Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Avrupa Birliği'nin güvenlik ve savunma politikasında avrupalılaşmanın dinamikleri

Dynamics behind the europeanization in crisis management under the EU's security and defencepolicy

Pages
95–114
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Norms and interests influential at other institutional contexts determine the scope conditions of Europeanization

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article argues that a regulative norm to act in unity and make the Security and Defence Policy work through crisis management missions is operative within the European Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:EU crisis management missions analysed here demonstrate that this normative concern has influenced the national preferences of even the larger member states, Britain and France.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Norms and interests influential at other institutional contexts determine the scope conditions of Europeanization
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article argues that a regulative norm to act in unity and make the Security and Defence Policy work through crisis management missions is operative within the European Union. EU crisis management missions analysed here demonstrate that this normative concern has influenced the national preferences of even the larger member states, Britain and France. However, Europeanization of foreign and security policies of these two member states appears to take place easier if it does not collide with pre-existing norms and interests at the domestic and international levels. Norms and interests influential at other institutional contexts determine the scope conditions of Europeanization

Özet

Bu makale birlikte hareket etme ve Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikasını kriz yönetimi operasyonları yoluyla çalıştırmaktan ibaret bir düzenleyici normun Avrupa Birliği içerisinde işlerlik kazandığını iddia etmektedir. Burada incelenen AB kriz yönetimi operasyonları bu normatifendişenin İngiltere ve Fransa gibi büyük üye devletlerin ulusal tercihlerini bile etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, bu iki üye devletin dış ve güvenlik politikalarının Avrupalılaşmasının, eğer bu, iç ve dış düzeylerde daha önceden varolan normlar ve çıkarlarla çatışmazsa daha kolay meydana geldiği görülmektedir. Başka kurumsal ortamlardaki normlar ve çıkarlar Avrupalılaşmanın kapsama şartlarını belirlemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUN, Z. (2017). Avrupa Birliği'nin güvenlik ve savunma politikasında avrupalılaşmanın dinamikleri. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 95–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/291923

References (5)

  1. ASTILL, J. (2003), "French Soldiers Begin Patrols in War-Torn Congo," The Guardian, 7 June, 16. BAYART, J-F. (2004), "Commentary: Towards A New Start for Africa and Europe," African Affairs 103, 412, 453-458.
  2. BLACK, I. (2003), "Europe Tests Its Military Wings", The Guardian, 13 June, 20. BÖRZEL, T. A. (2001) "Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging and Fence-Sitting, Member State Responses to Europeanization", Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 2, 193-214.
  3. CASTLE, S. (2003) "Military Mission to Africa is First for the EU," The Independent, 5 June, 14. CHARILLON, F. (2005), "The EU as a Security Regime", European Foreign Affairs Review 10, 517- 533. Council Decision 2003/432/CFSP of 12 June 2003 on the launching of the EU military operation in the DRC (2003), Official Journal of the European Communities, L147/42, 14 June. Council Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP of 9 September 2005 on the EU Monitoring Mission in Aceh (Indonesia) (Aceh Monitoring Mission- AMM) (2005), Official Journal of the European Union, EN, L 234/13, 10 September. DE FLERS, N. A. (2012), EU Foreign Policy and the Europeanization of Neutral States. Comparing Irish and Austrian foreign policy, Oxon and New York, Routledge. DOVER, R. (2007), Europeanization of British Defence Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate. ER, L. (2004), "Japan's Peace-building Diplomacy in Aceh," Asian Ethnicity 5, 3, October, 353-366.
  4. ER, L. (2006), "Japan's Human Security Role in Southeast Asia", Contemporary Southeast Asia 28, 1, 141-159. EU Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine Pamphlet (2008), Odesa: EUBAM, January. European Commission (2002), Information Note to the Council on Rapid Reaction Mechanism - Aceh, Indonesia/ Support to the Cessation of Hostilities Framework Agreement, D(2002) D/129335, Brussels, 9 December. European Commission (2005), Information Note to The Council on Support to the Aceh Peace Process Negotiations under the EC Rapid Reaction Mechanism, RELEX/A4 REG PA (05) D/508248, Brussels, 15 April. European External Action Service (2016) Military and Civilian Missions and Operations, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/430/military-and-civilian- missions-and-operations_en. Retrieved on 22 January 2016.
  5. European Security Strategy (2003), "A Secure Europe in a Better World," Brussels, 12 December. European Union Neighbourhood Policy (2006), European Union-Georgia Action Plan, 14 November. EU-led Military Operation in the DRC (2003), "Operation Artemis" Fact Sheet, July. EUSR Border Supp