Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Suitable Plasticizer / Setting Accelerator Additive Type in Foam Concrete Production

Köpük Beton Üretiminde Uygun Akışkanlaştırıcı/Priz Hızlandırıcı Katkı Türünün Araştırılması

Pages
390–400
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rheological properties of the foam concrete can be determined in practice by Marsh cone method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Foam concrete has an increasing use today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a preferred type of lightweight concrete due to its ease of application and low unit weight.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rheological properties of the foam concrete can be determined in practice by Marsh cone method.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Foam concrete has an increasing use today. It is a preferred type of lightweight concrete due to its ease of application and low unit weight. In this study, the effects of plasticizer and setting accelerator additives added to foam concrete mixtures were investigated and optimization studies were carried out. According to this, the effect of fluidity, water / binder, water / solid ratios on fresh and hardened concrete properties were investigated. In this study, two different plasticizer additives and one setting accelerator chemical additive were used. The effects of chemical additives on mixtures were investigated. Use of the same proportions of polycarboxylic ether-based superplasticizer (SAp) additive compared to the addition of melamine sulfonate polymer based superplasticizer (SAm) were reduce fluidity times (more fluidty) and accordingly, higher strength values were obtained. Rheological properties of the foam concrete can be determined in practice by Marsh cone method.

Özet

Köpük betonlar günümüzde giderek artan bir kullanıma sahiptir. Uygulanmasının kolaylığı ve birimağırlığının düşük oluşu sebebiyle tercih edilen bir hafif beton türüdür. Bu çalışmada köpük betonkarışımlara ilave edilen akışkanlaştırıcı ve priz hızlandırıcı katkıların etkileri incelenerek optimizasyonçalışmaları yürütülmüştür. Buna göre akışkanlık, su/bağlayıcı, su/katı oranlarının taze ve sertleşmişbeton özelliklerine etkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışmada iki farklı süper akışkanlaştırıcı (SA) katkı ve bir prizhızlandırıcı kimyasal katkı kullanılmıştır. Polikarboksilik eter esaslı süper akışkanlaştırıcı (SAp) katkının,aynı oranlarda Melamin sülfonat polimeri esaslı süper akışkanlaştırıcı (SAm) katkıya göre akışkanlıksürelerinde azalma (daha akışkan) ve buna bağlı olarak daha yüksek dayanım değerleri sağlamıştır.Köpük betonun akışkanlık özelliklerinin Marsh konisi ile ölçülmesinin özellikle şantiye ortamında kolayve pratik bir yöntem olacağı değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, E., DEMİR, İ., BAŞPINAR, M. S. (2022). Investigation of Suitable Plasticizer / Setting Accelerator Additive Type in Foam Concrete Production. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 390–400. https://ajindex.com/articles/430126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Agarwal, S.K, Masood, I. and Malhotra, S.K., 2000. Compatibility of superplasticizers with different cements. Construction and Building Materials, 14 (5), 253–259.
  2. Aldridge, D., 2005.
  3. Introduction to foamed concrete What, Why and How? In: Dhir, R.K., Newlands, M.D. and McCarthy, A. (Eds). Use of foamed concrete in construction. London: Thomas Telford. 1-14.
  4. Amran, Y.H.M, Farzadnia, A.A. and Abang A., 2015. Properties and applications of foamed concrete; a review. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 990–1005. Anonim, 1997.
  5. ASTM, Standard test method for foaming agents for use in producing cellular concrete using preformed foam, in: ASTM C796-97; Standard Test Method for Unit Weight. Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of concrete, ASTM C138, Q. C138, Philadelphia. Anonim, 2017. ASTM C 494, Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, ACI. Anonim, 1991.
  6. ASTM, Standard Specification for Foaming Agents Used in Making Preformed Foam for Cellular Concrete, ASTM C869-91, Q. C138, Philadelphia. Anonim, 1997.
  7. ASTM, Standard test method for foaming agents for use in producing cellular concrete using preformed foam, in: ASTM C796-97; Standard Test Method for Unit Weight. Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of concrete, ASTM C138, Q. C138, Philadelphia. Anonim, 2009. BS EN 12350-6, Testing Fresh Concrete: Density, British Standards Institution, London, UK. Anonim, 1994. British Cement Association (BCA), Foamed Concrete; Composition and Properties, Report Ref. 46.042, Slough. Anonim, 2010. TS EN 934-2 Kimyasal katkılar- Beton, harç ve şerbet için- Bölüm 2: Beton katkıları- Tarifler ve özellikler, uygunluk, işaretleme ve etiketleme, Ankara. Anonim, 2016. TS 13655 Kâgir Birimler - Özellikler - Köpükbeton Kâgir Birimler, Ankara.
  8. Bennett, D., 2002.
  9. Innovations in Concrete, Thomas Telford, London, 62. Dhir, R.K., Jones, M.R. and Nicol, L.A. (1999). Development of structural grade foamed concrete. Final Report, DETR Research Contract 39/3/385, pp.84. Dijik, V.W. and Jong, P., 1991. Determining the Rn exhalation rate of building material using liquidscintillation counting. Health Physics. 64 (4), 501-509.
  10. Du, L. and Folliard, K. J., 2005. Mechanisms of air entrainment in concret, Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (8), 1463-1471.
  11. Ergene, M. T., 1975.
  12. Foamed Concrete Structures, Hamburg, NY (US), Patent AU 115 FX Ergene, Stanley Works, New Britain, Patent no. US3867159A Jezequel, P.H. and Mathonier B., 2011.
  13. Foamed Concrete, Lafarge, Washington, DC (US),