SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2006 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

An isokinetic evaluation of the lateral supporting Ibn-i Sina brace’s stability: (A study of without brace and Jewett brace)

Lateral destekli İbn-i Sina korse stabilitesinin izokinetik olarak değerlendirilmesi: (Korsesiz ve Jewett korse ile karşılaştırılmalı bir çalışma)

Ali Kemal US
Onur POLAT
Pages
66–72
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Flexion angles of LSIS and Jewett braces were significantly lower than the situation without brace (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the stability of lateral supporting Ibn-i Sina vertebral brace by isokinetic assessment and to compare it with the situation without brace and Jewett brace.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Assessment was done on 10 healty volunteers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Flexion angles of LSIS and Jewett braces were significantly lower than the situation without brace (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the stability of lateral supporting Ibn-i Sina vertebral brace by isokinetic assessment and to compare it with the situation without brace and Jewett brace. Materials and Methods: The stability of two different three point principle braces, lateral supporting İbn-i Sina brace (LSIS) and Jewett brace were assessed isokinetically regarding sagittal plane flexion-extension angles and the work done at angular velocities and the results were compared with the situation without brace. Assessment was done on 10 healty volunteers. Results: After ANOVA analysis Tukey's for post hoc tests were done. Flexion angles of LSIS and Jewett braces were significantly lower than the situation without brace (p

Özet

Amaç: Lateral destekli İbn-i Sina (LDİS) korsenin stabilitesinin izokinetik olarak değerlendirilerek korsesiz ve Jewett korseli durumla karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Üç nokta prensibine dayalı iki farklı korse olan LDİS ve Jewett korselerinin stabilitesi, korsesiz duruma göre farkı, 10 sağlıklı katılımcıda sagittal planda fleksiyon-ekstansiyon yönünde hareket genişliği ve gövde kaslarının açısal hızlarda yaptığı iş ile izokinetik olarak değerlendirilerek karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: ANOVA analizi sonrasında yapılan Tukey'in çoklu karşılaştırma testinde, fleksiyon açıları, LDİS ve Jewett korseli olarak, korsesiz duruma göre anlamlı olarak azalmış (p

🔖

Cite This Article

US, A. K., POLAT, O. (2022). An isokinetic evaluation of the lateral supporting Ibn-i Sina brace’s stability: (A study of without brace and Jewett brace). Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 66–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/443933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Winter RB. Moe JH: Orthotic for spinal deformities. Clin. Orthop. 1973; 102: 72-91
  2. Michell LJ. Millis MB. The Spine: Postgraduate textbook of Clin. Orthop. 1983;49-95
  3. Asher MA, Whitney WH: Orthotic for spinal deformity. Orthotic Electra JB. Redford third edition Baltimore, W. Wilkins,1986; 153-157
  4. Lonstein JE: Orthotic treatment of the spinal deformities. Atlas of Orthotic American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons second edition. 1985; 371-385
  5. Newton M. Waddell G: Trunk strength testing with Iso-machines part 1: Review of a decade of scientific evidence: Spine 1993; 18:801
  6. Kahanovitz N. Levine DB. Lardone J: The part time Milwauke brace treatment of juvenile idiopatic scoliosis: long term follow up. Clin. Orthop. 1982; 167:145-49
  7. Mellencamp DD. Bount WP. Anderson AJ: Milwaukee brace treatment of idiopatic scoliosis: late results: Clin Orthop. 1984; 126:47-52
  8. Brown JC. Swank SM. Matta L. Et al: Late spinal deformity in quadriplegic children and adolescents: J. Pediatr Orthop. 1984; 4:436-41
  9. Winter RB. Moe JH. Macbwen D. et al: The Milwaukee brace and the nonoperative treatment of congenital scoliosis: Spine 1976; 1:85-92
  10. Gutowski WT. Renshaw TS: Orthotic results in adolescent kyphosis: Spine 1988; 13: 485-89
  11. Hensinger RN. Lang JR. MaxEwen GD: Surgical management of spondylolysthesis in children and adolescent. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1989; 71:15-22
  12. Nicolll EA: Fractures of the dorsolumbar spine J. Bone Joint Surg. 1969; 31:376-81
  13. Denis McAfee PC. Yuan HA. Fredericson BE. Lubicky JP: The value of computed tomography thoracolumber fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1983; 64:461-66
  14. Chow GH, Nelson BJ, Gebhard JS et al: Functional outcome of toracolumbar burst fractures managed with hiperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization. Spine 1996; 21:1270-5 15. Krompinger WJ. Fredericson BE. Mino DE. Yuan HA: Conservative management of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1996; 17:161-68
  15. James KS. Wevger KH. Schlegal JD. Dunn HK: Biomechanical evoluation of the stability of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Scoliosis Research Society 1993; 23
  16. Gregory HC. Bradley JN. James SG. John LB. Courtney WB. David HD: Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fracture managed with hiperextantion casting or bracing and early mobilization. Spine 1996; 21:18, 2170-2175
  17. White AA. Panjabi MM: clinical biomechanics of the spine. Pheledelphia JB. Lippincott 1990; 34; 475-509.