Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the view of ethics and law

Hukuk ve etik açısından kardiyopulmoner resüssitasyon

Pages
374–378
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to discuss legal and cultural norms in our country, which is still under discussion all over the world, we tried to summarize our own opinions about the patient’s autonomy, principle of futility, termination of resuscitation, who should attempt resuscitation and relations with family members during resuscitation under current guidelines and literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In all medical and surgical interventions, the main principle is to inform the patient of possible complications, side and adverse effects of the intervention and patient’s acceptance with his/her own will.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it is impossible to obey this ethical norm in attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to discuss legal and cultural norms in our country, which is still under discussion all over the world, we tried to summarize our own opinions about the patient’s autonomy, principle of futility, termination of resuscitation, who should attempt resuscitation and relations with family members during resuscitation under current guidelines and literature.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In all medical and surgical interventions, the main principle is to inform the patient of possible complications, side and adverse effects of the intervention and patient’s acceptance with his/her own will. However, it is impossible to obey this ethical norm in attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation. May a legal problem arise when the goals of health care providers and the patient and family members could not be overlapped? Have expected survey and quality of life influence on resuscitative efforts? In order to discuss legal and cultural norms in our country, which is still under discussion all over the world, we tried to summarize our own opinions about the patient’s autonomy, principle of futility, termination of resuscitation, who should attempt resuscitation and relations with family members during resuscitation under current guidelines and literature.

Özet

Tıp hizmeti sunulurken temel prensip hastanın olası komplikasyonlar, ters ve yan etkiler konusunda bilgilendirilmesi ve hastanın tıbbi girişimi kendi rızası ile kabul etmesidir. Ancak kardiyopulmoner resüssitasyonda bu etik normlara uymak mümkün değildir. Sağlık çalışanlarıyla hasta ve hasta yakınlarının beklentilerinin, hedeflerinin örtüşmediği durumlarda hukuki problem çıkabilir mi? Beklenen yaşam süresi ve kalitesi resüsitatif çabayı etkilemeli midir? Halen tüm dünyada tartışılmakta olan hukuki ve kültürel normların ülkemizde de tartışılmaya açılması amacıyla resüssitasyon işleminde hastanın otonomi hakkı, yararsızlık prensibi, resüssitasyonu sonlandırma, resüssitasyonu kimlerin yapması gerektiği, resüssitasyon esnasında hasta yakınlarıyla ilişkiler konularında, kendi fikirlerimizi mevcut kılavuzlar ve literatür bilgileri ışığında özetlemeye çalıştık.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSAN, O., ERYILMAZ, M., YOKUŞOĞLU, M. (2022). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the view of ethics and law. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5, 374–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/437107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baskett PJ, Steen PA, Bossaert L; European Resuscitation Council. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 8. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation 2005; 67 Suppl 1: S171-80
  2. Böttiger BW, Grabner C, Bauer H, Bode C, Weber T, Motsch J, et al. Long term outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with physician staffed emergency medical services: the Utstein style applied to a midsized urban/suburban area. Heart 1999; 82: 674-9
  3. Kurtipek Ö. Kardiyopulmoner resüssitasyonun etik yönü. Türkiye Klinikleri J Int Med Sci 2007; 3: 92-6
  4. Cantor MD, Braddock CH 3rd, Derse AR, Edwards DM, Logue GL, Nelson W, et al. Do-not-resuscitate orders and medical futility. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2689-94
  5. Halperin H, Paradis N, Mosesso V Jr, Nichol G, Sayre M, Ornato JP, et al. Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration's "Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research": a special report from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007; 116: 1855-63
  6. Australian Resuscitation Council. Adult advanced life support: Australian Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2006. Emerg Med Australas 2006; 18: 337-56
  7. Holley JL, Davison SN, Moss AH. Nephrologists' changing practices in reported end-of-life decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 107-11
  8. Berger JT. The ethics of deactivating implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 631-4
  9. Swor R, Compton S. Estimating cost-effectiveness of mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation training strategies to improve survival from cardiac arrest in private locations. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004; 8: 420-3
  10. Nichol G, Valenzuela T, Roe D, Clarc L, Huszti E, Wells GA. Cost effectiveness of defibrillation by targeted responders in public settings. Circulation 2003; 108: 697-703
  11. Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, Teno J, Connors AF Jr, Desbiens N, et al. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 1-12
  12. Kennedy BJ. Communicating with patients about advanced ca