Journals / Anatolian Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Phenolic screening and biological activities of Chenopodium botrys L. extracts

Chenopodium botrys L. ekstraktlarının fenolik taraması ve biyolojik aktiviteleri

Pages
78–83
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that both extracts have important properties that should be evaluated, and especially the ethanolic extract is more effective than the methanolic extract in all aspects (TPC, antioxidant capacity, and cytotoxicity).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The genus Chenopodium is a genus that includes over 200 species and contains annual or perennial herbaceous flowering plant species scattered almost worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 4 phenolic components in the extracts were determined with the HPLC technique and to determine the antioxidant activity of the plant extracts TPC (total phenolic content), RPA (reducing power activity), and DPPH (2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) methods were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that both extracts have important properties that should be evaluated, and especially the ethanolic extract is more effective than the methanolic extract in all aspects (TPC, antioxidant capacity, and cytotoxicity).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The genus Chenopodium is a genus that includes over 200 species and contains annual or perennial herbaceous flowering plant species scattered almost worldwide. While species belonging to the Chenopodium genus are used to treat various diseases, modern pharmaceutical research has revealed their strong anticancer, antifungal and antibacterial potential. In this study, some biological effects of Chenopodium botrys (methanol and ethanol) extracts were evaluated by helping some analytical approaches. The antioxidant and cytotoxic potentials of the extracts were revealed. In this study, 4 phenolic components in the extracts were determined with the HPLC technique and to determine the antioxidant activity of the plant extracts TPC (total phenolic content), RPA (reducing power activity), and DPPH (2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) methods were used. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was used to determine the cytotoxic effect of the extracts on the HL60 cell line. The results showed that both extracts have important properties that should be evaluated, and especially the ethanolic extract is more effective than the methanolic extract in all aspects (TPC, antioxidant capacity, and cytotoxicity). As a conclusion, it is clear that this plant needs to be investigated further for the isolation and characterization of new and effective phytochemicals. We hope that this study could be a precursor for future studies.

Özet

Chenopodium cinsi, 200'den fazla türe sahip ve hemen hemen tüm Dünya’da yayılış gösteren tek yıllık veya çok yıllık otsu çiçekli bitki türlerini içeren bir cinstir. Chenopodium cinsine ait türler çeşitli hastalıkların tedavisinde kullanılırken, modern farmasötik araştırmalar güçlü antikanser, antifungal ve antibakteriyel potansiyellerini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu çalışmada, Chenopodium botrys (metanol ve etanol) ekstraktlarının bazı biyolojik etkileri (antioksidan ve sitotoksik potansiyelleri), çeşitli analitik yaklaşımlar yardımıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada ekstraktlarda bulunan 4 fenolik bileşenin tespiti HPLC tekniği ile yapılmış, bitkinin antioksidan aktivitesini belirlemek için TPC, RPA ve DPPH yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Ekstraktların HL60 hücre hattı üzerindeki sitotoksik etkisini belirlemek için ise MTT testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, her iki ekstraktın da değerlendirilmesi gereken önemli özelliklere sahip olduğunu ve özellikle etanolik ekstraktın her yönden (TPC, antioksidan kapasite ve sitotoksisite) metanolik ekstrakttan daha etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, yeni ve etkili fitokimyasalların izolasyonu ve karakterizasyonu için bu bitkinin daha fazla araştırılması gerektiği açıktır. Bu çalışmanın gelecekteki çalışmalar için bir öncü olabileceğini umuyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, E. N. Ş., UYSAL, T. (2022). Phenolic screening and biological activities of Chenopodium botrys L. extracts. Anatolian Journal of Botany, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/438965

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acıbuca V, Budak DB (2018). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de tıbbi ve aromatik bitkilerin yeri ve önemi. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 33(1): 37-44.
  2. Ahmed D, Khan MM, Saeed R (2015). Comparative analysis of phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant and antibacterial potential of methanolic, hexanic and aqueous extracts from Adiantum caudatum leaves. Antioxidants 4(2): 394-409.
  3. Al-Hazzani AA, Alshatwi AA (2011). Catechin hydrate inhibits proliferation and mediates apoptosis of SiHa human cervical cancer cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology 49(12): 3281-3286.
  4. Alshatwi AA (2010). Catechin hydrate suppresses MCF-7 proliferation through TP53/Caspase-mediated apoptosis. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 29(1): 1-9.
  5. Andov LA, Karapandzova M, Jovanova B, Stefkov G, Karanfilova IC, Panovska TK, Kulevanova S (2015). Antioxidative potential of Chenopodium botrys L. (Amaranthaceae). Macedonian Pharmaceutical Bulletin 61(2): 3-10.
  6. Baldi A, Choudhary NK (2013). In vitro antioxidant and hepatoprotective potential of Chenopodium album extract. International Journal of Green Pharmacy 7(1): 50–56.
  7. Bandaranayake WM (2006). Modern Phytomedicine. Turning Medicinal Plants into Drugs. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH. Bano A, Ahmad M, Ben Hadda T, Saboor A, Sultana S, Zafar M, Khan MP, Arshad M, Ashraf MA (2014). Quantitative ethnomedicinal study of plants used in the Skardu valley at high altitude of Karakoram-Himalayan range. Pakistan Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10(1): 43. Bhargava A, Shukla S, Kumar R, Ohri D (2009). Metroglyph analysis of morphological variation in Chenopodium spp. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(1): 117-120.
  8. Bodeker C, Bodeker G, Ong CK, Grundy CK, Burford G, Shein K (2005).
  9. WHO Global Atlas of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Bozyel ME, Bozyel EM, Canlı K, Altuner EM (2019). Anticancer Uses of Medicinal Plants in Turkish Traditional Medicine. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 22 (Suppl. 2): 465-484.
  10. Chu YH, Chang CL, Hsu HF (2000). Flavonoid content of several vegetables and their antioxidant activity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80(5): 561-566.
  11. Efferth T, Olbrich A, Sauerbrey A, Ross DD, Gebhart E, Neugebauer M (2002). Activity of ascaridol from the anthelmintic herb Chenopodium anthelminticum L. against sensitive and multidrug-resistant tumor cells. Anticancer Research 22(6C): 4221- 4224. Ekor M (2014). The growing use