Journals / Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Current Retention Applications in Orthodontics: Literature Review

Ortodontide Güncel Pekiştirme Uygulamaları: Literatür Derlemesi

Pages
27–35
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, an overview of the retention period, and the features, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of the current retention types will be discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The retention period is the last and important stage of long-term orthodontic treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The retention period has given increased attention recently with the increased follow-up period after orthodontic treatments and esthetic awareness and expectations of the patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, an overview of the retention period, and the features, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of the current retention types will be discussed
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ortodontik pekiştirme apareyleri · Nüks · Pekiştirme programı

Abstract

The retention period is the last and important stage of long-term orthodontic treatment. Although the ideal retention appliance decision for the patient differs according to the initial malocclusion, the patient’s age, treatment planning, and other factors, the retention appliances can generally be classified as removable and fixed appliances. The retention period has given increased attention recently with the increased follow-up period after orthodontic treatments and esthetic awareness and expectations of the patients. There are recent studies on new methods or new materials for the most reliable and efficient retention type for orthodontic patients in the literature. In this review, an overview of the retention period, and the features, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of the current retention types will be discussed

Özet

Pekiştirme dönemi uzun zaman alan ortodontik tedavinin son ve önemli bir aşamasıdır. Pekiştirme dönemi malokluzyonun tipine, hastanın yaşına, uygulanan tedavi planına ve diğer faktölere göre farklılıklar göstermekle birlikte genel olarak sabit ve hareketli olarak sınıflandırılabilir. Pekiştirme dönemi, son yıllarda tedavi sonrası hasta takip sürelerinin uzaması ve hastaların sosyokültürel seviyelerinin artmasıyla birlikte ortodontik tedavinin daha fazla önem verilen bir aşaması olmuştur. Günümüzde kullanıma yeni sunulan ürünlerle hem hasta uyumu artırılmaya hem de daha etkin pekiştirme sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmamızda pekiştirme aşamasına genel bir bakış ve güncel birkaç pekiştirme tipinin özelliklerine değinilecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAT, E., BAYIR, F. (2022). Current Retention Applications in Orthodontics: Literature Review. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 27–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/434228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ülgen M. Ortodontik tedavi prensipleri. 1993.
  2. Melrose C, Millett DT. Toward a perspective on ortho- dontic retention? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113(5):507-14.
  3. Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of chan- ges in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93(5):423-8.
  4. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics, 4th ed. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006. Angle E. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 3th ed. Philadelphia: 1899. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62(3):296-309. Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dyna- mics. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20(4):761-88. Lundstrom AF. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base. Int J Orthod and Oral Surg 1925; 11:1109-33. Rogers AP. Making facial muscles our allies in treatment and retention. Dental Cosmos 1922; 64:711-30. Proffıt WR. Equilibrium theory revisited: Factors influen- cing position of the teeth. The Angle Orthodontist 1978; 48(3):175-86.
  5. Littlewood SJ, Russell JS, Spencer RJ. Why do orthodon- tic cases relapse? Orthodontic Update 2009; 2(2):38-44. Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C. Removable ther- moplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers-a prospec- tive study of different wear regimens. The European Jour- nal of Orthodontics 2011; 34(4):475-9.
  6. Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini Z-S. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(3):224-31.
  7. Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG, Sheridan J. Orthodontic reten- tion and stability: A clinical perspective. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41(3):125-32.
  8. Sahoo KC, Pattanaik S. Modified wrap-around retainer: A quick tip to enhance the retention of the appliance. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(7):ZH01. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: A randomi- zed controlled trial. Part 1: Stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40(4):387-98.
  9. Mollov ND, Lindauer SJ, Best AM, Shroff B, Tufekci E. Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(4):468-73.
  10. Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013; 8