SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Küçükbaş hayvan yetiştiricilerinin üyelik ilişkileri ve örgütsel etkinliklerinin sosyo-ekonomik bir analizi

Asocio-economic analysis organizational effectiveness relations andof small ruminant breeders' membership

Mehmet Ferit CAN
Pages
119–124
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A positive correlation was found between the total responsibility score and membership period (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Livestock Producers Organizations have played an important role in sustainable production and rural development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey was conducted in the Hatay province in Turkey with 38 small ruminant breeders to investigate organizational responsibilities and satisfaction levels, and to analyze the relationship between their socio-economic status with responsibility and satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A positive correlation was found between the total responsibility score and membership period (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Livestock Producers Organizations have played an important role in sustainable production and rural development. There is a strong relationship between breeders socio-economics status, membership relations, and organizational success levels. A survey was conducted in the Hatay province in Turkey with 38 small ruminant breeders to investigate organizational responsibilities and satisfaction levels, and to analyze the relationship between their socio-economic status with responsibility and satisfaction. The membership of breeders in any professional organization was found to be 68%, and the most important factor affecting participation in their organizations was bureaucratic reasons. Basic , Extended , and Totalresponsibilities of the small ruminant breeders were found to be 16%, 24%, and 20%, respectively, and satisfaction levels were very dissatisfied , dissatisfied and very dissatisfied , respectively. A positive correlation was found between the total responsibility score and membership period (p

Özet

Hayvancılık sektöründeki üretici örgütleri sürdürülebilir üretim ve kırsal kalkınmada önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Yetiştiricilerin sosyo-ekonomik statüleri ile üyelik ilişkileri ve örgütsel başarı düzeyleri arasında güçlü bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Örgütsel sorumluluk ve memnuniyet düzeyinin araştırılması ve sosyo-ekonomik statü ile sorumluluk ve memnuniyet düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin analizi amacıyla Hatay ilinde 38 küçükbaş hayvan yetiştiricisi ile anket çalışması yürütülmüştür. Herhangi bir örgüte üye olanların oranı %68 olarak bulunmuş, örgüte katılımı belirleyen en önemli faktörün bürokratik nedenler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Temel , Genişletilmiş ve Toplam sorumluluk ve memnuniyet düzeyleri sırasıyla %16, %24 ve %20; hiç memnun değilim , memnun değilim ve hiç memnun değilim olarak tespit edilmiştir. Toplam sorumluluk skoru ve üyelik süresi arasında pozitif bir korelasyon (p

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, M. F. (2022). Küçükbaş hayvan yetiştiricilerinin üyelik ilişkileri ve örgütsel etkinliklerinin sosyo-ekonomik bir analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/444812

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Alambeigi A, Zarifian S, Rezaei A (2008): Determinants of cattle farmers participation in farmers organization in Hamadan province of Iran. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research, 8, 125–133. Baghban AA, Younespour S, Jambarsang S, Yousefi M, Zayeri F, Jalilian FA (2013): How to test normality distribution for a variable: a real example and a simulation study. Journal of Paramedical Sciences, 4, 73–77. Bernard C (1994):
  2. The Function of Executive. Cambridge, Harward University Press,
  3. Cambridge, US. Bett HC, Bett HK, Kahi AK, Peters KJ (2009): Evaluation and effectiveness of breeding and production services of dairy goat farmers in Kenya. Ecological Economics, 68, 2451–2460. Budak DB, Darcan N, Kantar M (2005): Women farmers and extension services in small ruminant production in mountain areas of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 62, 507–515. Can MF, Sakarya E (2012): Dünya ve Türkiye’de Tarım ve Hayvancılık Kooperatiflerinin Tarihsel Gelişimi, İktisadi Önemi ve Mevcut Durumu. Vet Hekim Der Derg, 83, 27–36. Can MF (2013): The effect of cattle breeders’ socio-economic status on responsibility and satisfaction toward their organizations (ID: 365). The 31st World Veterinary Congress. 17-20 September, 2013,
  4. Prague, Czech Republic. Çetin B (2010): Agricultural Economics. 1st ed. Dora Publications, Bursa, Turkey. Dubeuf JP (2005): Structural, market and organizational conditions for developing goat dairy production systems. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 67–74. Fulton M, Giannakas G (2001): Organizational commitement in a mixed oligopoly: Agricultural cooperatives and investor-owned firms. Amer. J. Agr. Econ, 83, 1258–1265. Garcia CGM, Dorward P, Rehman T (2013): Factors influencing adoption of improved grassland management by small-scale dairy farmers in central Mexico and the imlications of future research on small holder adoption in developing countries. Livestock Science, 152, 228–238. Gedara KM, Wilson C, Pascoe S, Robinson T (2012): Factor affecting technical efficiency of rice farmers in village reservoir irrigation systems of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 627–638. Gürsoy O (2006): Economics and profitability of sheep and goat production in Turkey under new support regimes and market conditions. Small Ruminant Research, 62, 181–191. Mainer-Jaime RC, Vazquez-Boland JA (1999): Associations of veterinary services and farmer characteristics with the prevalences of brucellosis and border disease in small ruminants in Spain. Preventive V