Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

WHY IS A MODERATE CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH NECESSARY TO ANALYSE EUROPEANIZATION OF FOREIGN, SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICIES?

Dış Politika, Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikalarının Avrupalılaşmasını İncelemek İçin Neden Ilımlı Bir Konstrüktüvist Yaklaşım Gereklidir?

Pages
161–187
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the intergovernmental and consensual nature of the foreign, security and defence policy-making within the EU do not lead to adaptation to rules, regulations and directives as tangible as the economic aspects of integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Europeanization refers to the impact of the European Union polity and policymaking on the national level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article argues that a moderate (modernist) constructivist approach is necessary to analyse Europeanization of foreign, security and defence policies of EU member states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the intergovernmental and consensual nature of the foreign, security and defence policy-making within the EU do not lead to adaptation to rules, regulations and directives as tangible as the economic aspects of integration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Europeanization refers to the impact of the European Union polity and policymaking on the national level. This article argues that a moderate (modernist) constructivist approach is necessary to analyse Europeanization of foreign, security and defence policies of EU member states. This is because this approach attributes constitutive and transformative roles to the social and ideational factors that emerge as a result of interaction in institutions. Furthermore, the intergovernmental and consensual nature of the foreign, security and defence policy-making within the EU do not lead to adaptation to rules, regulations and directives as tangible as the economic aspects of integration.

Özet

Avrupalılaşma kavram olarak Avrupa Birliği siyasetinin ve siyaset üretme sürecinin ulusal düzeydeki etkisini ifade eder. Bu makale, AB üye ülkelerinin dış politika, güvenlik ve savunma politikalarının avrupalılaşmasını incelemek için ılımlı (modernist) inşac? yaklaşımın gerekli olduğunu savunmaktadır. Sebebi, bu yaklaşımın kurumlar içerisindeki etkileşim sonucunda ortaya çıkan sosyal ve fikri faktörlere yapıcı ve dönüştürücü roller atfetmesidir. Üstelik, AB'nin dış politika, güvenlik ve savunma politikalarını oluşturma süreci hükümetler arası ve tam uzlaşmaya dayalı doğası gereği, bütünleşmenin ekonomik yönlerini düzenleyen kurallar, yönetmelikler ve direktifler sonucunda olduğu kadar gözle görülür bir uyum sürecine yol açmamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUN, Z. (2022). WHY IS A MODERATE CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH NECESSARY TO ANALYSE EUROPEANIZATION OF FOREIGN, SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICIES?. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 161–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/440923

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adler, Emanuel "Seizing the Middle Ground, Constructivism in World Affairs", European Journal of International Relations, Volume 3, No 3, 1997, pp. 319-363.
  2. Adler, Emanuel "Constructivism and International Relations", Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, London, Sage, 2003, pp. 95-118.
  3. Aggestam, Lisbeth "Role Conceptions and the Politics of Identity in Foreign Policy", Arena Working Papers, 99/8, University of Oslo, 1999. Accessed on 20 May 2008. http,//WWW.arena.uio.no/publications/workingpapers1999/papers/Wp99_8.htm Bache, Ian "Europeanization, Governance Approach", European Union Studies Association (EUSA) 8th Biennial Conference, Nashville, USA, 27-29 March 2003. Accessed on 20 May 2008. http,//aei.pitt.edu/554/ Borzel, Tanja A. "Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging and Fence-Sitting, Member State Responses to Europeanization", Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 40, No 2, 2001, pp. 193-214.
  4. Bulmer, Simon and Claudio Radaelli, "The Europeanization of National Policy?" Queen's Papers on Europeanization 1, Queen's University Belfast, 2004. Accessed on 20 May 2008. http,//WWW.qub.ac.uk/schools/ SchoolofPoliticsInternationalStudiesandPhilosophy/FileStore/Europeanization Files/Filetoupload,38405,en.pdf Checkel, Jeffrey T. "The Constluctivist Turn in International Relations Theory: Review Working paper", World Politics, Volume 50, No 2, 1998, pp. 324- 348. Checkel, Jeffrey "Social Learning and European Identity Change", International Organization, Volume 55, No 3, 2000, pp. 553-588.
  5. Christiansen, Thomas Knud Erik Jorgensen and Antje Wiener, "The Social Construction of Europe", Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 6, No 4, 1999, pp. 528--544. Croft, Stuart "The EU, NATO and Europeanization: The Return of Architectural Debate", European Security, Volume 9, No 3, Autumn 2000, pp. 1-20.
  6. Dover, Robert Europeanization of British Defence Policy, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007.
  7. Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt, "Rationalism V. Constructivism", Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, London, Sage, 2003, pp. 52-72.
  8. Featherstone, Kevin "Introduction, In the Name of Europe", K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 3-26.
  9. Fierke, Karin M. and Antje Wiener, "Constlucting Institutional Interests, EU and NATO Enlargement", Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 6, No 4, 1999, pp. 721-742. Gover