Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Stress Response on Behavioral Response of University Students During the Peak Period of COVID-19

Pages
113–120
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that stress response had a significant negative predictive effect on behavioral response (r = −0.489, P < .001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between stress response and behavioral response and to develop a moderated mediation model with stress management and risk cognition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We developed 4 novel questionnaires, namely, stress response questionnaire, behavioral response questionnaire, stress management questionnaire, and risk cognition questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that stress response had a significant negative predictive effect on behavioral response (r = −0.489, P < .001).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between stress response and behavioral response and to develop a moderated mediation model with stress management and risk cognition. Methods: We developed 4 novel questionnaires, namely, stress response questionnaire, behavioral response questionnaire, stress management questionnaire, and risk cognition questionnaire. A total of 5896 university students in China were investigated during the peak period of the coronavirus disease 2019. Results: The results showed that stress response had a significant negative predictive effect on behavioral response (r = −0.489, P < .001). Moreover, stress management had a partial mediating effect between stress response and behavioral response. Risk cognition plays a moderating effect on the mediation model (β = −0.109, P = .030), and the effect of high-risk cognition is more significant. Conclusion: During the coronavirus disease 2019 period, improving the risk awareness of university students will help to enhance the buffering effect of stress management on behavioral response and indirectly reduce their behavioral response.

🔖

Cite This Article

REN, J., REN, H., BİAN, Y., YANG, C., WU, H., Lİ, X., ZHANG, Y., SHİ, H. (2022). Stress Response on Behavioral Response of University Students During the Peak Period of COVID-19. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/435181

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zhan H, Zheng C, Zhang X, et al. Chinese college students' stress and anxiety levels under COVID-19. Front Psychiatry. 2021
  2. 615390. [CrossRef] 2. Beasley M, Thompson T, Davidson J. Resilience in response to life stress: the effects of coping style and cognitive hardiness. Pers Indiv Differ. 2003
  3. 34(1):77-95. [CrossRef] 3. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatr Res. 2020
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Markenson D, Dimaggio C, Redlener I. Preparing health professions students for terrorism, disaster, and public health emergencies: core competencies. Acad Med. 2005
  5. 80(6):517-526. [CrossRef] 5. Villada C, Hidalgo V, Almela M, et al. Individual differences in the psychobiological response to psychosocial stress (Trier Social Stress Test): the relevance of trait anxiety and coping styles. Stress Health. 2016
  6. 32(2):90- 99. [CrossRef] 6. Jarczok MN, Jarczok M, Mauss D, et al. Autonomic nervous system activity and workplace stressors—a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013
  7. 37(8):1810-1823. [CrossRef] 7. Díaz-Hung ML, Martínez G, Hetz C. Emerging roles of the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the nervous system: a link with adaptive behavior to environmental stress? Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2020
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Edelman EJ, Aoun-Barakat L, Villanueva M, et al. Confronting another pandemic: lessons from HIV can inform our COVID-19 response. AIDS Behav. 2020
  9. 24(7):1977-1979. [CrossRef] 9. Jos B, Bart V, Julian T. Generalized unsafety theory of stress: unsafe environments and conditions, and the default stress response. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2018
  10. 15(3):464. [CrossRef] 10. Shabu SA, Amin K, Mahmood KI, et al. Risk perception and behavioral response to COVID-19: A survey of university students and staff in the Iraqi Kurdistan region. Soc Work Public Hlth. 2021
  11. 36(1):1-12. [CrossRef] 11. Antoni MH, Dhabhar FS. The impact of psychosocial stress and stress management on immune responses in patients with cancer. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. Cancer. 2019
  12. 125(9):1417-1431. [CrossRef] 12. Pacák K, Palkovits M. Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocr Rev. 2001
  13. 22(4):502-548. [CrossRef] 13. Kuhlman KR, Chiang JJ, Bower JE, et al. Persistent low positive affect and sleep disturbance across adolescence moderate link between stress and depressive symptoms in early adulthood. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020
  14. 48(1):109-121. [CrossRef] 14. V