigera extract in layer hens’ diet. Ital J Anim Sci, 10, 134-138.
  7. Hosseini SA, Lotfollahian H, Kamyab, A, Mahdavi A (2006): Study on the effect of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC47) utilization on the commercial layer hen’s performance. Pak J Biol Sci, 9, 2346-2349.
  8. Jaehrig SC, Rohn S, Kroh LW, Wildenauer FX, Lisdat F, Fleischer LG, Kurz T (2008): Antioxidative activity of (1→3), (1→6)-β-D-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on different media. LWT- Food Sci Technol, 41, 868-877.
  9. Krasowska A, Kubik