Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The Study Aimed for the Mediation Role of Occupational Motivation on The Effect of Leader Member Exchange on The Organizatıonal Identification

Lider Üye Etkileşiminin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Mesleki Motivasyonun Aracı Değişken Rolüne Yönelik Araştırma

Pages
1533–1552
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Examination of leader member exchange and organizational identification and revealing the findings related to this provide important administrative implications for universities in terms of academicians who exhibit unique qualities due to the nature of their profession.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the exchange between leaders and members of the organization on the level of organizational identification of academicians and the mediating role of the professional motivation level of the employees in this effect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of the study show that leader member interaction affects organizational identification in a significant and positive way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Examination of leader member exchange and organizational identification and revealing the findings related to this provide important administrative implications for universities in terms of academicians who exhibit unique qualities due to the nature of their profession.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the exchange between leaders and members of the organization on the level of organizational identification of academicians and the mediating role of the professional motivation level of the employees in this effect. The relational method from the quantitative method was used in the research. The sample of the study consists of faculty members working in Turkish public universities. A questionnaire consisting of scales of variables and demographic parts was used as data collection method. Simple linear regression was used to examine the relationships between variables and multiple regression analysis was used to test the mediation effect. The findings of the study show that leader member interaction affects organizational identification in a significant and positive way. In addition, academicians' occupational motivation has a full mediating effect in this effect. Examination of leader member exchange and organizational identification and revealing the findings related to this provide important administrative implications for universities in terms of academicians who exhibit unique qualities due to the nature of their profession.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversitelerde, lider ve örgüt üyeleri arasındaki etkileşimin, akademisyenlerin örgütsel özdeşleme düzeyi üzerindeki etkisini ve bu etkide çalışanların mesleki motivasyon düzeyinin aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veri toplama yöntemi olarak değişkenlerin ölçeklerinden ve demografik bölümden oluşan anket kullanılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek amacıyla korelasyon, basit doğrusal regresyon ve aracılık etkisini test etmek amacıyla çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma, lider üye etkileşiminin örgütsel özdeşleşmeyi anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediğini ve bu etkide mesleki motivasyonun tam aracılık rolüne sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Mesleğinin doğası gereği özgün nitelikler sergileyen akademisyenler açısından lider üye etkileşiminin ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin incelenmesine ilişkin bulguların ortaya konulması üniversiteler için önemli yönetimsel çıkarımlar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIREL, A. Ç., ZEYNEL, E. (2022). The Study Aimed for the Mediation Role of Occupational Motivation on The Effect of Leader Member Exchange on The Organizatıonal Identification. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 1533–1552. https://ajindex.com/articles/434736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AMBROSE, M. L. & KULIK, C. T. (1999). “Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s”, Journal of Management, 25: 231-292.
  2. ASHFORTH, B. E. & MAEL, F. (1989). “Social identity theory and the organization”, The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1): 20-39.
  3. ASHFORTH, B. E., HARRISON, S. H. & CORLEY, K. G. (2008). “Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions”, Journal of Management, 34: 325–374.
  4. BARON, M. & KENNY, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator –mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
  5. BENKHOFF, B. (1997). Better performance through organizational ıdentication: a test of outcomes and antecedents based on social identity theory, J. Wickham (Ed.), The Search for Competitiveness and Its Implications for Employment. Oak Tree Press,
  6. Dublin. CAMPBELL, D. J. & PRITCHARD, R. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology, Dunnette, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (63-130).
  7. Rand McNally, Chicago. CARMELI, A., SCHAUBROECK, J. & TISHLER, A. (2011). “How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance”, The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (2): 399-411.
  8. CHEN, G. & BLIESE, P. D. (2002). “The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity”, Manuscript submitted for publication, 87: 549-556.
  9. CHEN, G. & KANFER, R. (2006). “Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams”, Research in organizational behavior, 27: 223-267.
  10. COLLINSON, V. & COOK, T. F. (2003). “Learning to share, sharing to learn”, Journal of Educational Administration, 42 (3): 312-331.
  11. CRONIN, B. (2001). “Knowledge management, organizational culture and Anglo-American higher education”, Journal of Information Science, 27 (3): 129-137.
  12. ÇANKIR, B. & PALALAR ALKAN, D. (2018). “Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Dağıtım Adaletinin Aracılık Rolü”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi Journal of Business Research-Turk, 10 (3): 929-949.
  13. ÇOKLUK, Ö., ŞEKERCİOĞLU G. & BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, 3. Baskı,
  14. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  15. DANSEREAU, F., GRAEN, G. & HAGA, W. J. (1975). “A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation