AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightAs result of the study, specific energy value of reduced tillage flat planting wascalculated as 0.44 MJkg", ridge planting as 0.40 MJ kg", and direct drilling was calculated as 0.46 MJ kg".Comparing the energy output/ input rates, this rate was determined as 9.34 in reduced tillage flat planting, as10.36 in ridge planting, and as 9.06 in direct drilling. ln all methods, it was determined that fertilizer energy hadthe highest rate ofusage among the total input energies.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
ln this study, the energy balances of reduced tillage flat planting, ridge planting and direct planting methods usedin secondary crop silage corn production, planted after winter catch crop (wheat vetch mixture) in CukurovaRegion was determined. As result of the study, specific energy value of reduced tillage flat planting wascalculated as 0.44 MJkg", ridge planting as 0.40 MJ kg", and direct drilling was calculated as 0.46 MJ kg".Comparing the energy output/ input rates, this rate was determined as 9.34 in reduced tillage flat planting, as10.36 in ridge planting, and as 9.06 in direct drilling. ln all methods, it was determined that fertilizer energy hadthe highest rate ofusage among the total input energies.
Özet
Bu çalışmada, Çukurova Bölgesinde kışlık ara ürün (buğday fig karışımı) sonrası yetiştirilen ikinci ürün silajlık mısır üretiminde, azaltılmış toprak işlemeli düze ekim, sırta ekim ve doğrudan ekim yöntemlerinin enerji bilançoları belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonunda özgül enerji değeri azaltılmış toprak işlemeli düze ekimde 0.44 MJ kg", sırta ekimde 0.40 MJ kg", dogrudan ekimde 0.46 MJ kg'ı, olarak hesaplanmıştır. Enerji çıktı girdi oranları karşılaştırıldığında bu oran azaltılmış toprak işlemeli düze ekimde 9.34, sırta ekimde 10.36, doğrudan ekimde 9.06 olarak elde edilmiştir. Tüm yöntemlerde toplam girdi enerjileri içerisinde kullanım oranı en yüksek olanın gübre enerjisi olduğu bulunmuştur.