Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Radiopacity of different types tooth colored restorative materials

Farklı yapıda diş renginde restoratif materyallerin radyoopasitelerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
123–130
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the thickness of the specimens had strong influence on radyodensities of tested materials (p Vitremer = Degufill Mineral =Glacier > Diamond Carve.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the different thickness and different shades on the radiopacity of different types of tooth colored restorative materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The radiopacities of one glass polyphosphonate (Diamond Carve), one resin modified glass ionomer (Vitremer), two poliasit modified composite resin (F 2000 and Dyract AP), four posterior composite resin restorative (Valux Plus, Tetric Ceram, Glacier, Degufill Mineral) materials were studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the thickness of the specimens had strong influence on radyodensities of tested materials (p Vitremer = Degufill Mineral =Glacier > Diamond Carve.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the different thickness and different shades on the radiopacity of different types of tooth colored restorative materials. The radiopacities of one glass polyphosphonate (Diamond Carve), one resin modified glass ionomer (Vitremer), two poliasit modified composite resin (F 2000 and Dyract AP), four posterior composite resin restorative (Valux Plus, Tetric Ceram, Glacier, Degufill Mineral) materials were studied. On radiograph, the optical densities of 1 and 2 mm standardized specimens as well as enamel and dentin specimens were determined and radiopacity values of the materials were expressed in milimeter equivalent aluminum. All tested materials showed that radiopacity values were not dependent on shades of the materials (p>0.05). However, the thickness of the specimens had strong influence on radyodensities of tested materials (p Vitremer = Degufill Mineral =Glacier > Diamond Carve.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı kalınlıkta ve farklı renklerde hazırlanan, değişik yapıda diş renginde restoratif materyallerin radyoopasitelerinin belirlenmesidir. Bir cam polifosfonat (Diamond Carve), bir rezin modifiye cam iyonomer (Vitremer), iki poliasit modifiye kompozit rezin (F2000 ve Dyract AP), dört kompozit rezin restoratif (Valux Plus, Tetric Ceram, Glacier, Degufill Mineral) materyal çalışıldı, 1 ve 2 mm kalınlığında hazırlanan standardize test örnekleri ile beraber, mine ve dentin örneklerinden elde edilen radyografideki optik yoğunluklar eşdeğer alüminyum değerleri ile belirtildi. Test edilen tüm materyallerin radyoopasite sonuçları renk değişkenine bağlı olarak istatistiksel farklılık göstermedi (p>0.05). Ancak, test örnek kalınlıklarının radyodensite ölçümünde kuvvetli etkisi olduğu saptandı (p Valux Plus> Vitremer = Degufill Mineral = Glacier > Diamond Carve.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜÇTAŞLI, M. B., ÖZTAŞ, B. (2022). Radiopacity of different types tooth colored restorative materials. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 123–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/442350