Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Normotansif ve hipertansif bireylerde ambulatuvar nabız basıncı ve ikili ürün LOAD limitleri

LOAD limits for ambulatory pulse pressure and double product in normotensive and hypertensive subjects

Pages
322–326
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although mean (total, day and night mean) values of HT subjects were higher approximately by 20% than of NT subjects, LOAD values for ambulatory PP in HTs were 33%-415% higher than in NTs (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to to determine possible daytime (awake hours) and nighttime (sleeping hours) LOAD limits for ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) and double product (DP) in hypertensive (HT) subjects and secondly to assess whether there were significant differences in the LOAD values between hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Seventy-eight untreated essential HT (46 female, 32 male; mean age 51.9±1.4 years) and 115 NT (89 female, 26 male; mean age 40.8±1.1 years) subjects participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although mean (total, day and night mean) values of HT subjects were higher approximately by 20% than of NT subjects, LOAD values for ambulatory PP in HTs were 33%-415% higher than in NTs (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to to determine possible daytime (awake hours) and nighttime (sleeping hours) LOAD limits for ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) and double product (DP) in hypertensive (HT) subjects and secondly to assess whether there were significant differences in the LOAD values between hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) subjects. Methods: Seventy-eight untreated essential HT (46 female, 32 male; mean age 51.9±1.4 years) and 115 NT (89 female, 26 male; mean age 40.8±1.1 years) subjects participated in this study. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) devices were applied to these subjects for 48 hours. Different possible ambulatory PP LOAD limits between 40 and 55 mmHg with 5 mmHg increments and ambulatory DP LOAD limits between 6000 and 12000 mmHg.beats/min with 1000 mmHg.beats/min increments were used. Then according to these limits, LOAD values of NT and HT subjects have been assessed for daytime, nighttime and 48 hours. Results: There were significant differences between NT and HT subjects in all the values for both ambulatory PP and DP. Although mean (total, day and night mean) values of HT subjects were higher approximately by 20% than of NT subjects, LOAD values for ambulatory PP in HTs were 33%-415% higher than in NTs (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı hipertansif ve normotansif bireyler arasında ambulatuvar nabız basıncı (PP) ve ikili ürün (DP, kalp hızı x sistolik kan basıncı) parametrelerinin tanımlanan bir zaman biriminde belli limitlerin üzerindeki ölçüm oranı olarak bilinen LOAD değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Yetmiş sekiz yeni tanı konulmuş esansiyel hipertansiyon (HT) (46 kadın, 32 erkek; ortalama yaş: 51.9±1.4 yıl) ve 115 normotansif (NT) birey (48 kadın, 26 erkek; ortalama yaş: 40.8±1.1 yıl) çalışmaya alındı. Ambulatuvar kan basıncı monitörizasyonu (ABPM) 48 saat süreyle yapıldı. Kırk beş ile 55 mmHg arasında 5 mmHg aralıklı farklı muhtemel nabız basıncı LOAD limitleri ve 6000 ile 12000 mmHg.atım/dk. arasında 1000 mmHg.atım/dk. aralıklı ambulatuvar ikili ürün LOAD limitleri kullanıldı. Bu limitlere göre NT ve HT bireyler için LOAD değerleri gündüz, gece ve 48 saatlik zaman süreleri için ölçüldü. Bulgular: Normotansif ve HT bireyler arasında hem ambulatuvar PP; hem de DP yönünden anlamlı bir fark bulundu. Hipertansif olanlarda ortalama PP (toplam, gündüz ve gece için) değerleri NT bireylere göre %20 yüksek olmasına karşın, HT olanlarda ambulatuvar LOAD değerleri NT bireylere göre %33-415 daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖRTLEMEZ, H., HODOĞLUGİL, U., CEYHAN, M., ZENGİL, H., DURAKOĞLUGİL, D. B., CEMRİ, M. (2022). Normotansif ve hipertansif bireylerde ambulatuvar nabız basıncı ve ikili ürün LOAD limitleri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 322–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/437257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, Smulyan H, Richard JL, Ducimetieere P, et al. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension 1997; 30: 1410-5
  2. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Pede S, Porcellati C. Ambulatory pulse pressure: a potent predictor of total cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Hypertension 1998; 32: 983-8
  3. Mancia G, Giannattasio C, Failla M, Sega P, Parati G. Systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure: role of 24-h mean values and variability in the determination of organ damage. J Hypertens 1999; 17 (suppl 5): S55-S61
  4. Verdecchia P. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension 2000; 35: 844
  5. White WB. Heart rate and the rate-pressure product as determinants of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 50S-55S
  6. Azevedo J, Arroja I, Jacques A, Santos I, Amado P, Marques JC, et al. A double ambulatory product (blood pressure and heart rate), mild arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Rev Port Cardiol 1993; 12: 663-73 (Abs.)
  7. White WB. Relevance of the trough-to-peak ratio to the 24 h blood pressure LOAD. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9 (10Pt 2): 91S-6S
  8. White WB, Dey HM, Schulman P. Assessment of the daily blood pressure LOAD as a determinant of cardiac function in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 782-95
  9. Nobre F, Mion D. Is the area under blood pressure curve the best parameter to evaluate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data? Blood Pres Monitor 2005; 10: 263-70
  10. Zakopoulos NA, Toumanidis ST, Barlas GJ, Nanas SN, Lekakis JP, Stamatelopoulas SF, et al. A 'pressure-time index' for assessing the severity of essential hypertension. J Hypertension 1999; 17; 1387-93
  11. Staessen JA, Bieniaszewski L, O'Brien ET, Fagard R. What is a normal blood pressure on ambulatory monitoring ? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 241-5
  12. Khattar RS, Swales JD, Banfield A, Dore C, Senior R, Lahiri A. Prediction of coronary and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality by direct continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension. Circulation 1999; 100: 1071-6
  13. White WB, Schulman P, McCabe EJ, Dey HM. Average daily blood pressure, no office blood pressure, determines cardiac function in patients with hypertension. JAMA 1989; 261: 873-7
  14. Lantelme P, Milon H, Vernet M, Gayet C. Difference between office and ambulatory blood pressure on