SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Tıp Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Dializ hastalarının psikiyatrik belirti düzeyleri ve stresle başa çıkma becerileri

Psychiatric symptom levels and the way of coping with the stress in dialysis patients

Sıtkı KARACA
Hakan HERKEN
Ekrem DOĞAN
Süleyman TÜRK
Mehdi YEKSAN
Süleyman ALICI
Rüstem AŞKIN
Pages
206–211
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, CAPD patients experience higher quality of life than HD patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Coping mechanisms help individuals to defend against chronic stress.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-two HD and 10 CAPD patients were assessed by using Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I and II) and The Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, CAPD patients experience higher quality of life than HD patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Coping mechanisms help individuals to defend against chronic stress. On this way an individual can resist psychological stress. Coping mechanisms are interrelated with the cultural status of the population. In this study, the aim was to search the way of coping with psychological problems in dialysis patients. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients were included in the study. Thirty-two HD and 10 CAPD patients were assessed by using Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I and II) and The Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ). In HD patients, all WCQ's subscales were higher than in the CAPD patients. It is plausible to say that, HD patients use more coping ways due to their more dependent life style than the CAPD patients. Therefore, CAPD patients experience higher quality of life than HD patients.

Özet

Başa çıkma düzenekleri birey kronik strese karşı koymasında kullanılır. Birey bu yolla psikolojik strese karşı koyabilir. Başa çıkma düzenekleri toplumun kültürel düzeyi ile ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmada dializ hastalarının psikolojik sorunları ile nasıl başa çıktıklarını belirlemeyi amaçladık. Bu çalışma sürekli periton dializi alan ve hemodiyalize devam eden hastalar üzerinde yapıldı. Çalışmaya 32 hemodiyaliz ve 10 periton dializi hastası alındı. Hastalara Ruhsal Belirti Tarama Listesi (RBTL), Hamilton Depresyon Ölçeği (Ham-D), Durumluluk ve Süreklilik Kaygı Envanteri (DSKE) ve Stresle Başa çıkma Ölçeği (SBÖ) uygulandı. Hemodiyaliz hastalarında tüm stresle başa çıkma alt ölçekleri periton diyalizli hastalardan yüksekti. Hemodializli hastalar ruhsal durumlarının bozulması nedeniyle periton diyalizli hastalara göre daha fazla başa çıkma yollarına başvurmaktadırlar. Periton diyalizli hastaların hayat kalitelerinin hemodiyalizi! hastalara kıyasla daha yüksek olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, S., HERKEN, H., DOĞAN, E., TÜRK, S., YEKSAN, M., ALICI, S., AŞKIN, R. (2022). Dializ hastalarının psikiyatrik belirti düzeyleri ve stresle başa çıkma becerileri. Anadolu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 206–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/438187

References (16)

  1. Alfred E. Mamelok MD. Psychiatry and surgery. Kaplan IH, Sadock BJ (eds), Williams & Wilkins, 5 cd. Baltimore. 1989, ppl317-1331
  2. Brownbridge G. Fielding DM. Psychosocial adjustment to end stage renal failure: Comparing hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and transplantation. Ped Nephrology 1991;5:612-16
  3. Derogatis LR, Clearly PA. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90R: a study in construct validition. J Clin Psych 1977;33:981-989
  4. Felton BJ, Revenson TA. Coping with Chronic illness. A study of illness controllability and the influence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment. J Cons Clin Psychol 1984;52:343-353
  5. Gokal R. Quality of Life. In: The Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis. Ed. R Gokal, KD Nolph. KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, Ch.23,1994, pp.679-698
  6. Hamilton, M. A rating Scale for depression. J.Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960,23:56-62 7. Johnson JP, McCauley CR, Copley JB. The Quality of Life hemodilaysis and transplant patients. Kidney INT 1982;22:286-91
  7. Kaya N,Herken H, Yeksan M,ve ark. Psychiatric Symptoms and Body-Self Image in Continue Ambulatory Dialysis and Hemodialysis patients. The journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 1998;18 (Suppl 2)Abstract of the VIII Congress ofthe lSPD
  8. Leake R, Friend R, Wadhwa N. Improving adjustment to chronic illness through strategic self-presentation: an experimental study on a renal dialysis unitHealth Psychol 1999 18:54-62
  9. Lev EL, Owen SV. A prospective study of adjustment to hemodialysis. ANNA J 1998 Oct;25:495-506
  10. Levinson JL, Glocheski S. Psychological factorsaffecting ESRD. Psychosomatic 1991:32:382-389
  11. Lindqvist R, Carlsson M, Sjoden PO. Coping strategies and quality of life among patients on hemodialysisand continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Scand J Caring Sci 1998:12:223-30
  12. Lindqvist R, Carlsson M, Sjoden PO. Coping strategies and health-related quality of life amongspouses of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis, and transplant patients. J Adv Nurs 2000;31:1398-408
  13. Lok P. Stressors, coping mechanism and quality of life among dialysis patients in Australia. J Adv Nurs 1996:23:873-81
  14. Mathers DF: Beyond survival. Dial Transplantation 1980; 9:657-661
  15. McNair DM, Lorr M, Dropplenam LF. Manualfor the Profile of mood state. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego 1981;282
  16. Nissenson AR, Maida CA, Katz AH et al. Psychological ad