Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3

Phenotypic and genotypic analysis for antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus species with chicken and gull origin

Tavuk ve martı kökenli enterokok türlerinin antibiyotik dirençliliğinin fenotipik ve genotipik analizi

Pages
235–244
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, for the first time in our region, this research has revealed the presence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, faecal samples of backyard chickens in the city of Van and its districts and gulls in contact with humans in Van Lake basin have been obtained and examined for Enterecoccus species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 1000 faecal samples have been obtained as 500 from chickens and 500 from gulls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, for the first time in our region, this research has revealed the presence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, faecal samples of backyard chickens in the city of Van and its districts and gulls in contact with humans in Van Lake basin have been obtained and examined for Enterecoccus species. For this purpose, 1000 faecal samples have been obtained as 500 from chickens and 500 from gulls. In the study, Entrerecoccus has been isolated and identified from a total of 311 (31.1%) faecal samples as 192 (38.4%) from chickens and 119 (23.8%) from gulls. 41 (21.3%) of chicken-origin isolates have been identified as Enterococcus faecalis, 110 (57.3%) as E. faecium, 9 (4.7%) as E. casseliflavus/gallinarum, 27 (14.1%) as E. hirae, 5 (2.6%) E. durans while 78 (65.5%) of gull-origin isolates have been identified as E. faecalis, 21 (17.6%) as E. faecium, 10 (8.4%) as E. hirae, 7 (5.9%) as E. casseliflavus/gallinarum, 2 (1.7%) as E. raffinosus and 1 (0.8%) as E. durans. Phenotypically antibiotic susceptibility testing (disc diffusion method) was performed for analysis. Genotypically 16S rRNA, 16S and 23S intergenic transcribed spacer region, esp, vanA, vanB and vanC (C-1, C-2, C-3) was analyzed genes. When antibiotic resistance of whole isolates have been taken into consideration; the highest level of resistance was determined to cefadroxil (99.5%) while the lowest resistance was determined to imipenem (0.8%). While 9 (2.9%) of the isolates have been determined as resistant to vancomycin; genotypically vancomycin resistance gene (van) has been determined 20 (6.4%) of the isolates. 6 of E. faecalis (1 chicken, 5 gull origin) and 3 of E. faecium (gull origin) isolates have been determined as carrying vanA, 6 E. casseliflavus/gallinarum as carrying vanC1 (2 chicken, 4 gull origin) and 5 E. casseliflavus/gallinarium (chicken origin) as carrying vanC2/3 gene. In gull isolates, while vanC2/3 gene was not determined in gull isolates; all chicken and gull origin isolates have been found negative for vanB gene. As a result, for the first time in our region, this research has revealed the presence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Van ili ve ilçelerinde halk elinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan tavuklardan ve Van Gölü Havzasının değişik noktalarında insanlarla ilişki halinde olan martı popülasyonlarından alınan dışkı örnekleri enterokok türleri açısından incelendi. Bu amaçla 500 tavuk ve 500 martı olmak üzere toplam 1000 adet dışkı örneği toplandı. Tavuk dışkı örneklerinden 192 (%38.4) ve martı dışkı örneklerinden ise 119 (%23.8) olmak üzere toplam 311 (%31.1) adet enterokok izole edildi. Tavuk orijinli izolatların 41 (%21.3)'i Enterococcus faecalis, 110 (%57.3)'u E. faecium, 9 (%4.7)'u E. casseliflavus/gallinarum, 27 (%14.1)'si E. hirae, 5 (%2.6)'i E. durans olarak identifiye edilirken; martı orijinlilerin 78 (%65.5)'i E. faecalis, 21 (%17.6)'i E. faecium, 10 (%8.4)'u E. hirae, 7 (%5.9)'si E. casseliflavus/gallinarum, 2 (%1.7)'si E. raffinosus, 1 (%0.8)'i E. durans olarak tanımlandı. Fenotipik analiz, antibiyogram testi (disk difüzyon yöntemi) ile yapıldı. Genotipik olarak ise 16S rRNA, 16S ve 23S arası bölgeler, esp, vanA, vanB ve vanC (C-1,C-2, C-3) genleri analiz edildi. Tüm izolatların antibiyotik dirençlilikleri dikkate alındığında, en fazla dirençlilik sefadroksil (%99.5) en az dirençlilik ise imipenem (%0.8) karşı saptandı. İzolatların 9 (%2.9)'u fenotipik olarak vankomisine dirençli bulunurken, 20 (%6.4)'sinde genotipik olarak vankomisin dirençlilik geni (van) belirlendi. Bunlardan 6 E. faecalis (1'i tavuk, 5'i martı orijinli) ve 3 E. faecium (martı orijinli) izolatının vanA, 6 E. casseliflavus/gallinarium izolatının vanC1 (2'si tavuk, 4'ü martı orijinli) ve 5 E. casseliflavus/gallinarium (tavuk orijinli) izolatının ise vanC2/3 geni taşıdığı tespit edildi. Martı izolatlarında vanC2/3 genlerine raslanılamazken, tavuk ve martı orijinli tüm izolatlar vanB geni açısından negatif bulundu. Sonuç olarak, bu araştırma ile bölgemizde ilk kez vankomisin dirençli enterokok türlerinin varlığı ortaya konuldu.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜL, Ö., GÜDÜCÜOĞLU, H., GÜLHAN, T. (2022). Phenotypic and genotypic analysis for antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus species with chicken and gull origin. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3, 235–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/444684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aarestrup FM, Agerso Y, Gerner-Smidt P, et al. (2000): Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broylers, and pigs in Denmark. Diag Micro Infect Dis, 37, 127-137
  2. Alp Ş, Şardan YÇ (2008): Vankomisine dirençli enterokokların epidemiyolojisi ve kontrolü. Hacettepe Med J, 39, 89-95
  3. Boyd DA, Willey BM, Fawcett D, et al. (2008): Molecular characterization of Enterococcus faecalis N06-0364 with low-level vancomycin resistance harboring a novel D-AlaD-Ser gene cluster, vanL. Antimicrob Agent Chemoter, 52, 2667-2672
  4. Brisse S, Fussing V, Ridwan B, et al. (2002): Automated ribotyping of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates. JCM, 40, 1977-1984
  5. CLSI (2011): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-first edition: Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. CLSI. Wayne, PA, USA
  6. Courvalin P (2006): Vancomycin resistance in Gram-positive cocci. CID, 42, 25-34
  7. De Leener E, Martel A, De Graef EM, et al. (2005): Molecular analysis of human, porcine, and poultry Enterococcus faecium isolates and their erm (B) genes. AEM, 71, 2766-2770
  8. Deshpande LM, Fritsche TR, Moet GJ, et al. (2007): Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from North America and Europe: a report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Diag Microb Infect Dis, 58, 163- 170
  9. Dilik Z, İstanbulluoğlu E (2010): Entansif broyler işletmeleri ile kırsal tavukçuluk işletmelerindeki hayvanlardan izole edilen enterokokların fenotipik ve genotipik özellikleri üzerine çalışmalar. Bornova Vet Bil Derg, 32, 37-46
  10. Doğru AK, Gençay YE, Ayaz ND (2010): Comparison of virulence gene profiles of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis chicken neck skin and faeces isolates. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 129-133
  11. Fahr AM, Eigner U, Armbrust M, et al. (2003): Twocenter collaborative evaluation of the performance of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. JCM, 41, 1135-1142
  12. Fortina MG, Ricci G, Mora D, et al. (2004): Molecular analysis of artisanal Italian cheeses reveals Enterococcus italicus sp. nov. IJSEM, 54, 1717-1721
  13. Frye JG, Jackson CR (2013): Genetic mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance identified in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and