Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

School Principals’ Metaphoric Perceptions of Creative Teacher and Creative School Concepts

Yaratıcı Öğretmen ve Yaratıcı Okul Kavramlarına İlişkin Okul Müdürlerinin Metaforik Algıları

Pages
1203–1238
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it was seen that “architect” was the most common metaphor for creative teachers and “cloth shop” was the most common metaphor for the creative school concept.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine school principals’ metaphoric perceptions of the concepts of creative teachers and creative schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the study’s results, a total of 33 metaphors within 5 categories were obtained for school principals’ creative teacher concepts, including the categories of “shaping by processing”, “wise”, “innovative”, “guide”, and “researcher”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it was seen that “architect” was the most common metaphor for creative teachers and “cloth shop” was the most common metaphor for the creative school concept.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine school principals’ metaphoric perceptions of the concepts of creative teachers and creative schools. This study applied a qualitative research pattern and a phenomenological pattern. The researchers selected a content analysis technique for their data analysis. According to the study’s results, a total of 33 metaphors within 5 categories were obtained for school principals’ creative teacher concepts, including the categories of “shaping by processing”, “wise”, “innovative”, “guide”, and “researcher”. When these categories were considered, it was seen that school principals’ perceived properties of a creative teacher mainly entail revealing and shaping their students’ potential. It was stated that creative teachers had wisdom, which was open to change, and apply innovative education models and guide students to shape their future and be researchers. A total of 33 metaphors within 5 categories were also obtained for creative school concepts; these categories were “individual differences”, “holistic development”, “scientific”, “life knowledge”, and “entertaining”. School principals stated that creative schools enable holistic mental, physical, and spiritual development by considering students’ individual differences and transferring knowledge to students in an entertaining way. Additionally, it was seen that “architect” was the most common metaphor for creative teachers and “cloth shop” was the most common metaphor for the creative school concept.

Özet

Bu araştırma okul müdürlerinin yaratıcı öğretmen ve yaratıcı okul kavramlarına ilişkin metaforikalgılarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmaya Van ilinde, kolay ulaşılabilir durum örneklemesi yoluylabelirlenmiş 33 okul müdürü katılmıştır. Nitel araştırma ile desenlenen bu araştırmada olgu bilim deseniuygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ise içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre okulmüdürlerinin yaratıcı öğretmen kavramına ilişkin “İşleyerek şekillendiren, bilge, yenilikçi, rehber, araştırmacı”olmak üzere 5 kategoride toplam 33 metafor oluşturdukları belirlenmiştir. Bu kategorilere bakıldığında okulmüdürlerinin yaratıcı öğretmenlerin özelliklerinin öncelikli olarak öğrencilerin potansiyellerini ortayaçıkarma ve şekillendirme olduğunu düşündükleri görülmektedir. Yaratıcı okul kavramına ilişkin ise“Bireysel farklılıklar, bütüncül gelişim, bilimsel, hayatın bilgisi, eğlendirici” olmak üzere 5 kategoride toplam 33metafor oluşturulmuştur. Okul müdürleri öğrencilerin bireysel farklılıklarının göz önündebulundurularak zihinsel, bedensel ve ruhsal olarak bütüncül gelişimlerine olanağın sunulduğu;bilimin ve hayatın bilgisinin eğlenceli hale getirerek öğrencilere aktarıldığı okulların yaratıcı okullarınözellikleri olduklarını belirtmişlerdir. Araştırmada ayrıca yaratıcı öğretmen kavramında “mimar”, yaratıcıokul kavramında ise “elbise dükkânı” metaforlarının çok kullanılan metaforlar olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZENGİN, M. (2022). School Principals’ Metaphoric Perceptions of Creative Teacher and Creative School Concepts. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 1203–1238. https://ajindex.com/articles/430806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akan, D., Yalçın, S. ve Yıldırım, İ. (2014). Okul müdürü kavramına ilişkin öğretmenlerin metaforik algıları. İlköğretim Online, 13(1), 169‐179 Amabile, T. M., Conti, R. Coon, H. Lazenby, J. ve Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi. org/10.5465/256995 Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41165921 Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 5(3), 77-87.
  2. Azevedo, I. (2007). Creativity and school career: a study with young people from elementary school (PhD thesis). Minho's university. Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? A conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Educational Leadership. 67 (1), 22-26.
  3. Balay, R. (2010). Yönetimde yaratıcılık. Yönetimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar (Edt.Memduhoğlu, H.B. ve Yılmaz, K.). Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Balcı, A. (1999). Metaphorical images of school: school perceptions of students, teachers and parents from four selected schools. Doktora tezi, ODTÜ, Ankara.
  5. Cardoso, A.P., Malheiro, R., Rodrigues, P., Felizardo, S. ve Lopes, A.(2014). Assessment and creativity stimulus in school context. Social and Behavioral Sciences 171, 864–873. doi:10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.01.202 Cinque M. (2010). Creative action: theory, training and practice of personal innovation. Milan: Franco Angeli. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cropley, A. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook 1, 83-114.
  6. Cropley. A. (2009). Creativity in education and learning – a guide for teachers and educators. New York: Routledge Falmer. Cremin, T. (2009). Creative teachers and creative teaching. In Anthony Wilson (ed), Creativity in Primary Education, 2nd ed. (pp. 36-46), Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd. Çapan, B. E. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli öğrencilere yönelik metaforik algıları. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (12), 140-154.
  7. Dikici, A., ve Soh, K. (2015). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behaviour: replication and modification. Higher Education of Social Science, 9 (3), 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3968/7486 Fasko, D. (2001) Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 317-327. https://doi. org/10.1