Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Aktif kanama ve kanama riski yüksek olan hastalarda perkütan koroner girişim

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with active bleeding or high bleeding risk

Pages
165–170
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If the benefits outweigh the risk, then the patient can undergo PCI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCT) supporting percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high bleeding risk or active bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bleeding in the peri- PCI period also increases mortality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If the benefits outweigh the risk, then the patient can undergo PCI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCT) supporting percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high bleeding risk or active bleeding. The management decisions are based on extrapolation of subgroups data in RCTs or experts’ opinions. Bleeding in the peri- PCI period also increases mortality. In general, PCI can be performed if bleeding can be stopped by mechanical means (compressing or ligating the artery) and the patient can tolerate 4 hours of anticoagulant without further bleeding. For patient with acquired or inherited high risk of bleeding, anecdotal reports showed that either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin would be acceptable for PCI. For patients on chronic oral anticoagulants, PCI could be performed without new antithrombotic therapy if the international ratio (INR) is between 2 and 3. Antiplatelet therapy would be needed if new thrombi are detected at the index artery. Ultimately, the decision to perform PCI or treat the patient conservatively must be managed on a case-by-case basis. If the benefits outweigh the risk, then the patient can undergo PCI.

Özet

Kanama riski yüksek veya aktif kanaması olan hastalarda perkütan koroner girişimi (PKG) destekleyen randomize klinik çalışmalardan (RKÇ) elde edilen kanıt eksikliği vardır. Takip kararları RKÇ'lerdeki subgrup analizine veya uzman görüşlerine dayanmaktadır. Kanama peri-PKG dönemdeki mortaliteyi de artırmaktadır. Genel olarak, kanama mekanik yöntemlerle (sıkıştırma ya da arterin bağlanması) durdurulabilecekse ve hastanın daha fazla kanaması olmadan antikoagülanı 4 saat tolere edebilecekse, PKG gerçekleştirilebilir. Edinsel veya kalıtsal kanama riski yüksek olan hasta için, anekdot raporları ya anfraksiyone heparin veya bivalirudinin PKG için kabul edebileceğini gösterdi. Oral antikoagülanları kronik alan hastalar için, uluslararası normalleştirme oranı (UNO) 2 ve 3 arasında ise PKG yeni antitrombotik tedavi olmaksızın PKG yapılabilmektedir. Belirlenen arterde eğer yeni trombüs tespit edilirse, antitrombosit tedavi gerekli olmalıdır. Sonuçta, PKG gerçekleştirmek veya konservatif hasta tedavisi kararı her bir olgu için ayrı ayrı takibi gerektirir. Yararları risklerinden fazla ise o zaman hastaya PKG uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NGUYEN, J., NGUYEN, T. (2022). Aktif kanama ve kanama riski yüksek olan hastalarda perkütan koroner girişim. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 165–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/436231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Nguyen T, Nguyen L. Coronary interventions in patients with bleeding and bleeding tendency. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2007; 4: 56-65
  2. Adesanya AO, de Lemos JA, Greilich NB, Whitten CW. Management of perioperative myocardial infarction in noncardiac surgical patients. Chest 2006; 130: 584-96. [CrossRef] 3. Berger BP Bellot V, Bell MR, Horlocker TT, Rihal CS, Hallett JW, et al. An immediate invasive strategy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction early after noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 1100-02. [CrossRef] 4. Feit F, Voeltz MD, Attubato MJ, Lincoff AM, Chew DP Bittl JA, et al. Predictors and impact of major hemorrhage on mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention from the REPLACE-2 Trial. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1364-9. [CrossRef] 5. Manoukian SV, Feit F, Mehran R, Voeltz MD, Ebrahimi R, Hamon M, et al. Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1362-8. [CrossRef] 6. Gaglia MA Jr, Torguson R, Gonzalez MA, Ben-Dor I, Maluenda G, Collins SD, et al. Correlates and consequences of gastrointestinal bleeding complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 1069-74. [CrossRef] 7. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: 574-651. [CrossRef] 8. Steg PG, Huber K, Andreotti F, Arnesen H, Atar D, Badimon L, et al. Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 1854-64. [CrossRef] 9. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction).Circulation 2004; 110: 588-636. [CrossRef] 10. O'Donoghue ML, Braunwald E, Antman EM, Murphy SA, Bates ER, Rozenman Y, et al. Pharmacodynamic effect and