Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Conditions when coronary angiography should not/is not necessarily be performed

Koroner anjiyografinin yapılmamasının uygun/gerekli olduğu durumlar

Pages
53–55
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

NİŞANCI, Y. (2022). Conditions when coronary angiography should not/is not necessarily be performed. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 53–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/437439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Pepine CJ, Allen HD, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1149-82
  2. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1756–824
  3. Dehmer GJ, Arani D, Noto T, et al. Lessons learned from the review of cardiac catheterization laboratories: a report from the Laboratory Survey Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 24–31
  4. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB et al. ACC/SCA&I expert consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 2170-214
  5. Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R, et al. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 24: 75–83
  6. Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW. Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization: the Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 30: 185–90
  7. Greenberger PA, Patterson R. Adverse reactions to radiocontrast media. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1988; 31: 239–48
  8. Barrett BJ, Carlisle EJ. Meta-analysis of the relative nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality iodinated contrast media. Radiology 1993; 188: 171–8
  9. Lawrence W, Matthai W, Hartmaier S. Comparative safety of high-osmolality and low-osmolality radiographic contrast agents: report of a multidisciplinary working group. Invest Radiol 1992; 27: 2–28
  10. Tepel M, Van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, et al. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 180–4.