SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Kent zararlılarının kontrolünde entomopatojenler

Entomopathogens incontrolofurban pests

Engin KILIÇ
Abdullah İNCİ
Ramazan CANHİLAL
Pages
155–160
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review emphases on the potential of different entomopathogens for bio-control of urban pests and brief information about microbial control agents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Entomopathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, rickettsia and nematodes are non-infective to vertebrates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These bacteria are able to kill the host within 24-48 hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review emphases on the potential of different entomopathogens for bio-control of urban pests and brief information about microbial control agents.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Entomopathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, rickettsia and nematodes are non-infective to vertebrates. There are lots of researches on their efficacy on urban pests. Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) is effective in controlling mosquitos and black flies, B. thuringiensis kurstaki and B. thuringiensis entomocidus controls Lepidoptera caterpillars. B. thuringiensis tenebrionis controls some beetle species. Most of viruses kill immature stages of Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera. Baculoviruses are specific to only a few pests of Lepidoptera and mosquitoes. Fungi have wide spectrum of hosts and the ability to enter via cuticle. They can infect many insects (Dictyoptera, Orthoptera, Dermoptera, Culicidae, Muscidae, Simulidae, Tabanidae, Cimicidae, Vespidae, Formicidae, Lepidoptera, Termitidae) and ticks (Ixodidae and Argasidae). The most common entomopathogenic fungus species are Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Protozoa are pathogenic for insect and some ticks. Nosema is the most common genus. However there is necessity to evaluate the potential of Nosema-Ixodidae and Nosema-Insect interactions for tick and insect bio-control. Rickettsias are obligatory intracellular organisms and some species affect ticks. Nematode species in the families of Steinernematidae (Steinernema spp., Neosteirnema spp.), Heterorhabditidae (Heterorhabditis spp.) and Mermithidae are effective on insects and ticks. Entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) carry the pathogenic bacteria (Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp.) in their intestines. These bacteria are able to kill the host within 24-48 hours. Some entomopathogens or microbial pathogens can be mass-produced, and suitable for commercial use. Current applications include control programs for agricultural, forest and urban pests. This review emphases on the potential of different entomopathogens for bio-control of urban pests and brief information about microbial control agents.

Özet

Virüsleri, bakterileri, fungusları, protozoaları, riketsiyaları ve nematodları içeren entomopatojenler omurgalı canlılar için enfektif değildir. Kent zararlılarına entomopatojenlerin etkinlikleri konusunda birçok çalışma vardır. Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) sivrisineklerin ve simuliidlerin mücadelesinde etkilidir. B. thuringiensis kurstaki ve B. thuringiensis entomocidus lepidopter zararlıları, B. thuringiensis tenebrionis ise bazı coleopter zararlıları kontrol eder. Virüslerin birçoğu lepidopter ve hymenopter larvalarını öldürür. Bakulovirüsler, lepidopter zararlıların ve sivrisineklerin sadece bir kaç tanesine özelleşmiştir. Funguslar, geniş bir konakçı aralığına sahiptir ve kütikuladan giriş yapabilirler. Birçok böceğe saldıran entomopatojen fungusların en yaygını Beauveria bassiana ve Metarhizium anisopliaedir. Protozoalar böcekler ve bazı keneler için patojeniktir. Nosema protozoaların en yaygın cinsidir. Ancak protozoalar ile biyolojik böcek ve kene mücadelesi için, Nosema-Ixodidae ve Nosema-insekt etkileşim potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesine ihtiyaç vardır. Riketsiyalar, obligat intraselüler organizmalardır ve bazı türleri keneleri etkiler. Steinernematidae (Steinernema spp., Neosteirnema spp.), Heterorhabditidae (Heterorhabditis spp.) ve Mermithidae familyalarındaki nematod türleri böcekler ve keneler üzerinde etkilidir. Entomopatojenik nematodlar (Steinernematidae ve Heterorhabditidae) bağırsaklarında patojenik bakteriler (Xenorhabdus spp. ve Photorhabdus spp.) taşırlar. Bu bakteriler konakçısını 24-48 saat içerisinde öldürme yeteneğindedirler. Bazı entomopatojenler veya mikrobiyal patojenler kitle halinde üretilebilirler ve ticari kullanım için uygundurlar. Mevcut uygulamalar, tarımsal, orman ve kent zararlılarının mücadelelerini içermektedir. Bu derlemede, farklı entomopatojenlerin kent zararlıları ile biyolojik mücadeledeki potansiyelleri ve mikrobiyal mücadele ajanları hakkında kısa bilgi verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, E., İNCİ, A., CANHİLAL, R. (2022). Kent zararlılarının kontrolünde entomopatojenler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 155–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/444783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al-Azawi B, Jabbr L (1989): The effects of different concentrations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on house fly Musca domestica L. Bull End Dis, 30, 69-73.
  2. Ali FS, Abdel Moneim AA, el Dahtory TA, Ssfwat MS, Abdallah AR (1986): Microbiological control of ticks. Zentralbl Microbiol, 141, 67-70.
  3. Appel LF, Prout M, Abu-Shumays R, Hammonds A, Garbe JC, Fristrom D, Fristrom J (1993): The Drosophila stubble-stubbloid gene encodes an apparent transmembrane serine protease required for epithelial morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90, 4937-4941.
  4. Balashovys YS (1971): Interrelationships between bloodsucking arthropods and rickettsia. Parasitologia, 5, 347-56.
  5. Becnel JJ, White SE (2007): Mosquito pathogenic viruses - the Last 20 Years. J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 23, 36-49.
  6. Belton P, Rutherford TA, Trotter DB, Webster JM (1987): Heterorhabditis heliothidis: A potential biological control agent of house flies in caged-layer poultry barns. J Nematol, 19, 263-266.
  7. Bhattacharya PR (1998): Microbial control of mosquitoes with special emphasis on bacterial control. Indian J Malariol 35, 206-224.
  8. Brown RS, Reichelderfer CF, Anderson WR (1970): An endemic disease among laboratory population of Dermasentor andersoni (D. venustus) (acarina:ixodidae). J Intertebr Pathol, 16,142-143.
  9. Burgdofer W, Ormsbee RA (1968): Development of Rickettsia prowazeki in certain species of ixodid ticks. Acta Virol, 12, 36-40.
  10. Cherepanova NP (1964): Fungi which are found on ticks. Bot Z Mosk, 49, l696-99. Darwish E, Zayed A (2002): Pathogenicity of two entomopathogenic hyphomycetes, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae, to the housefly Musca domestica L. J Egypt Soc Parasitol, 32, 785-796.
  11. Demirbag Z, Nalcacioglu R, Demir I, Sezen K, Erturk O (2008): Entomopatojenler ve biyolojik mucadele. ISBN: 978-975-93278-2-8,
  12. Esen offset mattbacilik, Trabzon. Federici BA, Tsao PW, Lucarotti CJ (1985): Coelomomyces (Fungi). 75-86. In: Chapman HC (Ed), Biological control of Mosquitoes, Bull No 6, Amer Mosq Contr Assoc. Friedhoff KT (1970): Microorganisms in engorged females of the tick Rhipicephalus bursa. Int Congr Parasitol, 56, 111. Garcia-Maruniak A, Maruniak JE, Farmerie W, Boucias DG (2008): Sequence analysis of a non-classified, nonoccluded DNA virus that causes salivary gland hypertrophy of Musca domestica, MdSGHV. Virology, 377, 184-186.
  13. Geden CJ, Lietze VU, Boucias DG (2008): Seasonal prevalence and transmission of salivary gland hypertrophy virus of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae). J Med Ent