Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

The Burden of Urinary Incontinence on Caregivers andEvaluation of Its Impact on Their Emotional Status

Pages
43–48
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It is important not only in psychiatric patients, but also in those with other chronic disease processes, to evaluate the mental status of caregivers and to support them in dealing with the problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate caregivers of children with urinary incontinence in terms of the caregiving burden and its associated manifestations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Caregivers of children who are being treated for urinary incontinence secondary to neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) were evaluated for caregiver burden (Zarit score), depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]), and anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It is important not only in psychiatric patients, but also in those with other chronic disease processes, to evaluate the mental status of caregivers and to support them in dealing with the problem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate caregivers of children with urinary incontinence in terms of the caregiving burden and its associated manifestations. Methods: Caregivers of children who are being treated for urinary incontinence secondary to neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) were evaluated for caregiver burden (Zarit score), depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]), and anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]). Additionally, children were evaluated for dysfunctional voiding score. All scores were statistically analyzed for correlation with and relation to the caregiver’s emotional status. Results: Zarit score was equal in caregivers of children with neurogenic and non-neurogenic LUTD. BDI score was higher in caregivers of patients with neurogenic LUTD, whereas BAI score was higher in caregivers of patients with non-neurogenic LUTD. In the evaluation performed, considering the etiological difference, Zarit score in the group with non-neurogenic LUTD correlated positively with BAI and BDI scores. In the neurogenic bladder group, Zarit score correlated with BDI score. Conclusion: It is important not only in psychiatric patients, but also in those with other chronic disease processes, to evaluate the mental status of caregivers and to support them in dealing with the problem.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRLI, E. A., TÜRK, Ş., KIRLI, S. (2022). The Burden of Urinary Incontinence on Caregivers andEvaluation of Its Impact on Their Emotional Status. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 43–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/435219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Dillehay R, Sandys M. Caregivers for Alzheimer’s patients: what we are learning from research. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990
  2. 30(4):263-85. [Crossref] 2. Winefield HR, Harvey EJ. Needs of family care-givers in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1994
  3. 20(3):557-566. [Crossref] 3. Silver JH, Wellman N. Family caregiver training is needed to improve outcomes for older adults using homecare technologies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2002
  4. 102(6):831-836. [Crossref] 4. Caqueo-Urízar A, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J. Burden of care in families of patients with schizophrenia. Qual Life Res. 2006
  5. 15(4):719-724. [Crossref] 5. Perlick DA, Rosenheck RR, Clarkin JF, et al. Impact of family burden and patient symptom status on clinical outcome in bipolar affective disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001
  6. 189(1):31-37. [Crossref] 6. McPherson HM, Dore GM, Loan PA, et al. Socioeconomic characteristics of a Dunedin sample of bipolar patients. N Z Med J. 1992
  7. 105(933):161- 162. 7. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980
  8. 20(6)649-655. [Crossref] 8. Ayan S, Topsakal K, Gokce G, et al. Efficacy of combined anticholinergic treatment and behavioral modification as a first line treatment for nonneurogenic and non anatomical voiding dysfunction in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2007
  9. 177(6):2325-2328. [Crossref] 9. Stein R, Bogaert G, Doğan HS, et al. EAU/ESPU Guideline on the management of neurogenic bladder in children and adolescent part I diagnostic and conservative treatment. Neurourol Urodynam 2020
  10. 39(1):45-57. [Crossref] 10. Kakizaki H, Kita M, Watanobe M, et al. Pathophysiological and therapetic considerations for non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2016
  11. 8(2):75-85. [Crossref] 11. Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, et al. The standardization of ter-minology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the international children’s continence society. Neurourol Urodynam. 2016
  12. 35(4):471-481. [Crossref] 12. Chase J, Austin P, Hoebeke P, et al. The management of dysfunctional voiding in children: a report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. 2010
  13. 183(4):1296- 1302. [Crossref] 13. Hoebeke P, Renson C, Petillon L, et al. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with therapy resistant non-neuropathic bladder sphinc