Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of South Korean Art Education in the Context of Structure, Education and Culture

Güney Kore Sanat Eğitiminin Yapı, Eğitim ve Kültür Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
111–149
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the interviews, it is seen that South Korean art education has an understanding that aims to improve the creativity, cultural literacy and critical thinking skills of students, and that traditional arts such as lavish, calligraphy and ceramics are used in the art education courses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to reveal the thoughts and opinions of South Korean art educators about the understanding of art education of South Korean elementary and secondary schools in terms of structural, cultural and educational aspects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 7 people, working as art educators in South Korea and at the Korean Culture Centre in Ankara, took place in the study group of the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the interviews, it is seen that South Korean art education has an understanding that aims to improve the creativity, cultural literacy and critical thinking skills of students, and that traditional arts such as lavish, calligraphy and ceramics are used in the art education courses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the thoughts and opinions of South Korean art educators about the understanding of art education of South Korean elementary and secondary schools in terms of structural, cultural and educational aspects. Interview method was used in this research which was designed by qualitative research method. In the light of the literature sources studied, interview questions were created in order to comprehend the structural, cultural and education characteristics of the art education courses. A total of 7 people, working as art educators in South Korea and at the Korean Culture Centre in Ankara, took place in the study group of the research. The data obtained as a result of the interview were translated into Turkish. The collected data were analysed with the content analysis method in terms of common features and divided into three categories as structural, cultural and education. According to the results of the interviews, it is seen that South Korean art education has an understanding that aims to improve the creativity, cultural literacy and critical thinking skills of students, and that traditional arts such as lavish, calligraphy and ceramics are used in the art education courses. The use of religious and political symbols and images representing religious rituals in paintings is considered to be inconvenient. In addition, according to South Korean contemporary art education understanding, visual and popular culture products are tried to be integrated with traditional art in art lessons. It has been revealed that the participants have not carried out any study about Turkish culture and art during their lessons.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Güney Kore ilkokul ve ortaokul kurumlarının sanat eğitimianlayışının yapısal, kültürel ve eğitim açısından incelemektir. Nitel araştırma türlerinden temelnitel araştırma yaklaşımı ile desenlenen araştırmada görüşme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. İncelenenliteratür kaynakları ışığında sanat eğitimi derslerinin yapısal, kültürel ve eğitim özelliklerinianlamaya yönelik görüşme soruları oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunda GüneyKore'de ve Ankara Kore Kültür Merkezi’nde sanat eğitimcisi olarak görev yapan toplamda 7 kişiyer almaktadır. Araştırma verileri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır.Elde edilen veriler Türkçe diline çevrilmiştir. Alınan veriler betimsel analiz ile ortak özellikleribakımından irdelenerek yapısal, kültürel ve eğitim olmak üzere üç açıdan değerlendirilmiştir.Görüşmelerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre Güney Kore sanat eğitiminin, öğrencilerin yaratıcılığını,kültür okuryazarlığını ve eleştirel düşünme becerisini geliştirmeyi hedefleyen bir anlayışa sahipolduğu, sanat eğitimi derslerinde lavi, hat, seramik gibi geleneksel halk sanatlarındanfaydalanıldığı anlaşılmaktadır. Dinsel ve siyasi semboller, dini ritüelleri temsil eden görsellerinresimlerde kullanılması sakıncalı görülmektedir. Bunun yanında Güney Kore çağdaş sanat eğitimianlayışına göre sanat derslerinde görsel ve popüler kültür ürünleri geleneksel sanatlabütünleştirilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Katılımcıların derslerinde Türk kültürü ve sanatı hakkındaherhangi bir inceleme yapmadıkları ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZALP, H. K., ÖZDEMİR, S. (2022). Evaluation of South Korean Art Education in the Context of Structure, Education and Culture. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 111–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/435903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aytekin Koç G., Tertemiz (Işık) N. (2018). PISA Sonuçlarının (2003-2015) Eğitim Sistemi ve Ekonomik Göstergeler Kapsamında İncelenmesi: Türkiye ve Güney Kore Örneği, Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 103-128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.004.
  2. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Byun, S. Y., Schofer, E. ve Kim, K. K. (2012). Revisiting the Role of Cultural Capital in East Asian Educational Systems: The Case of South Korea, Sociology of Education 85(3) 219–239. doi: 10.1177/0038040712447180. Chae, H. S. (2004). Talking back to the Asian model minority discourse: Korean‐origin youth experiences in high school, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25(1), 59-73. doi: 10.1080/07256860410001687027. Chang, I. S. (2012). Multicultural Education in Korea: Its Origin, Status, and Direction, Multicultural Education Review, 4(2), 60-90. doi: 10.1080/2005615X.2011.11102894 Cho, Y., Chung, H., Choi, K., Suh, Y., Seo, C. (2011). The Creativity of Korean Leaders and its Implications for Creativity Education, Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 235- 257. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Nitel araştırmacılar için 30 temel beceri. (H. Özcan, Çeviri). Ankara:
  4. Anı Yayınları.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research, (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Güney Kore Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2015). Erişim Adresi: http://ncic.kice.re.kr Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2019.
  6. Jang, S. & Kim, N. (2004). Transition from high school to higher education and work in Korea, from the competency-based education perspective, International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 691–703.
  7. Jon, J. E. (2009). Interculturality in higher education as student intercultural learning and development: a case study in South Korea, Intercultural Education 20(5). doi: 10.1080/14675980903371308. Kang, Y. (2015). Art and Art Education in the Multicultural Society of South Korea. Journal of Art for Life, 6(1), 2-13.
  8. Kang, S. W. (2010). Multicultural education and the rights to education of migrant children in South Korea, Educational Review, 62(3), 287-300. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2010.503599. Kırbaşoğlu Kılıç, L. & Bayram, B. (2014). Postmodernı̇zm ve eğı̇tı̇m, Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 3(1), 368-376.
  9. Kim, H. (2015). Community and art: creative education fostering resilience through art, Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 16:193–201. doi: 10.1007/s12564-015-9371-z. Kim, H. (2014). E