First three of estimated five different canonical correlation coefficients (CCC) between the pairs of canonical variables were found significant (0.955, 0.704, 0.482, P
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, canonical correlation analysis was applied to estimate the relationship between six different morphologic traits (X set – live weight, chest girth, chest depth, body length, leg circumference and height at withers) measured at Pre-Slaughtering period and five different carcass traits (Y set – the weights of hot carcass, head, skin, leg and arm) measured from 57 hoggets of Karayaka, at Research and Application Farm of Agriculture Faculty, at Ondokuz Mayis University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, canonical correlation analysis was applied to estimate the relationship between six different morphologic traits (X set – live weight, chest girth, chest depth, body length, leg circumference and height at withers) measured at Pre-Slaughtering period and five different carcass traits (Y set – the weights of hot carcass, head, skin, leg and arm) measured from 57 hoggets of Karayaka, at Research and Application Farm of Agriculture Faculty, at Ondokuz Mayis University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:First three of estimated five different canonical correlation coefficients (CCC) between the pairs of canonical variables were found significant (0.955, 0.704, 0.482, P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, canonical correlation analysis was applied to estimate the relationship between six different morphologic traits (X set – live weight, chest girth, chest depth, body length, leg circumference and height at withers) measured at Pre-Slaughtering period and five different carcass traits (Y set – the weights of hot carcass, head, skin, leg and arm) measured from 57 hoggets of Karayaka, at Research and Application Farm of Agriculture Faculty, at Ondokuz Mayis University. First three of estimated five different canonical correlation coefficients (CCC) between the pairs of canonical variables were found significant (0.955, 0.704, 0.482, P
Özet
Bu çalışmada, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Araştırma ve Uygulama Çiftliği’nde yetiştirilen 57 baş Karayaka erkek tokludan kesim öncesi alınmış 6 farklı morfolojik özellik (X kümesi – canlı ağırlık, göğüs çevresi, göğüs derinliği, vücut uzunluğu, but çevresi ve cidago yüksekliği) ile 5 farklı karkas özelliği (Y kümesi – sıcak karkas, baş, deri, but ve kol ağırlıkları) arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak amacıyla kanonik korelasyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen 5 farklı kanonik değişen çiftleri arasında hesaplanan kanonik korelasyon katsayılarından (KKK) ilk üçü (0.955, 0.704, 0.482) önemli bulunmuştur (P
🔖
Cite This Article
OLFAZ, M., ERENER, G., ÇANKAYA, S., ALTOP, A. (2022). Canonical correlation analysis for estimation of relationships between some traits measured at pre- and- post slaughtering periods in Karayaka hoggets. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/438096
Akbaş Y. and Takma Ç., 2005. Canonical Correlation Analysis for Studying the Relationship between Egg Production Traits and Body Weight, Egg Weight and Age at Sexual Maturity in Layers. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 163–168.
Atasoy, F., Ünal N., Akçapınar, H., Mundan, D., 2003. Karayaka ve Bafra (Sakız x Karayaka G1) Koyunlarında Bazı Verim Özellikleri. Tr. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 27: 259-264.
Aydoğan, M., Gül, I., 1992. Sakız ve Karayaka Irkları Arasındaki Melezlemelerle Yeni Bir Koyun Tipinin Geliştirilme İmkanları. Doğa-Tr. J. of Vet. Anim. Sci., 16: 393-402.
Bilgin O.C., Emsen E. and Davis M.E., 2003. An Application of Canonical Correlation Analysis to Relationships between the Head and Scrotum Measurements in Awassi Fat Tailed Lambs. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 2: 343-349.
Çankaya, S. and G.T. Kayaalp. 2007. Estimation of Relationship between Live Weights and Some Body Measurements in German Farm x Hair Crossbred by Canonical Correlation Analysis. J. Anim. Prod., 48:27-32.
Cankaya, S., Yazgan, E., Kayaalp, G.T., Gocmez, Z. and Serbester, U., 2008. Estimation of Relationship between Some Body Measurements of Holstein Friesian Calves at the Birth and Six-Month Periods by Canonical Correlation Analysis. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 953-958.
Daskiran, I., Keskin, S., Kizilkaya, K. and Bingol, M., 2007. Canonical Correlation for Some Body Traits of Angora Goats, Indian Vet. J., 84: 261-263.
Fourie P.J., Neser F.W.C., Oliver J.J. and van der Westhuizen C., 2002. Relationship Between Production Performance, Visual Appraisal and Body Measurements of Young Dorper Rams. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 256-262.
Gao, D.D. and Huang, R.B., 2000. Some Results on Canonical Correlation and Their Applications to a Linear Model. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 321:47-59p. Gunderson B.K. and Muirhead R.J., 1997. On Estimating the Dimensionality in Canonical Correlation Analysis. J. Multivariate Anal., 62: 121-136.
Güney, O., Özcan, L., Pekel, E., Biçer, O., Torun, O., 1990. Çağdaş Düzeydeki Sakız x İvesi F1 ve Saf İvesi Koyunların Çukurova Koşullarındaki Performansları. Ç.Ü. Zir. Fak. Der., 5: 91-100.
Gürbüz, F., 1989. Değişken Takımları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Kanonik Korelasyon Yöntemi ile Araştırılması. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayın No:1162, Ankara. Johnson R.A and Wicherm D.W., 2002. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (5th ed.) Prentice Hill. 767p. Keskin, S., Daşkıran, İ., Kor, A. ve Arslan, S., 2004. Ankara Keçisi Oğlaklarında Altıncı ve Onikinci Ay Morfolojik Özellikleri Arasındak