Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Structural Equation Model of Personality Traits,Psychopathology, and Nonverbal Immediacy Behavior

Pages
19–24
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Students’ SCL-90-R scores positively predicted the NIS-STr scores in a statistically negative way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between personality traits, psychopathology, and nonverbal immediacy behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 336 university students aged 18 and over.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Students’ SCL-90-R scores positively predicted the NIS-STr scores in a statistically negative way.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between personality traits, psychopathology, and nonverbal immediacy behaviors. The study gains importance because of the fact that personality traits, psychopathology, and the concept of nonverbal immediacy have not been studied together in Turkish culture.Methods: The research sample was created with the convenience sampling method, one of the nonrandom sampling methods. The sample consisted of 336 university students aged 18 and over. In the study, the 10-Item Personality Inventory, Nonverbal Immediacy Scale-Self Report Form (NIS-STr), Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R), and Communicator Styles Scale were used. To examine the effect of personality traits on SCL-90-R and the effect of SCL-90-R scores on nonverbal immediacy behavior, a structural equation model was used and the path analysis of the model was created.Results: Although it was determined that the scores for conscientiousness, emotional stability, and extraversion in the scale of resilience to the scope of the study did not significantly predict the SCL-90-R scores (P > 0.05), the scores for agreeableness (β = 0.38, P < 0.05) and openness (β = 0.38, P < 0.05) predicted the SCL-90-R scores significantly and positively. In addition, it was determined that the scores of other applications from the SCL-90-R were similarly significant surrounding other predictors of NIS-STr scores (β = -0.30, P < 0.05).Conclusion: It can be stated that personality traits are predictors of psychopathological symptoms. Students’ SCL-90-R scores positively predicted the NIS-STr scores in a statistically negative way.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKRAY, Z., İNAK, S. (2022). Structural Equation Model of Personality Traits,Psychopathology, and Nonverbal Immediacy Behavior. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/435239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Burger JM. Kişilik. Kaknüs Yayınları; 2016
  2. Kılıç Nurkan M. Çocukluk Çağı Travmalarının, Kişilik Özellikleri ve Psikopatolojik Durum ile İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Master thesis. İstanbul Beykent University; 2016
  3. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Nonverbal behavior and psychopathology. In: Friedman RJ, Katz MM, eds. The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary Theory and Research. Winston & Sons; 1974
  4. Atak H. The Turkish adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013;50(4):312-319. [Crossref] 5. İnanç BY, Yerlikaya EE. Kişilik Kuramları. 15th ed. Pegem Akademi; 2017
  5. Cervone D, Pervin LA. Kişilik Psikolojisi: Kuram ve Araştırma. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2016
  6. Tatlılıoğlu K. Beş Faktör Kişilik Kuramı bağlamında kişilik kavramına genel bir bakış. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2013;3(6):127-146
  7. Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB Jr. A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003;37(6):504-528. [Crossref] 9. Costa PT Jr., McCrae RR. The Five-Factor Model of Personality and its relevance to personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 1992;6(4):343-359. [Crossref] 10. Jensen M. Personality traits and nonverbal communication patterns. Int J Soc Sci Stud. 2016;4(5):57-70. [Crossref] 11. Budak S. Psikoloji Sözlüğü. 3rd ed. Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları; 2005
  8. Lamers SMA, Westerhof GJ, Kovács V, et al. Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five Personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. J Res Pers. 2012;46(5):517-524. [Crossref] 13. Bilen BM. Psikopatolojik Belirtilerin Kişiler Arası İlişki Tarzları ve Temel Kişilik Tipleri Yönünden İncelenmesi. Master thesis. Işık University; 2016
  9. Türk BB. Yetişkinlerde Bağlanma Biçimleri, Kişilik Özellikleri ve Bu Özelliklerin Ruhsal Sorunlarla İlişkisinin Araştırılması. Master thesis. Işık University; 2016
  10. Pinto J, Carvalho J, Nobre PJ. The relationship between the FFM Personality traits, state psychopathology, and sexual compulsivity in a sample of male college students. J Sex Med. 2013:10(7):1773-1782. [Crossref] 16. Fast J. Body Language. Panbooks; 1982
  11. Birdwhistell RL. Kinesics and Context. Essays on Body Motion Communication. University of Pennsylvania Press; 1990
  12. Özbent S. Sınıfta beden dili. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2007;27(2):259- 289
  13. Mehrabian A. Immediacy: an indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. J Pers. 1966;34(1):26-34. [Crossref] 20. Fiquer JT.