SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2016 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Different Stapler Insertion Technique on Anal Function in Patients Who Undergoing Anterior Resection With Stapled Anastomosis

Anterior Rezeksiyonlarda Anastomoz İçin Kullan lan Staplerin ÇeLitli Uygulama Şekillerinin Postoperatif Anal Fonksiyonlar

Sedef KURAN
Mehmet Ayhan KUZU
Ayhan Bülent ERKEK
Gökçe AYLAZ
Erkinbek ORAZOKUNOV
Attila TÖRÜNER
Can ATEL
Mustafa BERKELO?LU
Semih BASKAN
Pages
53–59
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The smaller size and appropriate dilator could be used for best clinical outcome in which wider patients were obtained as similarly this randomized, prospective study

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conclusion: Anorectal manometric parameters were preserved better in the dilator group (Group 2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Better outcome in the Group 2 was probably dealt with dilator which reflects to force equally, balanced and standardized on the anal canal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The smaller size and appropriate dilator could be used for best clinical outcome in which wider patients were obtained as similarly this randomized, prospective study
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Conclusion: Anorectal manometric parameters were preserved better in the dilator group (Group 2). Better outcome in the Group 2 was probably dealt with dilator which reflects to force equally, balanced and standardized on the anal canal. The smaller size and appropriate dilator could be used for best clinical outcome in which wider patients were obtained as similarly this randomized, prospective study

Özet

Sonuç: Dilatör kullan lan grupta (Grup 2) anorektal parametrelerin nispeten daha iyi korunmuL olmas n n muhtemel nedeni sabit bir dilatörün anal kanala yerleLtirilmesi ile tüm anal kanala eLit oranda kuvvetin, daha standart bir yöntemle uygulanm L olmas olarak düLünülmüLtür. Dairesel stapler çap na uygun ve daha küçük çaptaki dilatörler kullan larak geniL hasta serileriyle oluLturulan, benzer Lekilde düzenlenmiL randomize, prospektif, klinik çal Lmalarla daha iyi sonuçlar elde edilebilece?i düLü- nülmüLtür

🔖

Cite This Article

KURAN, S., KUZU, M. A., ERKEK, A. B., AYLAZ, G., ORAZOKUNOV, E., TÖRÜNER, A., ATEL, C., BERKELO?LU, M., BASKAN, S. (2022). Effect of Different Stapler Insertion Technique on Anal Function in Patients Who Undergoing Anterior Resection With Stapled Anastomosis. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1, 53–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/443742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Slesser A, et al. Survival after resection of colorectal cancer based on anatomical segment of involvement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4161-4168
  2. Ho Y-H, Low D, Goh H-S. Bowel function survey after segmental colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:307-310
  3. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RDH, et al. The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg. 1998;133:894-898
  4. Shrikhande SV, Saoji RR, Barreto SG, et al. Outcomes of resection for rectal cancer in India: The impact of the double stapling technique. World J of Surg Oncology 2007,5:35
  5. Luke M, Kirkegaard P, Lendorf A, et al. Pelvic Recurrence Rate After Abdominoperineal Resection and Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Before and After Introduction of the Stapling Technique. World J. Surg. 1983;7:616-619
  6. Winter DC, Murphy A, Kell MR, et al. Perioperative Topical Nitrate and Sphincter Function in Patients Undergoing Transanal Stapled Anastomosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:697-703
  7. Ho YH, Tan M, Leong A, et al. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:89-95
  8. Nakahara S, Itoh H, Mibu R, et al. Clinical and Manometric Evaluation of Anorectal Function Following Low Anterior Resection with Low Anastornotic Line Using an EEA Stapler for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:762-766
  9. Jiang JK, Lin JK. Anorectal dysfunction following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: A comparison between handsewn and stapled anastomosis. Colorectal Disease 1999;1:73-79
  10. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PWR, et al. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:888-891
  11. Fantina AC, Hetzerb FH, Christa AD, et al. Influence of stapler haemorrhoidectomy on anorectal function and on patients' acceptance. Swiss Med Weekly 2002;132:38-42
  12. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, et al. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J of Surg 2001;88:1449-1455
  13. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, et al. Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 2001;88:1487-1491
  14. Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:164-168
  15. Willi