Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Reliability and Validity of the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale in Turkish Adolescents

Pages
76–81
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Turkish version of the scale could be used in programs that aim to identify positive mental health literacy levels of adolescents in Turkish society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The present study aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale in the Turkish language.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The sample of the present methodological study included 457 adolescents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Turkish version of the scale could be used in programs that aim to identify positive mental health literacy levels of adolescents in Turkish society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The present study aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale in the Turkish language. Methods: The sample of the present methodological study included 457 adolescents. The data were collected between February 10, 2019, and May 31, 2019, with a sociodemographic data form and the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale. The scale was first translated to the Turkish language, expert opinion was obtained, and a pilot scheme was conducted. The content validity index was employed to test the validity of the scale, confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were conducted to test the construct validity, item analysis was conducted to test the reliability of the scale, Cronbach’s alpha analysis was employed to determine internal consistency, and the test–retest scores were compared to determine time invariance. Results: The scale is unidimensional. The content validity analysis of the scale was 0.97. Scale item loads varied between 0.56 and 0.72 based on the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.87, and the test–retest score was intraclass correlation coefficient=0.739 (P < . 001). The mean participant score on the positive mental health literacy scale was 2.9 (SD=0.9). Conclusion: The validity and reliability findings in the study that was conducted to adapt the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale to the Turkish language revealed that the scale could be used to measure the mental health literacy of adolescents. The Turkish version of the scale could be used in programs that aim to identify positive mental health literacy levels of adolescents in Turkish society.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZPULAT, F., GÜNAYDIN, N., ÖZTAŞ, D. (2022). Reliability and Validity of the Positive Mental Health Literacy Scale in Turkish Adolescents. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 76–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/435174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Demir R, Türk F. Positive psychology: history, basic concepts, therapeutic process, criticisms and contributions. J Int Psychol Couns Guid Res. 2020;2(2):108-125
  2. Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(6):695-706. [CrossRef] 3. Peterson C. The future of optimism. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):44-55. [CrossRef] 4. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5-14. [CrossRef] 5. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227-268. [CrossRef] 6. Pehlivan Ş, Tokur Kesgi NM, Uymaz P. Psychological distress and mental health literacy in university students. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(3):1433-1441. [CrossRef] 7. Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, et al. Mental health literacy: a survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and 91 their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust. 1997;166(4):182-186. [CrossRef] 8. Bjørnsen HN, Eilertsen MEB, Ringdal R, Espnes GA, Moksnes UK. Positive mental health literacy: development and validation of a measure among Norwegian adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):717. [CrossRef] 9. Jung H, Von Sternberg K, Davis K. Expanding a measure of mental health literacy: development and validation of a multicomponent mental health literacy measure. Psychiatry Res. 2016;243:278-286. [CrossRef] 10. Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi J. Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Aust e-J Adv Ment Health. 2005;4(3):218- 251. [CrossRef] 11. Rafal G, Gatto A, DeBate R. Mental health literacy, stigma, and helpseeking behaviors among male college students. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(4):284-291. [CrossRef] 12. O’Connor M, Casey L. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS): a new scale-based measure of mental health literacy. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229(1- 2):511-516. [CrossRef] 13. World Health Organization. Adolescent mental health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-hea lth. Accessed June 5, 2021
  3. Goktas S, Isıklı B, Onsuz MF, Yenilmez C, Metintas S. Evaluation of the Turkish validity and reliability of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (RSOY Scale). Konuralp Med J. 2019;11(3):424-431. [CrossRef] 15. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009, pp. 89
  4. Eryılmaz A. Development of