Evaluating patients for CRT, what is relevant: identifying responders or estimating the amount of potential response?

References (8)

1. Parsai C, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR, Baltabaeva A, Claus P, Marciniak M, et al. Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 940-9
2. Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, Steendijk P, Boersma E, Dibbets- Schneider P, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 33-41
3. Ypenburg C, Roes SD, Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, de Roos A, Schalij MJ, et al. Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 657-60
4. Ypenburg C, Sieders A, Bleeker GB, Holman ER, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, et al. Myocardial contractile reserve predicts improvement in left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 1160-5
5. Parsai C, Baltabaeva A, Anderson L, Chaparro M, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR. Low-dose dobutamine stress echo to quantify the degree of remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 950-8
6. Pugliese M, Minardi G, Vitali A, Natale E, De Girolamo P, Zampi G, et al. Influence of myocardial viability on responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective observational cohort study. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2012; 12: 132-41
7. Marwick TH. Stress echocardiography. Heart 2003; 89: 113-8
8. Vidal B, Delgado V, Mont L, Poyatos S, Silva E, Angeles Castel M, et al. Decreased likelihood of response to cardiac resynchronization in patients with severe heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2010; 12: 283-7.