SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 8

İstmusa bağımlı atriyal flatter sırasında iletim hızı ve iletim alanının yeni bir yöntemle değerlendirilmesi

Novel method to evaluate the conduction velocity and conducting area during isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

Kazuo MATSUMOTO
Zekeriya a KÜÇÜKDURMAZ
Ritsushi KATO
Motoki HARA
Takeshi TOBİUME
Hitoshi ISHİDA
Masahiro UENİSHİ
Yurika ISHİZUKA
Nobuyuki KOMİYAMA
Shigeyuki NİSHİMURA
Ali ERDEM
Ebru GÖLCÜK
Pages
711–716
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: In total, the CV of the LS was significantly slower than other areas (m/sec: US, 0.57±0.18; LS, 0.43±0.18; UL, 0.60±0.26; LL, 0.53±0.20; I, 0.50±0.17; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The difference of the conduction velocity (CV) around the tricuspid valve annulus between the counter-clockwise (CCW) atrial flutter and the clockwise (CW) atrial flutter has not been well clarified.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The electroanatomical mapping was performed during the tachycardia for 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 61±16 years) with isthmusdependent atrial flutter (CCW, 25; CW, 5).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: In total, the CV of the LS was significantly slower than other areas (m/sec: US, 0.57±0.18; LS, 0.43±0.18; UL, 0.60±0.26; LL, 0.53±0.20; I, 0.50±0.17; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The difference of the conduction velocity (CV) around the tricuspid valve annulus between the counter-clockwise (CCW) atrial flutter and the clockwise (CW) atrial flutter has not been well clarified. This study was undertaken to evaluate the CV and the conducting area (CA) per millisecond around the tricuspid valve annulus using the electroanatomical mapping. Methods: The electroanatomical mapping was performed during the tachycardia for 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 61±16 years) with isthmusdependent atrial flutter (CCW, 25; CW, 5). We measured the CV and the CA of five divided areas of the right atrium, that is, upper septum (US), lower septum (LS), isthmus (I), upper lateral wall (UL) and lower lateral wall (LL) using the novel measurement method in the isochronal map. Statistical differences of these data between the two groups were assessed by the Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance methods. Results: In total, the CV of the LS was significantly slower than other areas (m/sec: US, 0.57±0.18; LS, 0.43±0.18; UL, 0.60±0.26; LL, 0.53±0.20; I, 0.50±0.17; p

Özet

Amaç: Tipik (CCW) ve ters tipik (CW) atriyal flatterların triküspit kapak anülüsü etrafındaki ileti hızlarının farkı hala tam olarak aydınlatılmamıştır. Bu çalışma, triküspit kapak anülüsü etrafındaki ileti hızı (CV) ve iletim alanının (CA) (msn) elektroanatomik haritalama ile değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Yöntemler: İstmus bağımlı atriyal flatteri olan (CCW 25; CW 5) ardışık 30 hastada (ortalama yaş 61±16), taşikardi sırasında elektoanatomik haritalama uygulandı. CV ve CA ölçümlerini, üst septum (US), alt septum (LS), istmus (I), üst lateral duvar (UL) ve alt lateral duvar (LL) olmak üzere sağ atriyumun beş bölgesinde isokronal haritada yeni ölçüm metotları ile yaptık. Bulgular: Toplamda LS’nin CV’si diğer bölgelere kıyasla belirgin derecede yavaş idi (m/sec: US, 0.57±0.18; LS, 0.43±0.18; UL, 0.60±0.26; LL, 0.53±0.20; I, 0.50±0.17; p

🔖

Cite This Article

MATSUMOTO, K., KÜÇÜKDURMAZ, Z. A., KATO, R., HARA, M., TOBİUME, T., ISHİDA, H., UENİSHİ, M., ISHİZUKA, Y., KOMİYAMA, N., NİSHİMURA, S., ERDEM, A., GÖLCÜK, E. (2022). İstmusa bağımlı atriyal flatter sırasında iletim hızı ve iletim alanının yeni bir yöntemle değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 8, 711–716. https://ajindex.com/articles/436556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Waldo AL. Pathogenesis of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9 (suppl): S18-25
  2. Cabrera JA, Sanchez-Quintana D, Ho SY, Medina A, Anderson RH. The architecture of the atrial musculature between the orifice of the inferior caval vein and the tricuspid valve: The anatomy of the isthmus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 1186-95
  3. Olshansky B, Okumura K, Hess PG, Waldo AL. Demonstration of an area of slow conduction in human atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 1639-48
  4. Feld GK, Fleck RP, Chen PS, Boyce K, Bahnson TD, Stein JB, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter: Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation 1992;86: 1233-40
  5. Cosio FG, Lopez-Gil M, Goicolea A, Arribas F, Barroso JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava, cavotricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 705-9
  6. Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Mooney CR, Miller CB, Wylds AC, Hudson RD, et al. Natural and evoked atrial flutter due to circus movement in dogs. Role of abnormal atrial pathways, slow conduction, nonuniform refractory period distribution and premature beats. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45: 1167- 81
  7. Lin JL, Lai LP, Lin LJ, Tseng YZ, Lien WP, Huang SK. Electrophysiological determinant for induction of isthmus dependent counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter in humans. Heart 1999; 81: 73-81
  8. Nakagawa H, Jackman WM. Use of three-dimensional, nonfluoroscopic mapping system for catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 1279-86
  9. Hassankhani A, Yao B, Feld G. Conduction velocity around the tricuspid valve annulus during type 1 atrial flutter: defining the location of areas of slow conduction by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2003; 8: 121-7
  10. Shilling RJ, Peters NS, Goldberger J, Kadish AH, Davies DW. Characterization of the anatomy and conduction velocities of the human right atrial flutter circuit determined by noncontact mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 385-93
  11. Feld GK, Mollerus M, Birgersdotter-Green U, Fujimura O, Bahnson TD, Boyce K, et al. Conduction velocity in the tricuspid valveinferior vena cava isthmus is slower in patients with type I atrial flutter compared to those without a history of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8: 1338-48
  12. Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, Lee SH, Ueng K