SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Educational interface agents as social models in virtual learning environments

Sanal öğrenme ortamlarında sosyal model olarak eğitsel arayüz ajanları

Ebru ÇAKMAK KILIÇ
Ramazan YILMAZ
Pages
243–264
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Definition of educational interfaceagents, their characteristics, role and functions, and the use of educational interface agentsin virtual learning environments are mentioned in the article.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increase in the number of students and the amount of information, the complexity ofthe content, lifelong learning‟s and individual education‟s becoming more of an issue,learners‟ desire to receive education without limitation of time and place led virtuallearning environments to become widespread.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In spite of the fact that virtual learningenvironments hav e a lot of advantages, there are also some disadvantages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Definition of educational interfaceagents, their characteristics, role and functions, and the use of educational interface agentsin virtual learning environments are mentioned in the article.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The increase in the number of students and the amount of information, the complexity ofthe content, lifelong learning‟s and individual education‟s becoming more of an issue,learners‟ desire to receive education without limitation of time and place led virtuallearning environments to become widespread. In spite of the fact that virtual learningenvironments hav e a lot of advantages, there are also some disadvantages. One of them isthe limitations experienced in providing social interaction with the learners. The studiescarried out in recent years predict that some parts of problems the learners experienced invirtual learning environments about social interaction could be resolved by means of educational interface agents . In this article, educational interface agents and theimportance of them in terms of virtual learning environments are dealt. Informationp resented in the article was obtained via field survey. Definition of educational interfaceagents, their characteristics, role and functions, and the use of educational interface agentsin virtual learning environments are mentioned in the article.

Özet

Öğrenci sayısının artması ve bilgi miktarının çoğalması, içeriğin karmaşıklaşması, yaşamboyu öğrenmenin ve bireysel eğitimin önem kazanması, öğrenenlerin zaman ve mekânkısıtlaması olmadan eğitim almak istemeleri sanal öğrenme ortamlarının yaygınlaşmasınayol açmıştır. Sanal öğrenme ortamlarının birçok avantajı olmasına karşın birtakımdezavantajları da bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan biri de öğrenenlerle sosyal etkileşimi sağlamakonusunda yaşanan sınırlılıklardır. Son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen araştırmalar sanalöğrenme ortamlarında öğrenenlerin sosyal etkileşim sağlama konus unda yaşadığısorunların bir kısmını eğitsel a rayüz a janlarıyla giderilebileceğini öngörmektedir. Bumakalede eğitsel arayüz ajanları ve bunların sanal öğrenme ortamları açısından önemi elealınmaktadır. Makalede sunulan bilgiler alan taraması ile elde e dilmiştir. Makalede eğitselarayüz ajanlarının tanımı, karakteristikleri, rol ve işlevleri ile sanal öğrenme ortamlarındaeğitsel arayüz ajanı kullanımından bahsedilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, E. Ç., YILMAZ, R. (2022). Educational interface agents as social models in virtual learning environments. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 243–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/431072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akpınar, R. (2004). Duygusal yüz ifadelerini anlama becerisini geliştirmeye yönelik örnek bir öğretim programı. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1). Andre´, E., Rist, T., Van Mulken, S., Klesen, M. and Baldes, S. (2000). The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 220 -255. Badler, N., Bindiganavale, R., Allbeck, J., Schuler, W., Zhao, L. and Palmer, M. (2000). Parameterized action representation for virtual human agents. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Embodied Conversatio nal Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 256 -284. Bacaksız, G. (1986). İki boyutludan üç boyutlu görüntüye. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  2. Eskişehir. Ball, G. and Breese, J. (2000). Emotion and personality in a conver sational agent. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 189 -219. Baylor, A. L. and Kim, Y. (2003). The role of gender and ethnicity in pedagogical agent perception. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3220(2004), p.268 -270. Be´cheiraz, P. and Thalmann, D. (1998). A behavioural animation system for autonomous actors personified by emotions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Embodied Conversational Characters (WECC‟98). AAAI and ACM, Tahoe City, CA, p. 57 - 65. Brenner, W., Zarnekow, R. and Wittig, H. (1998). Intelligent software agents. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Byl, P. and Taylor, J. (2007). A web 2.0/web3d hybrid platform for engaging students in elearning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education -TOJDE, 8(3), Article:7. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., and Churchill, E. (2000). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Chan, T.W. (1995). Artificial agents in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), p. 263 -282. Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W. and Lin, C. J. (2002). Redefining the learning companion: The past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, p. 255 -269. Ch urchill, E., Cook, L., Hodgson, P., Prevost, S. and Sullivan, J. (2000). „„May I help you?‟‟: Designing embodied conversational agent allies. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 64 -94. Cl