Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Türkiye’de antenatal tanısı konmuş doğumsal kalp anomalilerinde danışmanlık ve sonuçları

Counseling and outcomes of antenatally diagnosed congenital heart anomalies in Turkey

Pages
137–145
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our practice and the findings reported herein support the efficacy of this staging system and counseling parents of fetuses for congenital heart diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes and decisions of families of fetuses with prenatally-diagnosed cardiac abnormalities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Prenatally diagnosed cases (n=155) with congenital heart disease were retrospectively categorized according to the Allan-Huggon grading system: Group A (cardiac disease associated with severe / lethal extracardiac disease); Group B1 (low risk with a postnatal prognosis); Group B2 (moderate risk, amenable to surgical repair with a low mortality); and Group B3 (high risk, associated with high mortality after surgery).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our practice and the findings reported herein support the efficacy of this staging system and counseling parents of fetuses for congenital heart diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes and decisions of families of fetuses with prenatally-diagnosed cardiac abnormalities. Methods: Prenatally diagnosed cases (n=155) with congenital heart disease were retrospectively categorized according to the Allan-Huggon grading system: Group A (cardiac disease associated with severe / lethal extracardiac disease); Group B1 (low risk with a postnatal prognosis); Group B2 (moderate risk, amenable to surgical repair with a low mortality); and Group B3 (high risk, associated with high mortality after surgery). Neonatal outcomes, including termination of pregnancy, were recorded for 18 months of follow-up after counseling the parents. Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Pearson’s Chi-square test and Fischer’s exact Chi-square test were used for statistical analyses. Results: One hundred forty-five cases completed follow up. Thirty-nine cases (Group A) were associated with extracardiac lethal defects and the pregnancies were terminated; these cases were excluded from statistical evaluation. Twenty parents in Group B3 opted also for termination. The survival rates of ongoing pregnancies after 18 months of follow-up between the three cardiac abnormality Groups (Group B1, n=37; Group B2, n=12; and Group B3, n=37) were 89.2%, 66.7%, and 13.5%, respectively. Significance was present between the survival rates of the three Groups [Group B3 vs. Group B1: p=0.0001; OR: 52.8 (12.9-214.5); Group B3 vs. Group B2: p=0.0009; OR: 12.8 (2.8-58.9); Group B2 vs. Group B1: p=0.087; OR: 4.12 (0.84-20.2)]. Conclusion: Our practice and the findings reported herein support the efficacy of this staging system and counseling parents of fetuses for congenital heart diseases.

Özet

Amaç: Prenatal tanı almış, fetal kalp anomalilerinin, klinik sonuçları ve aile kararlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yöntemler: Prenatal doğumsal kalp anomali tanısı konmuş olgular (n=155), retrospektif yöntemle Allan ve Huggon’ın sınıflandırması doğrultusunda, Grup A (doğumsal kalp anomalisine eşlik eden ağır / ölümcül kalp dışı patoloji); Grup B1 (postnatal prognoz açısından düşük risk), Grup B2 (orta risk, düşük mortalite oranı ile uyumlu cerrahi mortalite) ve Grup B3 (yüksek risk-cerrahi sonrası için yüksek mortalite) olarak sınıflandırıldı. Ailelere verilen, danışma sonrası yenidoğan verileri, buna gebelik sonlandırması dahil edilmiştir ve 18 ay süreyle izlendi. Bulgular: Olguların 145’inin izlemi tam olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Otuz dokuz olguda (Grup A) eşlik eden ölümcül kalp dışı anomaliler saptanmıştır ve bunların gebelik sonlandırılmasına karar verilmiştir; bu olgular istatistiksel değerlendirmeye alınmamıştır. Grup B3’ teki olguların 20 tanesi de gebelik sonlandırmasına karar verdi. Diğer üç kalp anomalisi gruplarında, gebeliğin devamına karar veren ailelerde (Grup B1, n=37; Grup B2, n=12; Grup B3, n=37), 18 ayın sonunda sağkalım oranları sırasıyla %89.2, %66.7 ve %13.5 bulunmuştur. İstatistiksel verilerin değerlendirmesinde Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Pearson’s Ki-kare testi ve Fischer’s exact Ki-kare testi uygulanmıştır. Sağkalım açısından 3 grupta istatistiksel anlamlılık saptanmıştır [Grup B3 ile Grup B1: p=0.0001; OR: 52.8 (12.9-214.5); Grup B3 ile Grup B2: p=0.0009; OR: 12.8 (2.8-58.9); Grup B2 ile Grup B1: p=0.087; OR: 4.12 (0.84-20.2)]. Sonuç: Uygulamalarımız ve istatistiksel sonuçlarımız, bu sınıflama sisteminin, doğumsal kalp anomalileri açısından ebeveynlere verilecek danışmada etkili olduğunu gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, G., GEDİKBAŞI, A., ÖZTARHAN, K., CEYLAN, Y., GÜL, A. (2022). Türkiye’de antenatal tanısı konmuş doğumsal kalp anomalilerinde danışmanlık ve sonuçları. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 137–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/436524

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890-900
  2. Yagel S, Cohen SM, Achiron R. Examination of the fetal heart by five short-axis views: a proposed screening method for comprehensive cardiac evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 367-9
  3. Jenkins PC, Flanagan MF, Jenkins KJ, Sargent JD, Canter CE, Chinnock RE, et al. Morbidities in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2004; 25: 3-10
  4. Lee K, Khoshnood B, Chen L, Wall SN, Cromie WJ, Mittendorf RL. Infant mortality from congenital malformations in the United States, 1970-1997. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 620-7
  5. Lian ZH, Zack MM, Erickson JD. Paternal age and the occurrence of birth defects. Am J Hum Genet 1986; 39: 648-60
  6. Gembruch U. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 1283-98
  7. Bosi G, Garani G, Scorrano M, Calzolari E; IMER Working Party. Temporal variability in birth prevalence of congenital heart defects as recorded by a general birth defects registry. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 690-8
  8. Garne E, Stoll C, Clementi M; Euroscan Group. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 386-91
  9. Montana E, Khoury MJ, Cragan JD, Sharma S, Dhar P, Fyfe D. Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations by fetal echocardiography in a well defined birth population, Atlanta, Georgia, 1990-1994. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1805-9
  10. Allan LD, Cook A, Sullivan I, Sharland GK. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: effects of fetal echocardiography on birth prevalence. Lancet 1991; 337: 959-61
  11. Jaeggi ET, Scholler GF, Jones OD, Cooper SG. Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre versus postnatally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: a population based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 380-5
  12. Menahem S, Grimwade J. Pre-natal counseling- helping couples make decisions following the diagnosis of severe heart disease. Early Hum Dev 2005; 81: 601-7
  13. Hunfeld JA, Tempels A, Passchier J, Hazebroek FW, Tibboel D. Parental burden and grief one year after the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly. J Pediatr Psychol 1999; 24: 515-20
  14. Allan LD, Huggon IC. Counseling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 1136-42
  15. Cooper MJ, Enderlein MA, Dyson DC, Roge CL, Tarnoff H. Fetal