Journals / Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

What is the Most Important Problem in Smoking Cessation?

Sigara Bırakma/Bıraktırmada En Önemli Sorun Ne?

Pages
430–438
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increased follow-up may decrease restarting and may increase the success of smoking cessation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: A significant portion 29.2% of the adult population is addicted to smoking in our country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the influencing factors and the long-term 24 months success of quitting at a smoking cessation centre SCC was evaluated.Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increased follow-up may decrease restarting and may increase the success of smoking cessation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sigara · Sigara bırakma · Başarı

Abstract

Objective: A significant portion 29.2% of the adult population is addicted to smoking in our country. Smoking cessation programmes are important in the fight against smoking. Although the majority of smokers would like to quit smoking, only a small part of them are able to achieve this. In this study, the influencing factors and the long-term 24 months success of quitting at a smoking cessation centre SCC was evaluated.Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study population consisted of applicants to this center within one year 980 persons . The long-term 24 months after the application success in quitting was determined. The influencing factors were investigated. Results: The mean age of the applicants was 41.3 years and the age of starting smoking was 16.4 years. The average cigarette consumption was 26.6 packs/year. 3.6% of the applicants had applied to the SCC at a doctor's recommendation. The rate of coming for follow-up was very low 18.5% .Smoking cessation success was determined as 21.5%. Also, 25.5% of the applicants declared that they quit smoking and then restarted. Analyses demonstrated that two main factors were influential on the success. The success rate was higher in smokers aged 50+ 1.6 times and those with low nicotine dependence 2.2 times . The therapeutics used for treatment, the treatment cost and the specialization of the doctor had no significant effect on the success. Conclusion: The long-term smoking cessation success rate was found to be 21.5%. The success rate was higher in smokers aged 50+ and those with low nicotine dependence. These target groups may be the priority. In our country, where nine physician visits are performed per person per year, the rate of referring smokers to SCCs by physicians is quite low 3.6% . It was also important that the follow-up rate of the patients was rather low. The rate of restarting after quitting was high. Increased follow-up may decrease restarting and may increase the success of smoking cessation.

Özet

Amaç: Ülkemizde yetişkin nüfusunun önemli bir kısmı %29,2 sigara içmekte ve tütünle mücadelede “sigara bıraktırma çalışmaları” önemli yer tutmaktadır. Bağımlıların çoğunluğu bırakmak istemesine rağmen sadece çok küçük bir kısmı başarılı olabilmektedir. Çalışmamızda sigara bırakma merkezinin SBM başvuru sonrası uzun dönemdeki 24 ay bırakma başarısı ve etkili faktörler belirlenmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif kohort çalışmadır. Devlet hastanesine bağlı SBM’ne bir yıl içinde başvuran 980 kişi çalışmaya alınmıştır. Başvurudan 24 ay sonra kişilere ulaşılarak uzun dönemli bırakma durumu araştırılmıştır. Bırakma üzerine etkili faktörler incelenmiştir.Bulgular: Başvuranların yaş ortalaması 41,3, sigaraya başlama yaşı 16,4’dür. Ortalama sigara tüketimi 26,6 paket/yıldır. Başvuranların %3,6’sı doktor önerisiyle kliniğe başvurmuştur. Başvuru sonrası kontrole gelme oranı oldukça düşüktür %18,5 . Uzun dönemli >24 ay sigarayı bırakma oranı %21,5’dir. Başvuranların %25,5’i bırakmış ancak sonradan tekrar başlamıştır. Sigarayı bırakma iki grupta anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulunmuştur. Nikotin bağımlığı düşük olanlarda 2,2 kat ve 50 yaş üzeri kişilerde 1,6 kat bırakma daha fazladır p

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, N., BOZKURT, A. İ., ERDOĞAN, A. (2022). What is the Most Important Problem in Smoking Cessation?. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 430–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/434345

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2017: Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. (https://www.who.int/tobacco/ global_report/2017/en/). T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2017. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No 1106; 2017:58. Küresel Yetişkin Tütün Araştırması Türkiye 2012. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 948, 2014. WHO. Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011M-POWER. Warning about the dangers of tobacco. (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/ 9789240687813_eng.pdf). Erişim tarihi: 05.01.2018.
  2. Aveyard P, West R. Managing smoking cessation. BMJ 2007; 335:37-41.
  3. Zhu S, Melcer T, Sun J, Rosbrok B. Pierce JP. Smoking cessation with and without assistance: A population- based analysis. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18:305-11.
  4. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The fagerström test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the fagerstrom olerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991; 86(9):1119-27. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2017. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No 1106; 2017: 160. Slama K, Redman S, Perkins J, Reid AL, Sanson-Fisher RW. The effectiveness of two smoking cessation programs for use in general practice. A randomized clinical trial. BMJ 1990; 300:1707-9.
  5. Simon AJ, Carmody TP, Hudes HS, Snyder E, Murray J. Intensive smoking cessation counseling versus minimal counseling among hospitalized smokers treated with transdermal nicotine replacement: A randomized trial. Am J Med 2003;114: 555-62.
  6. Gücük S, Kayhan M. 2019. Hastalarımızın kontrole gelme sıklıkları ile sigara bırakma davranışları ilişkisi: Polikliniğimizin ilk bir yıllık sonuçları. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi 2019; 41(4):371-9.
  7. Prado GF, Siqueira Lombardi EM, Bussacos MA, Arrabal-Fernandes FL, Terra-Filho M, Santos UB. A real- life study of the effectiveness of different pharmacological approaches to the treatment of smoking cessation: Re- discussing the predictors of success. Clinics 2011; 66(1): 65-71.
  8. Bhang, SY, Choi, SW, Ahn, JH, Kim K, Kim H, Park HK. Predictors of success at six-month follow-up at a public smoking cessation clinic in South Korea. Asia- Pacific Psychiatry 2013; 5(3):197-204.
  9. Raherison C, Marjary A, Valpromy B, Prevot S, Fossoux H, Taytard A. Evaluation of smoking cessation success in adults. Respir Med 2005; 99:1303-10.
  10. Tillgren P, Haglund BJ, Lundberg M, Romelsjo A. The sociodemographic patern of tobacco cessation in the 980s: results from a panel study of living condition surveys i