Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of qualitative and quantitative analysis methods in evaluating spray application performance

İlaç uygulama performansının değerlendirilmesinde kalitatif ve kantitatif analiz yöntemlerinin incelenmesi

Pages
133–140
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the factors affecting the recovery of color dyes, degradation of dye materials and image processing quality in qualitative and quantitative methods were reviewed regarding up to date literatures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Various qualitative and quantitative methods were developed for the determination of spray application performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These methods are desired to be practical, easy and economic because of analyzing lots of samples to decrease error variance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the factors affecting the recovery of color dyes, degradation of dye materials and image processing quality in qualitative and quantitative methods were reviewed regarding up to date literatures.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Various qualitative and quantitative methods were developed for the determination of spray application performance. These methods are desired to be practical, easy and economic because of analyzing lots of samples to decrease error variance. The measurements in quantitative methods were made with image processing software. Water-sensitive, oilsensitive and kromekote cards are used as sampling materials and their image processing quality is spoiled by changing color at the unsuitable conditions because of their sensitivity to humidity. Sampling materials such a filter paper, petri dishes and plant leaf are used in quantitative methods and food dye is mixed to spray liquid instead of pesticide in the spray application. At this method, the mixing of dye completely washed from surface without degradation, depends on the properties of the used sampling material. On the other hand, dye deposited on the surface after the application may be degraded due to its explosion to solar radiation at the open atmosphere and this can change the concentration of solution. In this study, the factors affecting the recovery of color dyes, degradation of dye materials and image processing quality in qualitative and quantitative methods were reviewed regarding up to date literatures.

Özet

İlaçlama ünitelerinin uygulama performanslarını belirlemek için çeşitli kalitatif ve kantitatif yöntemler geliştirilmiştir. Uygulamalarda hata varyansını azaltmak için çok sayıda örneğin analizi yapıldığından, ölçüm yöntemlerinin pratik, kolay ve ekonomik olması arzu edilir. Kalitatif yöntemlerde ölçümler, görüntü işleme programlarıyla yapılmaktadır. Bu yöntemde örnekleme materyali olarak suya duyarlı, yağa duyarlı kartlar ve kromekote kartları kullanılmakta ve neme duyarlı olduklarından uygun olmayan şartlarda renk değiştirerek görüntü işleme kaliteleri bozulmaktadır. Kantitatif yöntemlerde ise filtre kağıdı, petri kabı ve bitki yaprağı gibi örnekleme materyalleri kullanılmakta ve uygulamalarda püskürtme sıvısına pestisit yerine gıda boyası karıştırılmaktadır. Bu yöntemde yüzeyden yıkanan maddenin bozulmadan tamamen çözücüye karışması, kullanılan örnekleme materyalinin özelliğine bağlıdır. Ayrıca uygulamadan sonra yüzeyde tutunan madde, açık havada solar radyasyona maruz kaldığından bozulabilmekte ve çözeltinin konsantrasyonu değişebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada kalitatif ve kantitatif analiz yöntemlerinde görüntü işleme kalitesini, renk maddelerinin bozulmasını ve renk maddelerinin geri kazanımını etkileyen faktörler literatür bilgileri ısığında derlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYINCI, B., BASTABAN, S. (2022). Investigation of qualitative and quantitative analysis methods in evaluating spray application performance. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 133–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/438086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ade, G., Rondelli, V., 2007. Performance of an air-assisted boom sprayer in the control of Colorado beetle infestation in potato crops. Biosystems Engineering, 97: 181-187.
  2. Ade, G., Molari, G., Rondelli, V., 2007. Recycling tunnel sprayer for pesticide dose adjustment to the environment. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(2): 409- 413. Almekinders H., Ozkan, H. E., Reichard, D. L., Carpenter, T. G., Brazee, R. D., 1993. Deposition efficiency of air-assisted, charged sprays in a wind tunnel. Transactions of the ASAE, 36(2): 321-325. Anonymous, 2002. Water sensitive paper for monitoring spray distributions. CH-4002. Basle, Switzerland: Syngenta Crop Protection AG. Baetens, K., Nuyttens D., Verboven, P., Schampheleire, M. De, Nicolai, B., Ramon, H., 2007. Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 56(2): 161-173.
  3. Balsari, P., Marucco, P., Tamagnone, M., 2007. A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk. Crop Protection, Crop Protection, 26(10): 1482-1489.
  4. Barber, J. A. S., Parkin, C. S., Chowdhury, A. B. M. N. U., 2003. Effect of application method on control of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) on spring barley. Crop Protection, 22: 949-957.
  5. Bayat, A., Bozdogan, N. Y., 2005. An air-assisted spinning disc nozzle and its performance on spray deposition and reduction of drift potential. Crop Protection, 24: 651-960.
  6. Bozdogan, N. Y., Bayat, A., 2005. Spray deposition and drift potential of an air-assisted atomizer (Turbofan® Sprayhead) in spraying cotton plants. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture & 27th International Conference of CIGR Section IV: The Efficient Use of Electricity Renewable Sources in Agriculture, Sep., İzmir, 27-29.
  7. Coates, W., Palumbo, J., 1997. Deposition, off-target movement, and efficacy of CaptureTM and ThiodanTM applied to cantaloupes using five sprayers. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 13 (2): 181-188.
  8. Coates, W., 1996. Spraying technologies for cotton: Deposition and Efficacy. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 12 (3): 287-296. Degré, A., Mostade, O., Huyghebaert, B., Tissot, S., Debouche, C., 2001. Comparison by image processing of target supports of spray droplets. Transactions of the ASAE, 44 (2): 217-222.
  9. Derksen, R. C., Gray, R. L., 1995. Deposition and air speed patterns of air-carrier apple orchard sprayers. Transactions of the ASAE, 38(1): 5-11.
  10. Derksen, R