Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 8

Reliability and validity of the Turkish form of the eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale in hypertensive patients

Pages
692–700
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Scores of medication adherence were observed to be affected by low economic condition and city where said individuals reside.Conclusion: It was determined that levels of reliability and validity of Turkish version of 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale is acceptable

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale.Methods: The study was conducted as a methodological design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 196 patients with hypertension who applied to the Family Health Centers in three different regions of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Scores of medication adherence were observed to be affected by low economic condition and city where said individuals reside.Conclusion: It was determined that levels of reliability and validity of Turkish version of 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale is acceptable
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale.Methods: The study was conducted as a methodological design. The study included 196 patients with hypertension who applied to the Family Health Centers in three different regions of Turkey. Data were collected from February-June 2012. Methods used in the analysis included factor analysis, assessment of Cronbach’s α test and item-total correlation in order to perform psychometric measurements. Variables influencing scores of medication adherence were determined using logistic regression analysis. Results: Factor loadings of all items in the scale were above 0.40, and the variation explained was determined to be 42.4. The Turkish form consisted of a single domain. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the items in the scale was 0.79. Item-total correlations of items in the scale were between 0. 30 and 0. 62. Scores of medication adherence were observed to be affected by low economic condition and city where said individuals reside.Conclusion: It was determined that levels of reliability and validity of Turkish version of 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale is acceptable

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞILAR, R. H., GÖZÜM, S., ÇAPIK, C., MORİSKY, D. E. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Turkish form of the eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale in hypertensive patients. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 8, 692–700. https://ajindex.com/articles/436034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Laucka PV, Trotter JM. Medication management of hypertension. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 2001; 17: 61-82. [CrossRef] 2. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Whelton PK, He J. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 11-9. [CrossRef] 3. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217-23. [CrossRef] 4. Altun B, Arıcı M, Nergizoğlu G, Derici U, Karatan O, Turgan C, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Turkey (the PatenT study) in 2003. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1817-23. [CrossRef] 5. Arıcı M, Turgan C, Altun B, Sindel S, Erbay B, Derici U, et al. Hypertension incidence in Turkey (HinT): a population-based study. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 240-4. [CrossRef] 6. Düsing R. Overcoming barriers to effective blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 1545-52. [CrossRef] 7. Ogedegbe G. Barriers to optimal hypertension control. Hypertension. Curriculum Review. J Clin Hypertens 2008; 10: 644-6. [CrossRef] 8. Çakmak HA, Arslan E, Erdine S. (Unmet needs in hypertension). Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2009; 37: 1-4. 9. Clark LT, Afflu E. Antihypertensive therapy: Factors affecting medication compliance and blood pressure control. The American J Manager Care 1995; 1: 289-94. 10. Hill MN, Miller NH. Compliance to antihypertensive treatment. In Primary Hypertension, 3rd edn, Izzo JL & Black HR eds; Kazancı G translationed. Nobel Publication, İstanbul, 2004.p.390-3. 11. Krousel-Wood M, Thomas S, Muntner P, Morisky D. Medication adherence: a key factor in achieving blood pressure control and good clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Curr Opin Cardiol 2004; 19: 357-62. [CrossRef] 12. Coleman DJ. Medication compliance in the elderly. J Commun Nurs 2005; 19: 4-6. 13. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. NEJM 2005; 353: 487-97. [CrossRef] 14. Hacıhasanoğlu R. Responsibilities of the nurse in hypertension management. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi 2009; 4: 153-64. 15. Gözüm S, Hacıhasanoğlu R. Reliability and validity of the Turkish adaptation of medication adherence self-efficacy scale in hypertensive patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009; 8: 129-36. [CrossRef] 16. Hacıhasanoğlu R, Gözüm S, Çapık C. Validity of the Turkish version of the medication adherence self-efficacy scale-short form in hypertensive patients. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2012; 12: 241-8. 17. Moris