Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Araştırma çıraklığı aracılığıyla öğrencilerin bireysel ve evrensel bilimin doğası anlayışları arasında bağlantılar oluşturma

Creating links between students’ personal and global understandings of nature of science through research apprenticeships

Pages
97–111
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications for the teaching, learning, and assessment of NOS in these contexts is discussed and a research agenda is proposed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The standard view of Nature of Science (NOS) is that the development of sophisticated understandings of professional science practice can and should be an explicit goal of science education in traditional school settings (Lederman, 1992; Lederman, 2007).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Others suggest that the culture of the science classroom is so different from the culture of a working science lab that students may hold two distinct views of NOS (Hogan, 2000; Sandoval, 2005).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications for the teaching, learning, and assessment of NOS in these contexts is discussed and a research agenda is proposed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The standard view of Nature of Science (NOS) is that the development of sophisticated understandings of professional science practice can and should be an explicit goal of science education in traditional school settings (Lederman, 1992; Lederman, 2007). This perspective implies that students have one working conception of NOS. Others suggest that the culture of the science classroom is so different from the culture of a working science lab that students may hold two distinct views of NOS (Hogan, 2000; Sandoval, 2005). We believe that secondary students experiences in scientific research apprenticeships have the potential to allow these learners to become members of a working science lab where they truly experience an authentic form of science. These experiences may bridge the gap between students’ personal and global understandings of NOS. Implications for the teaching, learning, and assessment of NOS in these contexts is discussed and a research agenda is proposed.

Özet

Bilimin doğası ile ilgili genel görüşe göre profesyonel bilim uygulamaları hakkında üst düzeyde anlayış geliştirme geleneksel okul düzeninde fen eğitiminin açık ve anlaşılır bir hedefi olmalıdır (Lederman, 1992; Lederman, 2007). Bu bakış açısı öğrencilerin tek bir bilimin doğası anlayışına sahip olmasını ifade etmektedir. Bazılarına göre ise okullardaki fen sınıflarının kültürü bir bilim laboratuvarından o kadar farklıdır ki öğrenciler apayrı iki farklı bilimin doğası görüşüne sahip olabilirler (Hogan, 2000; Sandoval, 2005). Biz ise lise düzeyinde bilimsel çalışmalara asistanlık yapma deneyiminin bu öğrencilere bilimin doğasını doğrudan öğrenebilecekleri bir bilim laboratuvarının parçası olma imkanı sağlayacağına inanıyoruz. Bu deneyim öğrencilerin kişisel bilimin doğası anlayışları ile evrensel bilimin doğası anlayışı arasındaki farklılığı giderebilir. Bu deneyimin öğrenme, öğretme ve bilimin doğasını değerlendirme açısından etkileri tartışıldı ve bir araştırma gündemi önerildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURGIN, S. R., SADLER, T. D. (2022). Araştırma çıraklığı aracılığıyla öğrencilerin bireysel ve evrensel bilimin doğası anlayışları arasında bağlantılar oluşturma. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 97–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/431102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alters, B.J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 39-55.
  3. Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
  4. Akerson, V.L., & Volrich, M.L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a firstgrade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377- 394. Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70-102.
  5. Bell, R.L., Blair, L.M., Crawford, B.A., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487-509.
  6. Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521-539.
  7. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  8. Burgin, S.R., Sadler, T.D., & Koroly, M.J. (in review). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: Variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education. Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195-213.
  9. Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175- 218. Cooley, W.W., & Klopfer, L.E. (1961). Test on understanding science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Helms, J.V. (1998). Science and/in the community: Context and goals in practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 643-653.
  10. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51-70.
  11. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002