Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Clinical outcome and factors affecting surgical decision for repair versus replacement in patients with mitral regurgitation

Mitral kapak yetmezliğinin cerrahi tedavisinde onarım veya replasman seçimini etkileyen faktörler ve klinik sonuçlar

Pages
358–366
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The choice of surgical technique depended on the etiology of MR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to identify characteristics differentiating patients undergoing mitral valve replacement versus valve repair for mitral regurgitation (MR) and to investigate retrospectively mid-term clinical and functional outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: From January, 2004 to January, 2009 146 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (62 male / 84 female; age: 55.9±13.6 [18-80] years) by one surgical team.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The choice of surgical technique depended on the etiology of MR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to identify characteristics differentiating patients undergoing mitral valve replacement versus valve repair for mitral regurgitation (MR) and to investigate retrospectively mid-term clinical and functional outcomes. Methods: From January, 2004 to January, 2009 146 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (62 male / 84 female; age: 55.9±13.6 [18-80] years) by one surgical team. Mitral valve replacement was performed in 101 patients (69.2%) and valve repair was performed in 45 patients (30.8%). Mean follow-up time was 586±413 days. Life tables were constructed for the analysis of 5-year complication free survival and comparisons were performed between the groups using Log-rank test within 95%CI. Results: The choice of surgical technique depended on the etiology of MR. Degenerative (p

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı farklı etiyolojiler nedeniyle ciddi mitral kapak yetmezliği (MY) gelişmiş hastalarda gerçekleştirilen mitral kapak replasmanı (MVR) ve onarım (MVO) kararlarını etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi, orta dönem klinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarının retrospektif gözlemle irdelenmesidir. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde bir cerrahi ekip tarafından Ocak 2004/Ocak 2009 tarihleri arasında 146 mitral kapak operasyonu (62 erkek / 84 kadın; yaş: 55.9±13.6 [18-80] yıl) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bunlardan 101 (%69.2) hastaya mitral kapak replasmanı (MVR), 45 (%30.8) hastaya mitral kapak onarımı (MVO) yapılmıştır. Ortalama takip süresi 586±413 gündü. Beş yıllık komplikasyonsuz sağkalım veri analizleri için yaşam tabloları kurgulandı, karşılaştırmalar %95 güven aralığında Log-rank testi kullanılarak elde edildi. Bulgular: Örneklemde onarım veya replasman seçiminde MY etiyolojisi önemli rol oynamıştır. Dejeneratif (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇKAP, M., BARAN, Ç., ÖZYURDA, Ü., AKYÜREK, Ö., ZAİM, Ç., DURDU, S., AKAR, A. R., ALTIN, T., KAYA, C. T. (2022). Clinical outcome and factors affecting surgical decision for repair versus replacement in patients with mitral regurgitation. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 358–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/436801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006
  2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003
  3. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation 1995
  4. David TE, Burns RJ, Bacchus CM, Druck MN. Mitral valve replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without preservation of chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984
  5. Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, Abdallah F, Celestin JA, Meimoun P, et al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001
  6. 104(12 Suppl 1): I-8-I-11. 6. Gillinov AM, Faber CN, Sabik JF, Pettersson G, Griffin BP, Gordon SM, et al. Endocarditis after mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2002
  7. Jokinen JJ, Hippelainen MJ, Pitkanen OA, Hartikainen JE. Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007
  8. Savage EB, Ferguson TB Jr., DiSesa VJ. Use of mitral valve repair: analysis of contemporary United States experience reported to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2003
  9. Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, Peterson ED, Rankin JS, O'Brien SM, et al. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2009
  10. Carpentier AF, Lessana A, Relland JY, Belli E, Mihaileanu S, Berrebi AJ, et al. The "physio-ring": an advanced concept in mitral valve annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1995
  11. Maslow AD, Regan MM, Haering JM, Johnson RG, Levine RA. Echocardiographic predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve after mitral valve reconstruction for myxomatous valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999
  12. Enriquez-Sarano M, Akins CW, Vahanian A. Mitral regurgitation. Lancet 2009
  13. Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint