Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 4

Determination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods using directplate counting, quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplificationand propidium monoazide-qLAMP

Deniz ürünlerinde Vibrio parahaemolyticus’un direkt kültür yöntemi, kantitatif ilmiğe dayalı izotermal amplifikasyon ve propidium monoazide-qLAMP ile belirlenmesi

Pages
349–355
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The CFUs of V. parahaemolyticus detected in qLAMP (5.96±0.10 log10 CFU/ml) and PMAqLAMP (4.71±0.13 log10 CFU/ml) were higher than those of DPC (1.99±0.44 log10 CFU/ml) (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most challenging aspects in culture independent methods for foodborne pathogens’ detection is discrimination of dead and live microorganisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 200 samples including finfishes (n= 100) and shrimps (n= 100), representing the Mediterranean, Black and Aegean sea were collected from supermarkets and fish markets of Konya-Turkey. qLAMP was performed in a Real-Time Turbidimeter and the time threshold (tt) values were yielded in 60 minutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The CFUs of V. parahaemolyticus detected in qLAMP (5.96±0.10 log10 CFU/ml) and PMAqLAMP (4.71±0.13 log10 CFU/ml) were higher than those of DPC (1.99±0.44 log10 CFU/ml) (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:200 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the most challenging aspects in culture independent methods for foodborne pathogens’ detection is discrimination of dead and live microorganisms. This study aimed to determine the Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods via direct plate counting (DPC) and toxR-based quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) and to discriminate dead and live cells using propidium monoazide (PMA)-qLAMP. A total of 200 samples including finfishes (n= 100) and shrimps (n= 100), representing the Mediterranean, Black and Aegean sea were collected from supermarkets and fish markets of Konya-Turkey. qLAMP was performed in a Real-Time Turbidimeter and the time threshold (tt) values were yielded in 60 minutes. On DPC, the colonies grown on TCBS Agar was further confirmed by conventional PCR based from gyrB1 gene of Vibrio spp. and toxR gene of V. parahaemolyticus. Virulence property of the isolates were determined by tdh based qLAMP. The detection limit of the qLAMP was 1.2×104 CFU/g in artificially contaminated seafoods. DPC, qLAMP and PMA-qLAMP detected V. parahaemolyticus in 8 (4%), 12 (6%) and 12 (6%) samples, respectively. The CFUs of V. parahaemolyticus detected in qLAMP (5.96±0.10 log10 CFU/ml) and PMAqLAMP (4.71±0.13 log10 CFU/ml) were higher than those of DPC (1.99±0.44 log10 CFU/ml) (P

Özet

Gıda kaynaklı patojenlerin kültür bağımsız yöntemlerle tespitinde en zorlu hususlardan biri ölü ve canlımikroorganizmaların ayırt edilmesidir. Bu çalışmada, deniz ürünlerinde V. parahaemolyticus varlığının direkt kültür yöntemi (DPC)ve toxR bazlı kantitatif ilmiğe dayalı izotermal amplifikasyon (qLAMP) ve canlı-ölü hücre ayrımı için propidium monoazide (PMA)- qLAMP yoluyla belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Akdeniz, Karadeniz ve Ege denizlerini temsil eden balık (n= 100) ve karides (n= 100) olmaküzere toplam 200 örnek, Konya-Türkiye’de bulunan süpermarketler ve balık hallerinden toplandı. Real-Time Turbidimetredegerçekleştirilen qLAMP reaksiyonunda time threshold (tt) değerleri, 60 dakika içinde elde edildi. DPC metodunda TCBS Agar'dagelişen kolonilerde Vibrio spp.’nin doğrulanması için gyrB1 genini, V. parahaemolyticus’un doğrulanması için de toxR geniniamplifiye eden konvansiyonel PCR yöntemi kullanıldı. İzolatların virülans özelliğinin belirlenmesinde tdh bazlı qLAMP kullanıldı.qLAMP'ın deneysel olarak kontamine edilen deniz ürünlerinde tespit limiti 1.2 x 104 CFU/g olarak belirlendi. DPC, qLAMP ve PMA qLAMP yöntemleri ile sırasıyla 8 (%4), 12 (%6) ve 12 (%6) örnekte V. parahaemolyticus tespit edildi. qLAMP (5.96 ± 0.10 log10 KOB/ml) ve PMA-qLAMP (4.71±0.13 log10 KOB/ml) yöntemlerinde tespit edilen V. parahaemolyticus sayılarının DPC yönteminegöre (1.99 ± 0.44 log10 KOB/ml) daha yüksek olduğu gözlemlendi (P

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRUER, Y. (2022). Determination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods using directplate counting, quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplificationand propidium monoazide-qLAMP. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 4, 349–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/444469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1992): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA
  2. Austin B (2010): Vibrios as causal agents of zoonoses. Vet Microbiol, 140, 310-317
  3. Bates TC, Oliver JD (2004): The viable but nonculturable state of Kanagawa positive and negative strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Microbiol, 42, 74-79
  4. Cai T, Jiang L, Yang C, et al (2006): Application of realtime PCR for quantitative detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from seafood in eastern China. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 46, 180-186
  5. Chao G, Jiao X, Zhou X, et al (2009): Distribution, prevalence, molecular typing, and virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from different sources in coastal province Jiangsu, China. Food Control, 20, 907-912
  6. Chen S, Ge B (2010): Development of a toxR-based loopmediated isothermal amplification assay for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiol, 10, 41
  7. Chen S, Wang F, Beaulieu JC, et al (2011): Rapid detection of viable Salmonellae in produce by coupling propidium monoazide with loop-mediated isothermal amplification (PMA-LAMP). Appl Environ Microbiol, 77, 4008-4016
  8. DePaola A, Ulaszek J, Kaysner CA, et al (2003): Molecular, serological, and virulence characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from environmental, food, and clinical sources in North America and Asia. Appl Environ Microbiol, 69, 3999-4005
  9. Du M, Chen J, Zhang X, et al (2007): Retention of virulence in a viable but nonculturable Edwardsiella tarda isolate. Appl Environ Microbiol, 73, 1349-1354
  10. Ducret A, Chabalier M, Dukan S (2014): Characterization and resuscitation of ‘non-culturable’cells of Legionella pneumophila. BMC Microbiol, 14, 3
  11. Fang J, Wu Y, Qu D, et al (2018): Propidium monoazide real‐time loop‐mediated isothermal amplification for specific visualization of viable Salmonella in food. Lett Appl Microbiol, 67, 79-88
  12. Farmer JJ (2005): Genus I. Vibrio pacini 1854. 494-546. In: GM Garrity (Ed), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer, New York
  13. García-Cayuela T, Tabasco R, Peláez C, et al (2009): Simultaneous detection and enumeration of viable lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in fermented milk by using propidium monoazide and real-time PCR. Int Dairy J, 19, 405-409
  14. Han F, Ge B (2010): Quantitative detection of Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters by real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification. In