SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

An Analytical Study on Tsunami Run-up due to Submarine Landslidesfrom Different Bottom Profiles

Farklı Taban Profiline Sahip Denizaltı Heyelanları Sonucu Meydana Gelen Tsunami Tırmanması için Analitik Bir Çalışma

Baran AYDIN
Pages
426–433
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that the Gaussian cross section produces slightly larger maximum run-up than the solitary wave cross section, even if the two profiles had the same maximum vertical thickness initially and the area occupied by the former was less than the latter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tsunamis generated by submarine landslides were analyzed through a linear analytical model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analytical solution existing in the literature was generalized to include different bottom profiles andmaximum run-ups originating from two different bottom forcing functions, namely Gaussian wave and solitary wave cross sections were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that the Gaussian cross section produces slightly larger maximum run-up than the solitary wave cross section, even if the two profiles had the same maximum vertical thickness initially and the area occupied by the former was less than the latter.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tsunamis generated by submarine landslides were analyzed through a linear analytical model. Analytical solution existing in the literature was generalized to include different bottom profiles andmaximum run-ups originating from two different bottom forcing functions, namely Gaussian wave and solitary wave cross sections were compared. Results indicated that the Gaussian cross section produces slightly larger maximum run-up than the solitary wave cross section, even if the two profiles had the same maximum vertical thickness initially and the area occupied by the former was less than the latter.

Özet

Denizaltı heyelanlarının meydana getirdiği tsunamiler doğrusal bir analitik model aracılığıylaincelenmiştir. Literatürdeki çözüm farklı taban profillerini içerecek şekilde genelleştirilmiş ve kesitiGauss ve soliter dalga olan taban profilleri sonucu oluşan maksimum tırmanmalar karşılaştırılmıştır.Sonuçlar, başlangıçta aynı kalınlığa sahip olmalarına ve Gauss profilinin kapladığı alanın daha azolmasına rağmen bu profilin oluşturduğu maksimum tırmanmanın daha fazla olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, B. (2022). An Analytical Study on Tsunami Run-up due to Submarine Landslidesfrom Different Bottom Profiles. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 426–433. https://ajindex.com/articles/429636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cecioni, C. and Bellotti, G., 2010. Inclusion of landslide tsunamis generation into a depth integrated wave model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 2259–2268.
  2. Di Risio, M., Bellotti, G., Panizzo, A. and Girolamo, P. D., 2009. Three-dimensional experiments on landslide generated waves at a sloping coast. Coastal Engineering, 56(5), 659–671.
  3. Di Risio, M. and Sammarco, P., 2008. Analytical modeling of landslide-generated waves. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 134, 53–60.
  4. Dutykh, D., Mitsotakis, D., Beysel, S. and Shokina, N., 2011. Dispersive waves generated by an underwater landslide. In: Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Equations Theory and Applications, University of Santiago de Compostela, 245-250.
  5. Fritz, H. M., Hager, W. H. and Minor, H.-E., 2004. Near field characteristics of landslide generated impulse waves. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 130(6), 287–302.
  6. Fuchs, H., Winz, E. and Hager, W. H., 2013. Underwater landslide characteristics from 2D laboratory modeling. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 139(6), 480–488.
  7. Grilli, S. T. and Watts, P., 2005. Tsunami generation by submarine mass failure I: Modeling, experimental validation, and sensitivity analyses. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 131(6), 283–297.
  8. Gusiakov, V. K., 2009. Tsunami History: Recorded. In: The Sea, Volume 15: Tsunamis, Harvard University Press, 23-53.
  9. Liu, P. L.-F., Lynett, P. and Synolakis, C. E., 2013. Analytical solutions for forced long waves on a sloping beach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 478, 101–109.
  10. Liu, P. L.-F., Wu, T.-R., Raichlen, F., Synolakis, C. E. and Borrero, J. C., 2005. Runup and rundown generated by three-dimensional sliding masses. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 536, 107–144.
  11. Lo, H.-Y. and Liu, P. L.-F., 2017. On the analytical solutions for water waves generated by a prescribed landslide. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 821, 85–116.
  12. Lynett, P. and Liu, P. L.-F., 2005. A numerical study of the run-up generated by three-dimensional landslides. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 110, C03006. Montagna, F., Bellotti, G. and Di Risio, M., 2011. 3D numerical modeling of landslide-generated tsunamis around a conical island. Natural Hazards, 58, 591– 608. Özeren, S. and Postacıoğlu, N., 2011. Nonlinear landslide tsunami run-up. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 691, 440– 460. Pelinovsky, E. N., 2003. Analytical models of tsunami generation by submarine landslid