Journals / Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Whitening Systems

Farklı Beyazlatma Sistemlerinin Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
119–124
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically significant difference was observed between the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching product p>0.05 .Conclusion: It was concluded that the home bleaching system has superior bleaching efficiency compared to the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching products

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the bleaching efficiency of three different bleaching systems on extracted teeth.Material and Methods: In this study, 21 extracted human upper incisors were used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples were divided into three groups according to the bleaching method to be applied: Office Bleaching Office Philips Zoom White Speed, containing 25% hydrogen peroxide, Philips Oral Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, USA n=7 ; Home Bleaching Home Opalescence PF, Ultradent Products, Inc., containing 16% carbamide peroxide n=7 ; and Over The Counter OTC White beauty & health care GmbH, Germany n=7 .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically significant difference was observed between the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching product p>0.05 .Conclusion: It was concluded that the home bleaching system has superior bleaching efficiency compared to the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching products
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beyazlatma · Ev tipi beyazlatma · Ofis tipi beyazlatma

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the bleaching efficiency of three different bleaching systems on extracted teeth.Material and Methods: In this study, 21 extracted human upper incisors were used. Samples were divided into three groups according to the bleaching method to be applied: Office Bleaching Office Philips Zoom White Speed, containing 25% hydrogen peroxide, Philips Oral Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, USA n=7 ; Home Bleaching Home Opalescence PF, Ultradent Products, Inc., containing 16% carbamide peroxide n=7 ; and Over The Counter OTC White beauty & health care GmbH, Germany n=7 . Color measurements were performed before starting bleaching, by using the Vita Easy shade Spectrophotometer VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, BadSäckingen, Germany . Bleaching was performed with various protocols according to the manufacturerʼs instructions. Color measurements were repeated 24 hours after the end of all bleaching procedures, by using the spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically with the ANOVA test and Tukey HSD test p3.3 . No statistically significant difference was observed between the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching product p>0.05 .Conclusion: It was concluded that the home bleaching system has superior bleaching efficiency compared to the office bleaching system and the over the counter bleaching products

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı beyazlatma sisteminin çekilmiş dişler üzerinde beyazlatma etkinliğinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 21 adet çekilmiş insan üst keser dişi kullanılmıştır. Örnekler uygulanacak beyazlatma yöntemine göre üç gruba ayrıldı: Ofis Tipi Beyazlatma Ofis %25 hidrojen peroksit içeren Philips Zoom White Speed, Philips Oral Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, ABD n=7 ; Ev Tipi Beyazlatma Home %16 karbamid peroksit içeren Opalescence PF, UltradentProducts, Inc n=7 ; ve Tezgâh Üstü Ürün OTC White beauty & healthcare GmbH, Almanya n=7 . Beyazlatma işlemine başlamadan önce Vita Easy Shade Spektrofotometre VITA ZahnfabrikH. RauterGmbH& Co.KG, Bad Säckingen, Almanya kullanılarak dişlerin renk ölçümü yapıldı. Beyazlatma işlemleri üretici talimatlarına göre farklı protokollerle yapıldı. Tüm beyazlatma işlemleri bittikten 24 saat sonra renk ölçümleri spektrofotometre ile tekrar yapıldı. Elde edilen veriler ANOVA testi ve Tukey HSD testiyle istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi p3,3 . Ofis beyazlatma sistemi ve tezgâh üstü beyazlatma ürünü arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gözlenmedi p>0,05 .Sonuç: Evde beyazlatma sisteminin, ofis tipi beyazlatma sistemi ve tezgâh üstü beyazlatma ürünlere kıyasla daha üstün beyazlatma etkinliğine sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNDAR, A., BARUTÇUGİL, Ç., BATMAZ, S. G., YILDIZ, B. (2022). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Whitening Systems. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/434227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Koruk D, Kirzioğlu Z. Diş beyazlatma tedavisinin güveni- lirliği. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakül- tesi Dergisi 2010; 11(1):29-37.
  2. Chemin K, Rezende M, Loguercio A, Reis A, Kossatz S. Effectiveness of and dental sensitivity to at-home bleac- hing with 4% and 10% hydrogen peroxide: A randomi- zed, triple-blind clinical trial. Oper Dent 2018; 43(3):232- 40. AlSheikh R, El-Embaby A. Spectrophotometric compari- son of effectiveness of two in-office bleaching agents with/ without light activation: A clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19(6):637-41.
  3. Sari M, Koyutürk A, Çankaya S. Çocukların tükettiği yiyecek ve içeceklerin süt ve daimi diş rengine etkisi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2011; 14(1):18-23.
  4. Karadaş M, Seven N. Vital dişlerde beyazlatma. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 24(3):126-35.
  5. Yuzugullu B, Çelik C, Erkut S. Karbamid peroksit içeren beyazlatma ajanının kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüz- lülüğüne etkisi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008; 18(3):94-8.
  6. Yilmaz Z, Neşe A. Diş hekimi kontrolünde olmayan (OTC) beyazlatma ürünlerinin genç daimi diş minesinin renk, mikrosertlik, yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve morfolojisine etkileri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2019; 29(1):33- 43. ICoI C. Colorimetry: Official recommendations of the international commission on illumination. Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE. 1971.
  7. Şeker O, Hazal S. Colour and bleaching in aesthetic dentistry. Dent & Med J 2019; 1(1):1-20. de l’Eclairage CI. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. Paris: CIE. 1978.
  8. Kielbassa AM, Beheim-Schwarzbach NJ, Neumann K, Zantner C. In vitro comparison of visual and computer- aided pre-and post-tooth shade determination using vari- ous home bleaching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101(2):92-100.
  9. Tezel H, Ertaş ÖS, Özata F, Dalgar H, Korkut ZO. Effect of bleaching agents on calcium loss from the enamel surface. Quintessence Int 2007; 38(4):339-47. Associates CR. New generation in‐office vital tooth bleac- hing, part 2. CRA 2003; 27(3):1-3. Fasanaro TS. Bleaching teeth: history, chemicals, and methods used for common tooth discolorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 1992; 4(3):71-8.
  10. Goldstein RE, Garber DA. Complete dental bleaching. Quintessence Publishing (IL), 1995.
  11. Mushashe AM, Coelho BS, Garcia PP, Nascimento Rechia BC, Cunha LF, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC. Effect of different bleaching protocols on whitening efficiency and enamel superficial microhardness. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(8):772-5